--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #48 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #33 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31797
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31809
--- Comment #35 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-08 22:05
---
Ian Taylor suggests:
The way to fix this is to add a HOST_HOOKS_GT_PCH_GET_ADDRESS to
host-solaris.c. That hook should try to allocate the space in some
address area that is normally free on Solaris. See
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30052
--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-02 21:59
---
If this is a valid program, as we seem to think it is, then this is a serious
bug. However, if it's the front-end bug that Richard suspects, there's not
much we can do about it in the near term. The ball
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-30 19:51
---
I think this probably qualifies as a regression, given Stephen's comment #9,
but not an important one. With all of GCC's optimization options, if we start
worrying about regressions for things outside the {-O0
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31743
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31747
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31748
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31749
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31751
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 03:29
---
Subject: Bug 31388
Author: mmitchel
Date: Thu Apr 26 03:29:43 2007
New Revision: 124172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124172
Log:
PR c++/31388
* cp-tree.h (ARITHMETIC_TYPE
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 03:37
---
Subject: Bug 31338
Author: mmitchel
Date: Thu Apr 26 03:37:20 2007
New Revision: 124173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124173
Log:
Fix PR# in ChangeLog:
PR c++/31338
* cp
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 03:37
---
Fixed in 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30567
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31605
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-24 22:42
---
Zdenek, do you think this is appropriate for a backport to 4.2.0?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31360
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-24 22:43
---
Andrew, can you identify whatever portion of this patch has not yet been
applied to 4.2?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-24 22:46
---
Ulrich, in response to your question in Comment #6, yes, this bug appears in
4.1 and 4.2, not just in 4.3. So, if you think it's safe to backport the
reload patch, it would be nice to have the fix there as well
--- Comment #33 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-24 22:51
---
Geoff, do you intend to backport these Darwin patches to 4.2.0?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26792
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 18:49
---
Daniel asked me to look at this issue.
Andrew is correct:
b = a++;
is exactly equivalent to:
b = a.operator++(0);
It is completely up to the operator to implement the postfix semantics; it's
just
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-18 04:36
---
Subject: Bug 31513
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed Apr 18 04:36:18 2007
New Revision: 123939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123939
Log:
PR c++/31513
* call.c
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-18 04:44
---
Fixed in 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-17 00:28
---
Subject: Bug 31513
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Apr 17 00:28:21 2007
New Revision: 123902
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123902
Log:
PR c++/31513
* call.c
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-17 00:34
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30222
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 23:06
---
P2, rather than P1, because of the use of statement-expressions.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31338
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 23:10
---
I think we can all agree that this is an important bug, even if we're not all
agreed about exactly how to fix it. This seems likely be to a frequent
problem.
Therefore, despite the fact this is just a missed
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31411
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31419
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31446
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31448
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31498
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31513
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31517
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 18:05
---
Yes, this is OK for 4.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27869
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-09 20:46
---
Subject: Bug 31449
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Apr 9 20:45:53 2007
New Revision: 123679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123679
Log:
PR c++/31449
* class.c (build_base_path
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-09 20:51
---
Fixed in 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 04:01
---
Subject: Bug 31449
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Apr 10 04:01:08 2007
New Revision: 123690
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123690
Log:
PR c++/31449
* class.c (build_base_path
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 04:01
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 06:07
---
Subject: Bug 31449
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Apr 10 06:07:41 2007
New Revision: 123691
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123691
Log:
PR c++/31449
* class.c (build_base_path
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 06:07
---
Fixed in 4.1.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 03:09
---
I can confirm this issue, using both a GCC 4.1.x compiler and an FSF mainline
compiler on the most current (late 2006) release of Solaris 10. Sun's version
of GCC (based on GCC 3.4.3) as installed in /usr/sfw/bin
--- Comment #34 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 04:31
---
Just a confirmation that I see this test failing with GCC 4.1 on Solaris as
well. As Eric says in Comment #11, the symptoms are that, in host-solaris.c
the first call to mmap succeeds (but at the wrong address
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 01:44
---
Richard, are you able to confirm this bug?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 05:43
---
I agree with Joseph that STRIP_SIGN_NOPS should not be removing changes in
precision that may change the value and that, indeed, mode is probably being
used as an inaccurate proxy for precision.
--
http
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 15:00
---
What does the C standard say about calloc? That's a similar case; the
multiplication is in calloc. Does it have to report an error?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19351
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31074
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31136
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31150
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29609
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31187
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31260
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-22 23:22
---
Jim --
Your patch is correct. If you would care to test it, it's preapproved for
4.2/4.3. Otherwise, I will take care of it before the 4.2.0 release, as it's
certainly my fault.
Thanks,
-- Mark
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-22 23:34
---
Jason --
This appears to be fallout from your patch for PR c++/28407 and/or c++/28409.
Do you have time to take a look?
Thanks,
-- Mark
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 00:50
---
This code in lookup_template_class:
- /* Consider an example where a template template parameter declared as
-
- template class T, class U = std::allocatorT class TT
-
-The template
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 02:16
---
Jim --
I'm going to test your patch, and handle getting it checked in.
Thank you for your investigation.
-- Mark
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 04:26
---
Subject: Bug 31273
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Mar 23 04:26:13 2007
New Revision: 123149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123149
Log:
Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 04:31
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 04:31
---
Subject: Bug 31273
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Mar 23 04:31:21 2007
New Revision: 123150
URL: http
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 04:31
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 04:31
---
Subject: Bug 31273
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Mar 23 04:31:21 2007
New Revision: 123150
URL: http
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 04:36
---
Subject: Bug 30863
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Mar 23 04:36:33 2007
New Revision: 123151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123151
Log:
PR c++/30863
* parser.c
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 04:37
---
Subject: Bug 30863
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Mar 23 04:37:40 2007
New Revision: 123152
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123152
Log:
PR c++/30863
* parser.c
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 04:37
---
Fixed in 4.2.0, 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-13 23:49
---
Subject: Bug 30899
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Mar 13 23:48:49 2007
New Revision: 122888
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122888
Log:
PR bootstrap/30899
* Make-lang.in (doc/g
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-13 23:50
---
Fixed in 4.2.0, 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-13 23:51
---
Subject: Bug 30899
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Mar 13 23:51:07 2007
New Revision: 122890
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122890
Log:
PR bootstrap/30899
* Make-lang.in (doc/g
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 16:24
---
Subject: Bug 30108
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Mar 12 16:24:18 2007
New Revision: 122844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122844
Log:
PR c++/30108
* call.c (convert_default_arg
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 18:07
---
Subject: Bug 30108
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Mar 12 18:07:33 2007
New Revision: 122848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122848
Log:
PR c++/30108
* call.c (convert_default_arg
--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 18:09
---
Fixed in 4.2.0, 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 18:27
---
Danny, please apply the patch to 4.2.0.
Thanks,
-- Mark
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28544
801 - 900 of 4505 matches
Mail list logo
