Hi Jan, hi Sebastian,
Can you explain why you decided to replace GBB_LOOPS with
loops_mapping?
Where there any shortcomings in my implementation or did you need some
different features?
I think we got confused about the existing implementation. The concern
was that a transform could
As the current code generation does not support conditional
statements,
we fail to generate code for them.
Who will work on that one?
I am working on this.
- Jan
I would like to reinterpret (not convert/cast) a 32-bit integer to a
32-bit float in GIMPLE. Is using a NOP_EXPR with the wanted type the
correct way of doing this?
The reinterpretation of a value is needed to optimize reads and writes
to unions. I modified the value numbering pass which worked
code. This work could be done in parallel. The
document mentions a GNU Virtual Machine. Would that be abandoned for a
tuple-like external representation?
Jan
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 2:39 AM
To: Sjodin, Jan
Cc
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 4:09 PM
To: Sjodin, Jan
Cc: Diego Novillo; Joseph S. Myers; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
On 5/1/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can
Hi I am new to GCC development and I have a few questions about LTO.
What has been done since the last status report in January? I would
also like to know what is most important to work on right now to make
progress on LTO (e.g. type system, intermediate representation,
reader/writer). What
Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi I am new to GCC development and I have a few questions about LTO.
What has been done since the last status report in January? I would
also like to know what is most important to work on right now to
make
progress on LTO (e.g. type system
-Original Message-
From: Joseph S. Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:07 PM
To: Diego Novillo
Cc: Sjodin, Jan; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: Also, LTO hasn't been merged
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Diego Novillo
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:26 PM
To: Sjodin, Jan
Cc: Joseph S. Myers; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
On 5/1/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED
