Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Results for 4.4.0 20081106 (experimental) [trunk revision 141636] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]

Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Martin Jambor wrote: >From the logs I see that the testsuite probably uses a cross-compiled gcc? How do you configure gcc to get such a beats? See . (Don't ever change anything in the hardlinked /

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Results for 4.4.0 20081106 (experimental) [trunk revision 141636] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]

On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Martin Jambor wrote: > >From the logs I see that the testsuite probably uses a cross-compiled > gcc? How do you configure gcc to get such a beats? See . (Don't ever change anything in the hardlinked /combined tree, though and don't tr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Results for 4.4.0 20081106 (experimental) [trunk revision 141636] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]

> 2008-11-07 Martin Jambor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Do not check > for INDIRECT_REFs. > (forward_propagate_addr_into_variable_array_index): Check that the > offset is not computed from a MULT_EXPR, use is_gimple_assig

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Results for 4.4.0 20081106 (experimental) [trunk revision 141636] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]

Hi, On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 01:05:43PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Note that you'll have to build (and install, of course) a > cross-binutils first, then build a cross-gcc (libgcc will fail to > build), then cross-build and install newlib, then build cross-gcc > again (it will work this time) an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Results for 4.4.0 20081106 (experimental) [trunk revision 141636] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]

> My knowledge of backend and RTL in general is very limited and I have > no clue what m32c-elf architecture is and don't seem to have access to > any such system. m32c-elf is one of the many embedded (i.e. cross-compiled) targets which has a simulator. You don't need to have access to physical

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Results for 4.4.0 20081106 (experimental) [trunk revision 141636] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]

Hi, On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:01:13PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > This new failure seems to have been caused by r141613: > > +2008-11-05 Martin Jambor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > + > + PR middle-end/37861 > + * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Don't turn > + p

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Results for 4.4.0 20081106 (experimental) [trunk revision 141636] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]

This new failure seems to have been caused by r141613: +2008-11-05 Martin Jambor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + PR middle-end/37861 + * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Don't turn + pointer arithmetics into array_ref if the array is accessed + through an ind