James E Wilson
Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
* We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On this
DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC take
advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
GCC has little support for non-power-of-2 sized
James == James E Wilson James writes:
James Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
* We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On
this DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC
take advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
James GCC has
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 06:00, Paul Koning wrote:
I wonder if the work-in-progress PDP10 port
(http://pdp10.nocrew.org/gcc/) might help with this.
Interesting, but a hobbyist port for a 36-bit machine that was
end-of-lifed about 2 decades ago has little chance of success, unless
there are some
James == James E Wilson James writes:
James On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 06:00, Paul Koning wrote:
I wonder if the work-in-progress PDP10 port
(http://pdp10.nocrew.org/gcc/) might help with this.
James Interesting, but a hobbyist port for a 36-bit machine that was
James end-of-lifed about 2
Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
* We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On this
DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC take
advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
GCC has little support for non-power-of-2 sized accumulators.
Hello every one,
Me and Brian Richter are in the early development stage of the TI
C54x DSP port of GCC. We have some technical/project management questions. I'll
keep it short, so here it is:
* How do we officially become maintainers of this port ? We are presently in the
process of filling
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:10:57PM -0400, Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
Me and Brian Richter are in the early development stage of the TI
C54x DSP port of GCC. We have some technical/project management questions.
I'll
keep it short, so here it is:
* How do we officially become
