http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #13 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-03-04 05:50:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I start to believe we should arrange for --disable-werror for any non-standard
build config ... testing matrix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56295
Bug #: 56295
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56295
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-02-12 11:02:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 29423
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29423
Three other testcases
These are unrelated testcases which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56297
Bug #: 56297
Summary: LTO: multiple definition error with global register
variables
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56295
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-02-12 16:26:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 29425
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29425
Modified testcase
This slightly modified testcase still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47900
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56232
Bug #: 56232
Summary: Missed optimization with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56233
Bug #: 56233
Summary: Bugzilla: files (*.c, *.diff, etc.) wrongly recognized
as application/octet-stream
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56233
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-02-07 02:49:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 29379
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29379
Create New Attachment form
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56233
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-02-07 03:34:21 UTC ---
There is not much bugzilla can do.
It could either ignore mime type as sent by the browser, or show the Content
Type section.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56233
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-02-07 03:37:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 29381
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29381
Enter Bug form (w/o javascript)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56167
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-02-01 16:21:58 UTC ---
No idea why you consider the rest as bugs.
The diagnostic messages are somewhat confusing. I believe that `weakref', by
analogy with `alias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56167
Bug #: 56167
Summary: ICE with invalid __attribute__ arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56168
Bug #: 56168
Summary: [4.8 Regression] GCC seems to disregard -fno-builtin
when compiling with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56147
Bug #: 56147
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in
lto_symtab_merge_decls_1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56147
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-30 10:54:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I don't think we necessarily want to support this fully...
Are such bug reports useful, or it's just a nuisance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-30 13:39:37 UTC ---
The other way around, compiling and installing with
-O2 but then at link time use -O0 -g to get a debug
build is more questionable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56062
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-24 14:58:58 UTC ---
Yes, it is not a very important thing, but it should not be harder to maintain
then -fuse-ld=bfd, -fuse-ld=gold options. It is not like I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059
Bug #: 56059
Summary: SIGSEGV on invalid C++11 code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56060
Bug #: 56060
Summary: ICE on invalid code in type_dependent_expression_p, at
cp/pt.c:19742
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061
Bug #: 56061
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at
ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-21 06:31:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 29232
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29232
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56060
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-21 06:31:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 29233
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29233
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56062
Bug #: 56062
Summary: Enhance -fuse-ld= option
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-15 23:47:58 UTC ---
Hmm, can't reproduce what your issue is here actual.
The issue is that --enable-stdcall-fixup only works with plain object files and
does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55750
Bug #: 55750
Summary: [4.8 Regression] :-( in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at
expr.c:7646
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55750
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-12-20 05:55:22 UTC ---
Tried i686-pc-linux-gnu, i686-w64-mingw32.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525
Bug #: 55525
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have
pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6768
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28826|application/octet-stream
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-11-29 03:07:21 UTC ---
4.8.0:
In file included from :0:0:
1.c:3:6: warning: type of 's' does not match original declaration [enabled by
default]
char s[8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55390
Bug #: 55390
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Error when building with -mfpmath=sse
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48983
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-11-15 19:26:38 UTC ---
And this is not particularly useful: lto1: fatal error: short write.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55242
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-11-09 20:23:47 UTC ---
It's a feature, not a bug (see PR41748, PR45696, and PR48383). Perhaps it
should be mentioned in the preprocessor documentation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55130
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48427
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38226
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55130
Bug #: 55130
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in insn_rhs_dead_pseudo_p, at
lra-constraints.c:3224
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-30 01:14:47 UTC ---
A dup of PR54957 / PR55014.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102
Bug #: 55102
Summary: The options -flto and -On do not behave as described
in GCC docs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094
Bug #: 55094
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start,
at dwarf2cfi.c:2224
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #15 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-23 21:16:37 UTC ---
Mingw32 target, GCC 4.8.0 20121021 (experimental).
$ cat bug.cc
struct S {
~S();
};
int main()
{
S s1, s2, s3, s4, s5, s6, s7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54981
Bug #: 54981
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Different code generated with /
without `-g'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-11 07:06:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 28417
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28417
Testcase
Compile with `g++ -g -O1 -flto -flto-partition
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-11 07:07:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 28418
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28418
Backtrace with -O0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-11 07:08:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 28419
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28419
Backtrace with -O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-10 06:13:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 28409
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28409
Testcase #2
Another testcase. Compile with `-O2 -funswitch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54877
Bug #: 54877
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected
ssa_name, have real_cst in copy_ssa_name_fn, at
tree-ssanames.c:335
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54877
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-06 07:57:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 28369
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28369
Testcase #2
Another (perhaps related) issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-06 08:02:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28370
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28370
Testcase #3
Undefined reference bug.
With gold
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
Bug #: 54824
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-05 11:47:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 28362
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28362
Testcase
GCC 20120923 (r191654) - fails, 20120916 (r191367
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-04 09:46:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 28355
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28355
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
Bug #: 54790
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Missing optimization with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Bug #: 54789
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining
GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499
Bug #: 54499
Summary: GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure
while assembling generated .s file
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-09-06 00:03:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 28139
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28139
Code generated by GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50147
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-05-16 10:04:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 27418
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27418
Bt from GCC 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50147
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52399
Bug #: 52399
Summary: With `-flto', `-Wno-clobbered' does not suppress the
might be clobbered warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51726
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-01-23 20:22:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 26437
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26437
Patch (not tested)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-01-20 22:37:02 UTC ---
It looks like a GCC bug, not INVALID.
myVar[i] is replaced by constant zero in main().
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-01-16 16:54:43 UTC ---
Thus I don't see where is the issue.
The issue is a rather confusing error message. It looks as if there was a
compiler bug.
shall we close
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51859
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-01-16 17:39:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 26343
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26343
Testcase
I also experienced this bug.
`_Unwind_Resume' referenced
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51859
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-01-16 17:40:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26344
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26344
Testcase #2 (mingw32 target)
`_bar' referenced in section `.text
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-01-16 18:28:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
What's confusing about it, I don't understand.
There are two errors and notes, all pointing to the same source location
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-01-12 10:53:44 UTC ---
I already mentioned PCH and .H extension, but just to be 100% clear, the
error happens only when compiling the testcase as a c++ header.
Reproduced
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51843
Bug #: 51843
Summary: ICE with LTO and attribute `dllimport'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827
Bug #: 51827
Summary: Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration,
with PCH/LTO/C++11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-01-01 15:33:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The linker does not work very well with undecorated stdcall-s. For example:
http://sourceware.org/PR13495. But if that bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51726
Bug #: 51726
Summary: LTO and attribute 'selectany'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-12-14 15:45:29 UTC ---
Filed a linker bug http://sourceware.org/PR13497.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-12-14 05:17:04 UTC ---
PR 50148.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-12-14 06:02:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 26075
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26075
Two resolution files
Here you are.
The resolution files differ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-12-12 21:43:15 UTC ---
Recent GCC 4.7.0 works with both testcases. GCC 4.6.3 still fails on the 1st.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48427
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-12-12 21:43:38 UTC ---
I can't reproduce the bug with recent GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
Bug #: 51523
Summary: LTO keeps unneeded functions (mingw32 target)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
Bug #: 51417
Summary: Cross-compiler - wrappers for ar, nm, ranlib installed
under wrong names
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-10-26 19:21:11 UTC ---
Works with recent trunk. Fixed in r179424 (PR 47247)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-10-26 19:30:50 UTC ---
Disappeared in trunk between rr. 178135 and 178749.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-10-26 19:36:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 25620
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25620
Testcase
Still fails with this testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-10-24 20:10:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 25598
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25598
Another testcase
Compile it with `gcc -O3 -flto -nostdlib -r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706
Bug #: 50706
Summary: Fold check failed (expected tree that contains 'typed'
structure, have 'block' in fold_checksum_tree, at
fold-const.c:13921)
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-10-12 17:10:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25476
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25476
Small testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-10-12 17:10:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 25477
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25477
Backtrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
--- Comment #13 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-09-24 10:39:28 UTC ---
Thanks!
It would be nice to fix it in binutils and in gdb as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35261
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-09-18 23:54:58 UTC ---
4.3 is not maintained -- should this bug be closed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452
Bug #: 50452
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error:
verify_flow_info failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-09-19 00:57:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 25313
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25313
Backtrace in GDB
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-09-19 00:58:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 25314
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25314
Another testcase (compile with -O2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-09-19 00:59:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 25315
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25315
Another backtrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50226
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-09-14 19:35:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 25274
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25274
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38101
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
101 - 200 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
