Re: Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it

2009-04-14 Thread Steve Ellcey
hat __INT_LEAST8_TYPE__ isn't defined. On HP-UX 11.23 where I use "wrap" I created a hpux-stdint.h file (like glibc-stdint.h and newlib-stdint.h) to use. I guess I need to use this on HP-UX 11.11 too, even though I am using "provide" instead of "wrap". Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com

Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it

2009-04-14 Thread Steve Ellcey
ovide a new header file for a given platform? Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com

c99 stdint.h question

2009-04-10 Thread Steve Ellcey
gned char' like it should be but I still get an error. Why? Is there some type promotion going on under the covers? Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com

Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released

2009-04-03 Thread Steve Ellcey
, and GMP 4.1.4 and had no failures. Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com

Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4

2009-03-23 Thread Steve Ellcey
C 4.4 is the last release with Itanium1 support"); > + warned_merced_deprecated = true; > + } > break; > } > if (i == pta_size) I will approve this patch, but it should say "Itanium1 tuning support" or something like that. The code will run on Itanium1, just not optimally. Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com

Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs

2009-01-27 Thread Steve Ellcey
uff.c not being compiled with -mcmodel=large? Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com

Re: x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs

2009-01-27 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:31 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Steve Ellcey writes: > > > because the crt files can't handle the large code model if they aren't > > compiled with this option. > > My understanding is that this would likely break old linkers which >

x86-64 and large code model questions/bugs

2009-01-26 Thread Steve Ellcey
nd set_got_offset_rex64 instructions and that later gets removed during optimization but I am not sure what to do about it. Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com

Re: IA64 HP-UX libtool / gcc question about shared libraries

2008-12-15 Thread Steve Ellcey
th this addition to gcc/config/ia64/hpux.h: #define DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \ "%{fopenmp:%{!static:%{!static-libgcc:-shared-libgcc}}}" This way any program that uses libgomp will also use the shared libgcc and the path to libgcc will be in the executable. Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com

IA64 HP-UX libtool / gcc question about shared libraries

2008-11-04 Thread Steve Ellcey
cations of doing this and that makes me a bit nervous. Any opinions or ideas on how (or where) this problem should be fixed? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Rewrite of tree level PRE and vect-67.c failure

2008-10-16 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:29 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > > Do we have a bug for these FAILs? Maybe we should add the analysis that > happened sofar. > > Richard. I have created PR 37853. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Rewrite of tree level PRE and vect-67.c failure

2008-10-15 Thread Steve Ellcey
least on IA64) at version r137631, which is the checkin for the tree level PRE rewrite that was done back in July. That checkin mentions some known pre-* test regressions that would happen for a while but I didn't see any mention of vect-67.c. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C

2008-10-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
_call_profiler to compare the actual function addresses > the testcase works as expected. > > Andreas. Does that mean you have a patch? I tried changing __gcov_indirect_call_profiler but got nowhere. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C

2008-10-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
t_call_profiler (if I am reading the x86 code correctly) but on IA64 I don't see anything that writes to __gcov_indirect_call_callee. There is already a defect for this bug, PR 32277, I may just add what I have found to the PR and XFAIL the test like Richard suggested. It has never worked on

Help with IA64 profiling bug - g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C

2008-10-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
st to anyone who might know the profiling code to help me with some advise about what I should look at next or about how to go about fixing this bug. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IA64 HP-UX bug with C++ inline change (r138150)

2008-10-03 Thread Steve Ellcey
outputing _tcf_0 and things seem to work better. I will do a full bootstrap on this change and if that looks good submit a patch to gcc-patches. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry?

2008-07-24 Thread Steve Ellcey
point and that version number doesnt' seem to exist: $ svn update -r138077 svn: Target path does not exist At least I think that is what this error means. What is going on? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bad code generation on HPPA platform

2008-05-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
hange to loop-invariant.c, though that change should be preserving REG_POINTER's during optimization not preventing them. I have tested a port of Peter's changes (already on the main line) to the 4.3 branch. It does fix the problem and it causes no regressions on hppa. My current inclination is to submit that patch to gcc-patches as a backport to the branch. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bad code generation on HPPA platform

2008-05-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
ight, the use of r8 and r19 in the ldw instruction are switched around. And in fact, when I created an assembly language file, swapped them around by hand, and then assembled the result and built an executable, everything seemed to work OK (I did not get a segfault). Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bad code generation on HPPA platform

2008-05-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
at patch since it seems to be related to the other changes. I will include it in my 4.3 branch testing. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bad code generation on HPPA platform

2008-05-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
bout the idea of putting Peter's patch (with the revert) on the 4.3 branch as a way to fix the HPPA bad code generation bug. I am going to test that patch on the branch and verify that it fixes my SPEC/GCC failure. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bad code generation on HPPA platform

2008-05-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
> From: Peter Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:45 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > I have found that this problem does not occur on the ToT sources and > > that the problem went away with this patch: > > > > 2008-04-07 Peter Bergner

Re: Bad code generation on HPPA platform

2008-05-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
> Steve Ellcey wrote: > > I am investigating a bad code generation bug on the 64 bit HPPA platform > > with GCC 4.3.0 and would like some help and/or ideas on how to analyze > > and fix it. The failing test is the SPEC 2000 GCC benchmark (version > > 2.7.2.2) and I h

Bad code generation on HPPA platform

2008-05-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
7;t seem to cause bootstrap problems it does seem to cause problems when building the older GCC version that is in SPEC2000. Any advise on how to proceed from here? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc.dg/sms-antideps.c fails on IA64 (modulo scheduling problem)

2007-08-17 Thread Steve Ellcey
e larger problem of possibly generating a subtract instruction on a register (count_reg) that does not allow that operation. Ideas or advise (or patches)? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Question about PR tree-optimization/32941, bootstrap failure, qsort

2007-08-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
eue actually ever long enough that this would affect the compilation time? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)

2007-08-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
options are required for the effective-target check. > > Janis Thanks, I'll change the order and see how things look in tonight's testing. Assuming it goes well I'll send an official patch tomorrow. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)

2007-08-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
ctive-target up? > Most of the effective target checks use C code. I think it's safe > to assume that the build or install tree being tested will always > have a C compiler available. OK. I wasn't sure if it should work or not. I certainly built C as well as C++ and Fortran

GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)

2007-08-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
se this test in gfortran.dg? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Failing matrix tests

2007-07-12 Thread Steve Ellcey
ims: 3, Flattened 3 dimensions mem_init () { Andrew, I cc'ed you because of this email <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-06/msg00232.html>, it mentions some matrix failures on MIPS when testing on the PTR-PLUS branch. I don't actually know if my failures are related to P

Re: Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c

2007-07-12 Thread Steve Ellcey
> Feel free to either (a) #ifdef out the first part of the test on IA64, > or (b) delete the first part of the test altogether. Since it fails on other platforms (b) seems like the better alternative. OK to checkin this patch? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-12 Steve Ellcey &

Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c

2007-07-11 Thread Steve Ellcey
the function address does appear to be aligned on a 256 byte boundry, the function descriptor has its normal 8 byte alignment. My question is, should function descriptors have the same alignment as functions or is this just an invalid test on systems that use function descriptors? Steve Ellcey [E

Help on testsuite failures, only with optimization & bootstrap

2007-06-26 Thread Steve Ellcey
mendations on how to debug this problem? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants

2007-06-18 Thread Steve Ellcey
ase q for quad functions like sqrtq). I don't think this is a standard, but it is a precedent. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants

2007-06-18 Thread Steve Ellcey
e the 'W' suffix for a __float80 constant on HP-UX. HP-UX also uses a lower case 'w' in math names for functions (e.g. sqrtw) for __float80 functions. Since __float128 == long double on HP-UX we can just use 'L' and 'l' for those. None of which helps on Linux. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mainline fails to build?

2007-05-15 Thread Steve Ellcey
get rid of the unsigned_type langhook. Looks like he is already working on a partial revert to fix the problem. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00958.html Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC: obsolete __builtin_apply?

2007-04-27 Thread Steve Ellcey
Andrew, are you still planning on applying the libobjc patch that removes the use of __builtin_apply? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How to handle g++.dg/warn/multiple-overflow-warn-3.C failure

2007-04-26 Thread Steve Ellcey
x27;s but I think that might negate what the test is trying to check since there would be no implicit conversions in the code any more and the test would probably never have given multiple overflow warnings in the first case. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Test g++.dg/warn/multiple-overflow

Problem with patch for PR tree-optimization/29789

2007-04-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
en if I build bootstrap. If I build a non-bootstrap compiler then the applu test compiles and runs fine. If I build a bootstrap compiler, I can compile applu but the program core dumps when run. Do you have any ideas about what might be happening or what I might try in order to understand wha

Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks

2007-04-23 Thread Steve Ellcey
an aligned attribute on it. If the buffer isn't aligned the perlbench program fails. I believe another problem was an uninitialized local variable in a Fortran program, but I don't recall which program or which variable that was. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture

2007-04-20 Thread Steve Ellcey
question of making it easier to reproduce a -O2 bug that happens on one machine on a different one too so it is easier to find and fix? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libgfortran Makefile question (using latest libtool)

2007-03-21 Thread Steve Ellcey
t any --tags options in Makefile.in, but if I run automake in the tree where I have the latest libtool then I see the --tag option used. So I guess just rerunning automake is sufficient to fix this problem. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libgfortran Makefile question (using latest libtool)

2007-03-21 Thread Steve Ellcey
use of --tag in the libtool config output (nor do I see where the -MD, -MP, -MF flags are coming from). Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] % ./libtool --config | grep -e LT -e CC -e tag LTCC="/proj/opensrc/sje/svn.libtool/build-ia64-hp-hpux11.23-trunk/obj_gcc/./gcc/xgcc -B/proj/opensrc/sje/

libgfortran Makefile question (using latest libtool)

2007-03-21 Thread Steve Ellcey
M_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(AM_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) But libgfortran doesn't have a line like this so how is it coming up with this compile line? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFC: obsolete __builtin_apply?

2007-03-16 Thread Steve Ellcey
ibobjc was changed then we could put in a depreciated message on these builtins for 4.3 and maybe remove them for 4.4. Comments? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Updating libtool in GCC and srctree

2007-03-13 Thread Steve Ellcey
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:03:52PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > configure:15448: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_GCJdnl > > Where'd that come from? Wherever it is, it's a bug. Maybe someone > checked in a typo to the configure file. "dnl"

Re: Updating libtool in GCC and srctree

2007-03-12 Thread Steve Ellcey
ly undefined). I think I want the -I options though. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Updating libtool in GCC and srctree

2007-03-09 Thread Steve Ellcey
> Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > $ aclocal > > autom4te: unknown language: Autoconf-without-aclocal-m4 > > aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 1 > > Looks like you have an out-of-date autom4te.cache. > > Andreas. I removed autom

Re: Updating libtool in GCC and srctree

2007-03-09 Thread Steve Ellcey
some acinclude.m4 files have explicit includes for libtool files (libgfortran, libgomp, etc) but other's don't (libffi, gcc). Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here is what I have done so far in the src/binutils tree: Top level src tree ChangeLog: 2007-03-09 Steve Ellcey &l

Re: Updating libtool in GCC and srctree

2007-03-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
ing to <http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Distributing> we shouldn't need libtool.m4 in our package. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Updating libtool in GCC and srctree

2007-03-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
in:20: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_DISABLE_SHARED I tried changing the macros to AC_* but that didn't help, should I just use m4_pattern_allow or am I missing a bigger picture here? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bootstrap failure on real-install-headers-cpio

2007-03-02 Thread Steve Ellcey
Has anyone seen this bootstrap failure? I only get it on my hppa*-hp-hpux* builds, not on ia64-hp-hpux* or on Linux builds. I assume it is related to the include-fixed changes but I don't know why I only get it for some platforms. I get it with parallel and non-parallel builds. Steve E

store_expr, expr_size, and C++

2007-02-26 Thread Steve Ellcey
;t look like there is an answer yet. Anyone have some ideas on this problem? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Running GCC tests on installed compiler

2007-01-12 Thread Steve Ellcey
built GCC seems to be picking up an extra .exp file (default.exp) but I am not sure why or how to fix it so that my non-built compiler runs the same way. Can someone help me out here? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3

2006-12-11 Thread Steve Ellcey
until the patch is reverted or the correct fix is done. Do you know if there a GCC bug report for this defect? I couldn't find one in bugzilla. I am seeing this problem with IA64 HP-UX on ToT. I tried the workaround you gave and that makes IA64 HP-UX work but causes other platforms to fail so I am wondering when there will be a real fix for this bootstrap problem. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Configuration question

2006-11-15 Thread Steve Ellcey
d my top-level change (went back to autoconf 2.14) the libstdc++ configure worked correctly and the right GCC was used by AC_TRY_COMPILE. Most perplexing. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ICE while bootstrapping trunk on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00

2006-11-15 Thread Steve Ellcey
hanged if (bound) to if (cp && cp->value) and set bound inside the if but now I am dying when compiling decNumber.c so I don't have a bootstrap working yet. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Configuration question

2006-11-10 Thread Steve Ellcey
he new GCC when checking things with AC_TRY_COMPILE. Or is this just not possible? Is this why some tests don't use AC_TRY_COMPILE but say "Fake what AC_TRY_COMPILE does"? See acinclude.m4 for these comments, there is no explanation about why it is faking what AC_TRY_COMPILE d

Re: GCC 4.3 Platform List

2006-09-21 Thread Steve Ellcey
vailable on hppa and ia64 machines so any OS issues found while testing on hppa might actually affect both hppa and ia64. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2006-09-05 Thread Steve Ellcey
us [remote_wait $dest 300]' to 'set status [remote_wait $dest 2000]' It may not be the right way to do it but it has worked for me. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make check glitch

2006-08-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
-target_board 'unix{-mlp64,-milp32}" to "--target_board 'unix{,-mlp64}" and had problems. I notice that HJ's example has the -m32 in the first position, not the last. Jack, does it work for you if you use "unix{-m64,}" instead of "unix{,-m64}"? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory

2006-07-10 Thread Steve Ellcey
get no errors or warnings when running aclocal. Thanks for the tip. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory

2006-07-10 Thread Steve Ellcey
I am trying to make a configure change in the libstdc++-v3 directory but when I run aclocal (even on an unmodified libstdc++-v3 directory from the top-of-tree), I get an error message. Does anyone else see this? [hpsje] $ aclocal aclocal:configure.ac:85: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not foun

Re: PATCH: Update src/intl from gcc/intl

2006-05-19 Thread Steve Ellcey
you do now. intl changes even less than libiberty does. The src version of intl has 4 changes since January of 2002. The GCC version has 8 changes since Zack put the gettext 0.12.1 version in back in July 2003. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PATCH: Update src/intl from gcc/intl

2006-05-19 Thread Steve Ellcey
e new intl directory with no problems and I am willing to try and fix any problems caused by the change if other platforms have problems with it. 2006-05-19 Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * MAINTAINERS: Change intl updating instructions. * config.rpath: Copy fr

Re: intl directory: gcc vs. src

2006-05-16 Thread Steve Ellcey
any suggestions as to what products or platforms might cause problems? I did get one reply from a combined-tree user who said they used the gcc version of intl when building things in a combined-tree. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: intl directory: gcc vs. src

2006-05-16 Thread Steve Ellcey
I wouldn't need to do any actual checkins for those changes. If we can do that then the only thing I would need to change by hand would be the intl text that is in the MAINTAINERS file. Who maintains this automatic merge process? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

intl directory: gcc vs. src

2006-05-11 Thread Steve Ellcey
, and if so, which one should be used? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC & libtool - plans for moving to libtool 1.5?

2006-03-17 Thread Steve Ellcey
CTED] (CodeSourcery mail) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs) So when we finally do move to a newer libtool we will move to the unreleased libtool main line? I guess I was assuming we would move to a stable released libtool, but that was just an assumption on my part. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC & libtool - plans for moving to libtool 1.5?

2006-03-17 Thread Steve Ellcey
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:59:26PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > > I was wondering if there are any plans to move the libtool that is in > > the GCC tree to 1.5? The current libtool in GCC appears to be based on > > the 1.4 version and the real libtool pr

GCC & libtool - plans for moving to libtool 1.5?

2006-03-17 Thread Steve Ellcey
ry has the necessary dependent libraries linked in to it when it is built. I could fix this on the 1.4 branch but I am guessing that libtool doesn't really want 1.4 fixes anymore and the problem is already handled on the 1.5 branch so I was wondering if there are plans to move GCC to a 1.5 libt

Re: Linking with libgomp (ia64-hp-hpux11.23)

2006-03-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
> From: Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:32:01AM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > | ld: (Warning) Symbol "__udivsi3" is not exported but is imported by a > > shared library > > | ld: (Warning) Symbol "__divsi3"

Linking with libgomp (ia64-hp-hpux11.23)

2006-03-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
have libgomp built with the -lgcc_s option. Any Help/Advice? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Anonymous (read-only) GCC SVN access through a firewall

2006-02-09 Thread Steve Ellcey
OK, I got it now. I edited ~/.subversion/servers and set http-proxy-host and http-proxy-port and now things are working. I will continue to use svn+ssh for my own work but it nice to know how to do it with http when needed. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Anonymous (read-only) GCC SVN access through a firewall

2006-02-09 Thread Steve Ellcey
to server > > (http://gcc.gnu.org) > > It works here. Are you obliged to use a proxy server? > > Ben Yes, I have to use a proxy server on my web browser. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Anonymous (read-only) GCC SVN access through a firewall

2006-02-09 Thread Steve Ellcey
request failed on '/svn/gcc/trunk' svn: PROPFIND of '/svn/gcc/trunk': could not connect to server (http://gcc.gnu.org) Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anonymous (read-only) GCC SVN access through a firewall

2006-02-09 Thread Steve Ellcey
gcc.gnu.org) doesn't have a way to use ssh to access the GCC tree. Is that correct? So how does he or she do a checkout if the above method doesn't work due to a firewall? Are they just out of luck? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8

2006-01-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
ata.c: In function 'print_reservation': insn-automata.c:22466: warning: string length '669' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support make[3]: *** [insn-automata.o] Error 1 And when I look at the options used to compile insn-automata.c I see -Werror but no subsequent -Wno-error. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8

2006-01-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
ble to > fix any issues immediatley if they pop up. > > So, Steve, if you do not mind, would you please commit if you get the > approval? OK, I will submit this (with a ChangeLog) to gcc-patches and commit it if/when approved. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8

2006-01-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
you go ahead and submit it when your testing is done. If you don't want to submit it, I can do it. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8

2006-01-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:01:17PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > > I took Zack's advice and put all the includes from insn-attrtab.c into > > insn-automata.c. My current problem is that I get: > > > > | insn-automata.c: In function 'print_reserva

Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8

2006-01-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
> > I still get implicitly declared errors for a couple of functions declared > > in ia64-protos.h. I think the patch needs to be expanded to include > > tm_p.h in addition to tm.h. I am testing that now. > > Shall I help? I have a fast sunfire here where I can cross check. > > I wait until you

Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8

2006-01-25 Thread Steve Ellcey
on to tm.h. I am testing that now. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local

2006-01-17 Thread Steve Ellcey
ROTECTED] You can stop this by specifying --with-local-prefix=/not-usr-local when configuring GCC. I have built a GCC into a location like /be by specifying both --prefix=/be and --with-local-prefix=/be This GCC does not look in /usr/local/include (but does search /be/include). Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

GCC 3.4.5 status?

2005-12-05 Thread Steve Ellcey
see a gcc_3_4_5_release tag in the SVN tags directory. I also notice we have a "Releases" link under "About GCC" in the top left corner of the main GCC page that doesn't look like it has been updated in quite a while for any releases. Should this be updated or removed? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GMP on IA64-HPUX

2005-12-05 Thread Steve Ellcey
piler. > > Richard. FYI: What I do to compile gmp on IA64 HP-UX is to configure gmp with '--host=none --target=none --build=none'. This avoids all the target specific code. I am sure the performance stinks this way but since it is used by the compiler and not in the run-time I haven&#

Re: Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?

2005-11-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
hat if I compile using 3.4.4 and use '-shared -shared-libgcc' instead of just '-shared' then it works as you want. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64

2005-10-27 Thread Steve Ellcey
as +Onofltacc. +Ofltacc=strict Disallows any floating point optimization that can result in numerical differences. This is the same as +Ofltacc. It would be easy enough to add an option that turned off the use of the fused multiply and add in GCC but I would hate to see its use turned off by default. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Subversion and firewalls question

2005-10-18 Thread Steve Ellcey
> > Currently I get: > > > > | /usr/local/bin/svn co svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org:/svn/gcc/trunk > > | ssh: gcc.gnu.org:: no address associated with hostname. > > | svn: Connection closed unexpectedly > > This one might easy. > > You added a : at the end of gc

Subversion and firewalls question

2005-10-18 Thread Steve Ellcey
e an GNU Socks package I can build? I see Dante, is that what I want? Is using --with-socks on my subversion build the right way to be attacking this problem? I am trying to get this to work from my HP-UX box, if that makes a difference. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC

2005-10-10 Thread Steve Ellcey
d want to put the info out before optimizing tree-ssa since you would hope that the IPO data from other modules would let you do better tree-ssa optimizations. > I do not know whether these two questions are already answered or not. I don't think anything has been answered yet. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC

2005-10-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Request for testsuite help (gcc.dg/compat)

2005-09-21 Thread Steve Ellcey
figure out how to get gcc.dg-struct-layout-1_generate to stop generating this type. Even after looking at Jakubs patch that fixed the other layout failures, I haven't been able to come up with a fix. Can anyone help me with this? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2005-08-31 Thread Steve Ellcey
a timing report based on the 4.0.0 compiler it looks like half the compile time is spent in the phase "dominance frontiers". I will investigate some more. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c)

2005-08-30 Thread Steve Ellcey
time a compile is given and where this limit is set? By hand, I can compile the test in about 3 1/2 minutes on the machine in question (the machine may have been busier when the failure occured and thus taken longer). Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX

2005-07-03 Thread Steve Ellcey
> Steve Ellcey defined MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK when he first implemented > the ia64-hpux port. At the time, I mentioned using PARALLELs was a > better solution, but this was a simpler way for him to get the initial > port working. Since then, there have been a lot of bug fixes to

Re: vector alignment question

2005-06-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:50:32PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > I noticed that vectors are always aligned based on their size, i.e. an > > 8 byte vector has an aligment of 8 bytes, 16 byte vectors an alignment > > of 16, a 256 byte vector an alignment of 256, etc. &g

vector alignment question

2005-06-08 Thread Steve Ellcey
vectors. This prevents ABI changes depending on whether or not native vector modes are supported. */ TYPE_ALIGN (type) = tree_low_cst (TYPE_SIZE (type), 0); so it seems to be intentional, but it still seems odd to me, especially for very large vectors. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction

2005-05-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
urcery, LLC Nope. GCC doesn't like seeing two match_operand's for op 0. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How can I write an empty conversion instruction

2005-05-06 Thread Steve Ellcey
"" "" [(set_attr "itanium_class" "ignore") (set_attr "predicable" "no") (set_attr "empty" "yes")]) I think the match_dup may be wrong since I am using it with SF but the original match_operand has DF. Do I need to make this modeless? Or is there some other way to create an empty conversion instruction. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2   3   4   >