What I see here in sum is another high level tightly integrated Red Hat
employee saying the gist of "I'm really not saying it out of my
employer's interest and it has nothing to do with my personal
feelings".
Every single proponent of this argument that I have seen so far is
employed by one of
I think (if it matters to anyone what I think) that would be great to
see as long as there was some social/cultural incentive to not elect
"gatekeeper" types. I see alot of folks with very thin skin misusing
the authority they are trusted with in open source communities, it's
just never over any
beliefs into the GCC project roadmap beyond its
technical and licensing goals.
I would encourage anyone reading this to start treating this discussion
as off-topic disruption for the GCC SC.
-C
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:22 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 4/11/21 9:34 PM, Chris Punches via
Hello,
I've been reading quietly on how the GCC SC handles this and generally
only lurk here so that I can stay informed on GCC changes. I am nobody
you would probably care about, but, maybe I will be one day. No one
ever really knows.
I thought you'd like to know what "nobody" thinks,
