Build Failure for gcc-4.3-20071109

d is a log of my build attempt (and the config.log). It looks to me as if libiberty is getting compiled and tested Ok, but, for some reason, make reports an error which then prevents a good build completion. Can anyone tell what is happening or suggest the next step? Thanks. -Tom Tom Browder

Re: Build Failure for gcc-4.3-20071109

On Nov 15, 2007 6:24 PM, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Browder wrote: > > Attached is a log of my build attempt (and the config.log). ... > These lines in the output are suspect: > /bin/sh: /usr/bin/true: Success > I don't have a /usr/bin/true on my F7 ma

Re: Build Failure for gcc-4.3-20071109 [SOLVED]

Thanks to Jim Wilson's help, I eliminated a non-standard file, /usr/bin/true, which was interfering with gcc scripts. Now everything is fine with gcc building. -Tom Tom Browder Niceville, Florida USA

-Wconversion bug in g++-4.3?

ion f.cc: In function 'void f(unsigned char)': f.cc:3: warning: conversion to 'unsigned char' from 'int' may alter its value Is this a legitimate warning or a bug? If so, is there anything to be done to eliminate the warning while retaining "-Wconversion&quo

Re: -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3?

On Nov 22, 2007 10:46 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22/11/2007, Tom Browder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Compile with g++ 4.3-20071109: ... > There is something odd going on, so please open a bug report and add > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CC li

Re: -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3?

On Nov 22, 2007 8:30 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:02:31AM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > > For this testcase: ... > > unsigned short c = b & 0xff; > The type of (b & 0xff) is int. However, the value is bounded, and must be In a similar case with unsi

How to Properly Set a Tree Member Variable

I'm trying to help Tim Josling get the old gcc cobol front end code working with the gcc trunk again. I'm struggling with trying to learn usage of tree macros while dealing with code dating from about gcc 3.2 or so. I have the following lines of code: tree parm_decl; ... /* the following two

Re: How to Properly Set a Tree Member Variable

On Jan 27, 2008 11:11 AM, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Andreas" == Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > >> /* the following two lines give a gcc error: lvalue required as left > >> operand of assignment */ > >> DECL_SOURCE_FILE (parm_decl) = local_input_filename; > >>

Volunteer for a Beginner's Project: Header-Header Interdependencies

I am interested in working on the subject project: Development-> Open projects-> projects for beginner GCC hackers-> General code cleanliness-> Disentangle the current web of header-header interdependencies. My motivation: the problems a newbie faces when trying

Patch Testing Requirements

d treelang, too? Or just the languages enabled by default? -Tom Tom Browder Niceville, Florida USA

How to Avoid Executing a Front End's testsuite

fix the GCC build/configure system for this situation? Thanks. -Tom Tom Browder Niceville, Florida USA

Database for GCC

A naive thought, perhaps: Would there be any advantage to using a key-value embedded database program for the voluminous maps needed for gcc optimization, etc.? If so, consider . I have used its predecessor, qdbm, for years and it was very fast. TC is faster

gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

ris2.11" I had problems later building ppl and cloog to incorporate into g++. I have asked about this on the gcc-help mailing list. -Tom Tom Browder Niceville, Florida USA

Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> A successful build on Open Solaris 2008.11: >> >> $../gcc-4.4.0/config.guess >> i386-pc-solaris2.11 >> >> $ gcc-4.4.0t -v >> Using built-in specs. >> Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11 >> Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.0/configure >> --enable-langua

Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: ... >>> well done, do you have a full testsuite report ? Well, Dennis, I have problems running the testsuite. I think I'm missing some of the prereqs, so it will be a while. I'll report back unless someone finishes first.. -Tom

Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> Attached is a shortened test report with the following lines removed: >> > > excellent, now we have a benchmark/comparison to look at. Well done, > excellent work. > > What did you use to build libgmp and mpfr ? I am curious because most >

Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 18:28, Janis Johnson wrote: ... > The preferred way to post test results is by running the script > $SRC/contrib/test_summary from within the build directory.  It > produces a summary in the form of a script which will mail that > summary to gcc-testresu...@gcc.gnu.org, whe

Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:39, Janis Johnson wrote: Thanks to Janis, Andrew, and David. I see inside the script all you say, but it seems to be throwing up on some ill-formed screen output from some of the tests, e.g., gawk: cmd. line:50: { next; } gawk: cmd. line:50: ^ `next' used in E

Re: Problems with upstream versions of gmp, mpfr, and mpc [Was: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2]

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:43, NightStrike wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> I'm very sceptical about "or any later version" instructions when >>> building the gcc prerequisites.  In practice this can never be certain >>> to work, because the upstream maintainers

gcc-4.5.1 failing test: FAIL: abi_check

I posted this earlier on gcc-help but no solutions that worked. After a good build of gcc-4.5.1 I did 'make check' (several times now). I only get one failure for languages c,c++,fortran. Portion of test results showing failure: Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp a

gcc bugzilla upgrade

I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while. Can anyone give me a current address for him or another dev's name who I can work with? Thanks. Regards, -Tom Thomas M. Browder, Jr. Niceville, Florida USA

Re: gcc bugzilla upgrade

2010/9/7 Gerald Pfeifer : > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tom Browder wrote: >> I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's >> guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while. ... > I thought Frédéric Buclin (copied) is now working > on thi

Re: gcc

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 09:13, xie pan wrote: > i want a a gcc Can you be more specific?