On 4/4/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> Hello Joshi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>>>> HI,
>>>> Discussing the project wi
On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello Joshi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> HI,
>> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please
>> review and suggest
>> necessary changes.
>> If some OpenMP experts from GCC have
,
Sameeran Joshi.
On 3/26/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> That is a correct diagnostics.
>>
>> See Canonical loop form.
>>
>> test-exprOne of the following:
>> var relational-op b
>> b relational-op var
>>
>> ( var relational-op b )
>> is neither of those.
>
> Still se
On 3/26/19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:41:26PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> sameeran joshi writes:
>>
>> > On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> >>> 1) che
On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
>> 1.no returns in block
>
> returns should be allowed inside
block ;//is it good if not initialized in constructor?
+ bool IsStructured ;
+//member functions
+ void set_leaf_or_nonleaf_block(Block *b);
+ bool is_leaf_block();
+ bool check_structured_block_conditions();
+ bool is_structured_block();
private:
bool depth_pro
utube.com/watch?v=pRtTIW9-Nr0
I have started reading the specification of latest 5.0 standard.
Please suggest if this could be an interesting idea for upcoming GSoC ?
Thanks,
Sameeran Joshi
Hi, we had reported 1 issue
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87118)
Using the extended csmith for gcc c language extensions.
We are currently working on adding more extensions to it and fuzzing in
background.
Thanks,
Sameeran joshi
On Fri 7 Dec, 2018, 9:07 PM Jeff Law, wrote
mean to build gcc with -pg option, how does that help in
source code coverage?
Thanks,
Sameeran Joshi
Thank you people for your help and investing time.
I have successfully reduces file and filed bug.
Thanks,
Sameeran Joshi
On 8/27/18, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 8/27/18 1:20 PM, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> On 8/27/18, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> On 8/27/18 12:13 PM, sameeran joshi w
On 8/27/18, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 8/27/18 12:13 PM, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> On 8/27/18, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> Well what does:
>>>
>>> linux% gcc -I/home/swamimauli/upload/csmith/runtime/ -Wall bug.c
>>
>> running above command on termin
On 8/27/18, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 8/27/18 11:42 AM, sameeran joshi wrote:
>> It's still giving output as 1,I included the -squiggle option still,it
>> dosen't work for me? any Ideas?
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> CC="-I/home/swamimauli/upload/c
C} ${OPTS} ${TEST} 2>&1 | grep 'internal compiler error:in
expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7862'
if ! test $? = 0; then
exit 1
fi
exit 0
Thanks.
Sameeran Joshi
On 8/27/18, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 8/27/18 10:35 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
>> Here is the file. I am g
"0" being echoed to the terminal.
See "creduce --help" for more information.
Thanks,
Sameeran Joshi
Hi all,I have been figuring out to work on some project,so while searching
I found fuzzer implementation project quite interesting,so please can I get
some information and links about the extension of fuzzer project for gcc .
Can anyone help me please.
16 matches
Mail list logo
