Hello everyone,
Is this Patch OK for trunk?
-Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 8:10 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PING][PATCH] for for c/PR57541
Hello Everyone,
Is this patch OK for trunk?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson [mailto:h...@bitrange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 7:24 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR 57692
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello Everyone,
This patch will fix
Hello Everyone,
This patch fixes the issue in PR 57490. The issue was that, the C and
C++ implementation was not handling array notations inside TRUTH_*_EXPR. I
added them and added the .i test case. Is this OK for trunk?
Here are ChangeLog entries:
gcc/c/ChangeLog
+2013-07-01
Hello Everyone,
This patch will fix a buffer overflow issue in a test case shown in PR
57766. I am committing this patch as obvious. I am willing to revert (or
modify) this patch if anyone has objections.
Here is the ChangeLog entry:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+2013-07-01 Balaji V. Iyer
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 12:24 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Rainer Orth
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:17:37PM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
gcc/c
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 1:09 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Rainer Orth
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:02:57PM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
OK
-Original Message-
From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:39 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V; Richard Henderson
Cc: Aldy Hernandez; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cilk Plus Array Notation for C++
On 06/24/2013 06:23 PM, Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone,
This patch will fix a FAIL in one of the test cases for array
notations. The reason for fail is that the array sizes were huge and thus it
was causing a stack overflow. This patch should fix the issue. I am committing
this patch as semi-obvious. I am willing to revert
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 12:11 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Aldy Hernandez; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jason Merrill
(ja...@redhat.com)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cilk Plus Array Notation for C++
On 06/20/2013 04:39 PM
Hello Everyone,
One of the struct field used by array notations (struct inv_list) was
accidentaly set to the type enum rid, but the correct value should be enum
tree_code. This was changed in the following patch. This was causing a warning.
The field is only used by C++ (which patch is
Hello Everyone,
This patch will replace the array sizes in array notation test suite
functions from a hard-coded value to a #defined one. The main reason for doing
this is that it will get easier in future if I want to experiment with
different array sizes. In some cases this change was
Hello Everyone,
Is this patch OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:22 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: anna.m.tikhon...@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] for for c/PR57541
Hello Everyone,
Attach
Hello Everyone,
This patch will make one of the array notation tests a runnable one
instead of a compile only. I have also changed the return values from just '1'
to distinct values so that it is easier to debug. This patch is committed as
obvious.
Here is the ChangeLog entry:
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Richard Henderson
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:19 PM
To: Aldy Hernandez
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com)
Subject: Re: [PATCH
Hello Everyone,
I am adding a new execution test to the array notation suite. In array
notation's __sec_reduce_max_ind and __sec_reduce_min_ind builtin functions, if
there is a tie for max/min value, then the higher index should be returned. In
this case, all the values are the same,
Hello Everyone,
I found a minor bug in one of the array notation test case. I
accidentally put the minus for length instead of stride. I have committed this
patch as obvious.
2013-06-16 Balaji V. Iyer balaji.v.i...@intel.com
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c (main2):
Hi Aldy,
Below are my responses to a couple of the things you pointed out.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:34 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jason Merrill (ja
Hello Everyone,
Attach, please find a patch that will fix the issues in C/PR57541. The
issue reported was that the parameters passed into the builtin array notation
reduction functions were not checked correctly. This patch should fix that
issue. It is tested on x86 and x86_64 and it
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:40 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com);
r...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cilk Plus Array Notation for C++
Overall, a lot
Hello Everyone,
I replaced abort and exit in one of the Cilk Plus Array Notation test
with return 1 and return 0, respectively. This patch (cut and pasted below) is
committed as obvious.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Hello Everyone,
This patch fixes an ICE when rank mismatch occurs in a modify
expression where the right-hand side is a function call. The crash is actually
occuring in a while loop whose result is not used, i.e. dead code. I removed
the dead code and things seem to work fine now.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 10:40 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jakub Jelinek; mpola...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57563
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Joseph S. Myers
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:16 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jakub Jelinek; mpola...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 5:18 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jakub Jelinek; mpola...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57563
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
I
Here is the ChangeLog entries. Sorry I forgot to include in my previous email.
gcc/c/ChangeLog
2013-06-10 Balaji V. Iyer balaji.v.i...@intel.com
* c-array-notation.c (fix_builtin_array_notation_fn): Fully folded
excessive precision expressions in function parameters. Also
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch that will fix the bug reported in PR
57563. There are a couple issues that went wrong. First, in the test case, we
have a double multiplied to a double. When -std=c99 flag is used, they get
converted to long double. The way to fix this is to
Hello Richard et al.,
I looked at my C++ implementation for Array Notations and a bunch of
helper functions (and one structure) can be shared between C and C++. Attached
is a patch that will move these functions from c/c-array-notation.c to
c-family/array-notation-common.c.
Is this OK
Hello Everyone,
This patch below should fix the bug reported in PR 57541. The following
statements were not caught by the array notation expander, and they should be
caught and replaced with zero nodes:
A[:];
A[x:y];
A[x:y:z];
Here are the Changelogs
gcc/c/ChangeLog
2013-06-07
Hello,
Is this OK for trunk? It involves very few changes (the patch is cut
and pasted below) and does not cause any bootstrap issues on my x86_64 running
SuSE.
Thanks,
-Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 8:44 PM
To: gcc
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 11:49 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Steve Ellcey
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pr57457
On 06/04/13 12:58, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Actually, you can eliminate the entire
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ellcey [mailto:sell...@mips.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 6:31 PM
To: Jeff Law
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite, cilk] Fix cilk tests for simulators
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 13:47 -0600, Jeff Law wrote
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:07 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Steve Ellcey
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pr57457
On 05/31/2013 12:01 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
-Original Message- From: gcc
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:07 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Steve Ellcey
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pr57457
On 06/04/2013 11:37 AM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Yes, that does simplify the whole thing
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 11:49 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Steve Ellcey
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pr57457
On 06/04/13 12:58, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Actually, you can eliminate the entire
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 2:27 PM
To: Steve Ellcey
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite, cilk] Fix cilk tests for simulators
On 06/03/2013 11:49 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:51 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; domi...@lps.ens.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for pr 57474
On 05/31/2013 06:28
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ellcey [mailto:sell...@mips.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 6:31 PM
To: Jeff Law
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite, cilk] Fix cilk tests for simulators
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 13:47 -0600, Jeff Law wrote
Hello Everyone,
Is it OK to move build_c_cast prototype into c-common.h? The reason for
this is that, I would like to share some of the code between array notation for
C and C++ and this function is sort of required for both places. Also, the
exact same call is available for both C and
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Dhumieres [mailto:domi...@lps.ens.fr]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2013 2:35 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: domi...@lps.ens.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for pr 57474
... This patch pasted below should fix that issue
Hello Everyone,
This patch will fix a bug reported in PR57457. One of the array
notation function was not checking for NULL_TREE before accessing its fields.
This patch should fix that issue. A test case is also added.
Is this OK for trunk?
Here are the ChangeLog Entries:
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 11:50 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Steve Ellcey
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pr57457
On 05/31/2013 07:54 AM, Iyer
HI Jeff et al.,
Forgot to ask in my previous email... Is this Ok for trunk?
-Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:02 PM
To: 'Jeff Law'
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Steve Ellcey
Subject: RE: [PATCH] pr57457
Hello Everyone,
PR reports that sec_implicit2 and sec_implicit regression tests were
failing in darwin. I looked into it and it is due to an uninitialized variable
(rhs_length). This patch pasted below should fix that issue. Is this OK for
trunk?
Here are the ChangeLog entries:
Hi David,
Please see my response below:
-Original Message-
From: David Edelsohn [mailto:dje@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:44 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Richard Henderson; Jakub Jelinek; Aldy Hernandez; Jeff Law; 'Joseph S.
Myers'; gcc-patches
Subject: RE
Hello Everyone,
One of the test in Cilk Plus array notation execution test for C was
wrong. Here is a fixed one:
Here is the Change log entry for it:
2013-05-30 Balaji V. Iyer balaji.v.i...@intel.com
PR c/57452
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c: Fixed out of
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:02 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: David Edelsohn; Richard Henderson; Jakub Jelinek; Aldy Hernandez; 'Joseph
S. Myers'; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C
Hello Everyone,
When I was looking at the erroneous test on PR 57452, I found out that
array notations in conditions were not expanded correctly. The rank for the
array notation condition must be same (or equal to zero) as the rank of the
array notations inside the else-block and
Hi Aldy
Please see my responses below.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:38 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Jeff Law; r
.
Is this patch OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:51 PM
To: Aldy Hernandez
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Jeff Law; r...@redhat.com; 'Joseph S
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Richard Henderson
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:52 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Aldy Hernandez; Jeff Law; 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE
Regarding the tests, I will merge trunk-cilk-in-gomp so we can reuse the
c-c++-
common infrastructure you wrote. There is no sense having multiple tests for
vectorlength, linear, etc.
Can you please add them under c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS directory?
AN = Array Notation
PS = Pragma SIMD
-Original Message-
From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:48 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Richard Henderson; Jakub Jelinek; Aldy Hernandez; Jeff Law; Joseph S.
Myers; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
/AN/cilkplus_AN_c.exp: New script.
Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:21 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Aldy Hernandez; Jakub Jelinek
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:03 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jeff Law; r...@redhat.com; Aldy Hernandez; 'Joseph S. Myers';
'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE
. I hope that's OK.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:34 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
On 2013-05-22
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:04 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Richard Henderson; 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
On Thu, May 23
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 4:52 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Richard Henderson; 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez';
'gcc-
patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
[I included Jeff Law also in this conversation]
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:23 PM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Richard Henderson; 'Joseph S. Myers
Hello Richard,
Thank you for reviewing my code. Please see my responses below.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:57 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc
Hi Jakub,
Please see my response below.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:15 AM
To: Richard Henderson
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 11:30 AM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
On 2013-05-21
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:20 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Richard Henderson; 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez';
'gcc-
patches'
Subject: Re
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:34 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
On 2013-05-22 08:18, Iyer
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Richard Henderson
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:18 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'Joseph S. Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:11 PM
To: Joseph S. Myers
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Jakub Jelinek; Richard Henderson; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-
patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
On 05
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:11 PM
To: Joseph S. Myers
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Jakub Jelinek; Richard Henderson; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-
patches'
Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
On 05
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:14 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek
Subject: Re: [gomp4/cilkplus] C parsing for Cilk Plus #pragma simd
On 05/20/13 14:34, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello Aldy, I
Hello Aldy et al.,
Attached, please find a patch on top of gomp4 branch that implements
Cilk's #pragma simd for C++. This is done in the same fashion as Aldy did in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00678.html (It creates OMP_SIMD
trees and let omp-low do the rest).
13, 2013 8:17 PM
To: gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V
Subject: [gomp4/cilkplus] C parsing for Cilk Plus #pragma simd
Hi Jakub. Hi folks.
Attached is a patch against the gomp4 branch implementing Cilk's #pragma
simd construct with the gomp4 infrastructure. I emit OMP_SIMD
Can someone please review this patch for us?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:32 AM
To: Joseph S. Myers
Cc: 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
Attached, please
Hello Everyone,
I am currently trying to build the GCC trunk (revision 198747) and it
is giving me the following error in make install for the java compiler. It
looks like it is not able to find a function.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
libtool: link:
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 11:52 AM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Richard Henderson; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [gomp4] Some progress
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 12:02 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Richard Henderson; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [gomp4] Some progress
/start.S:113
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Sincerely,
Balaji V. Iyer.
P.S. I downloaded GMP, MPFR and MPC using ./contrib/download_prerequisites.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 3:00 PM
To: 'g...@gcc.gnu.org'
Cc: 'Tobias Burnus (bur...@net-b.de
Hello Everyone,
The fortran compiler (f951) seem to hang even for a simple hello world
program in GCC. This is causing the whole gcc build process to hang at the
following line:
checking for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gfortran...
/export/users/gcc-svn/b-cilkplus-gcc/./gcc/gfortran
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Burnus [mailto:bur...@net-b.de]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 3:47 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: Re: Fortran Compiler Hangs
Hello Iyer,
Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
The fortran compiler (f951) seem to hang even for a simple
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 1:30 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Richard Henderson; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [gomp4] Some progress
Hello Aldy and Jakub,
Please see my response below.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 7:22 PM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Richard Henderson; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 9:55 AM
To: Aldy Hernandez
Cc: Richard Henderson; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Iyer, Balaji V
Subject: Re: [gomp4] Some progress on #pragma omp simd
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 05:05:03PM -0500
Hi Joseph et al.,
Did you all get a chance to look at this patch?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 9:56 AM
To: 'Joseph Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'
Cc: 'gcc-patches'
Subject: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 8:55 AM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Andrew Pinski; Tom Tromey; Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: libcpp: registering both
Hello Joseph,
Did you get a chance to look at this patch?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 5:58 PM
To: 'Joseph Myers'; 'Aldy Hernandez'
Cc: 'gcc-patches'
Subject: RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 5:55 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Updating svn.html
Hi Balaji,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
I would like to add
Hello Everyone,
I would like to add the following information about my cilkplus branch
under Language-specific in the SVN.html webpage. Do I send this as a patch or
is there a specific person I should contact with the information?
Here is the HTML code for what I want to add:
Hello,
I would like to add information about the Cilkplus branch into the
svn.html webpage. Here is the patch for it (I generated it using cvs diff -p
svn.html). Is this OK to commit? Am I sending this to the correct
location/mailing list?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
Index: svn.html
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 5:02 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'Joseph Myers'; 'gcc-patches'
Subject: Re: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
On 03
function.
+ * c-array-notation.c: New file.
+ * c-tree.h (is_cilkplus_reduce_builtin): Protoize.
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:07 PM
To: Joseph Myers; Aldy Hernandez
Cc: gcc-patches
Subject: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C
): Protoize.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 6:11 PM
To: Aldy Hernandez
Cc: gcc-patches; Iyer, Balaji V
Subject: Re: [cilkplus-merge] rewrite __sec_reduce* builtin handling to use
.def infrastructure
On Wed, 27
Not sure if this went out or not...
-Original Message-
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:25 AM
To: 'GCC Patches (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org)'
Subject: [patch][cilkplus-merge] Fix a bug in one of the test cases
Hello Everyone,
This patch will fix a bug
Yes, it looks OK.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:32 PM
To: gcc-patches; Iyer, Balaji V
Subject: [cilkplus-merge] Handle generic pretty printing of
ARRAY_NOTATION_REF
While debugging
Hello everyone,
I am trying to clone a git repository and I am getting the following
error. Can someone please tell me what this error could be and how I could fix
this? It worked for me a while back but not now.
I tried the following command:
git clone http://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
-Original Message-
From: Markus Trippelsdorf [mailto:mar...@trippelsdorf.de]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:16 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com)
Subject: Re: GIt Issue
On 2013.03.26 at 18:28 +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello
else that you mentioned.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:05 PM
To: Aldy Hernandez
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch] cilkplus array notation for C (clean
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] on behalf
of Mike Stump [m...@mrs.kithrup.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 6:36 PM
To: Aldy Hernandez
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Jeff Law; Joseph S. Myers; Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches
Subject
Balaji, please check the corresponding .sum files before and after your patch
to
make sure that the same number of tests are being tested. We have a nifty
script in contrib/compare_tests for this task.
That's how I verify it. (I grep for the ^FAIL in trunk and the applied branch
and make
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:09 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Jeff Law; Joseph S. Myers; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [patch] cilkplus array notation for C (clean, independent
patchset,
take 1)
On 03
Please see my response below:
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:25 AM
To: Joseph S. Myers
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [patch] cilkplus array notation for C (clean, independent
patchset,
take 1
HI Aldy, Joseph et al.,
Attached, please find a fixed patch. Please see my responses to Aldy's
questions below:
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:33 PM
To: Joseph S. Myers
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches
Hello Everyone,
This attached patch is for the Cilk Plus branch affecting the Cilk
Runtime. This patch should potentially allow the Cilk runtime library build for
non-x86 targets. We have tested this on ARM (trimslice machine) and it seem to
work on our test case. We encourage all the
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch that implements Array Notations for C++. This
patch affects the C++ compiler and should build (or be applied) on top of the
Array Notation for C patch (2 of n:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg01213.html). To my best knowledge,
I
201 - 300 of 463 matches
Mail list logo
