This question is not appropriate for the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list.
It would be appropriate on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am wondering if i have used -O, -O2 or -O3, do i still benifit from
flags such as -march -fmpmath -ffast-math -mmx -sse
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The codec is at http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/openavs/.
Currently, it requires a 3Ghz or better CPU to get a resonable
framerate. I would like the codec to be useful even on 586
( 1Ghz or
so ). Any ideas?
Recode slower parts in
Hi,
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 19:57, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The codec is at http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/openavs/.
Currently, it requires a 3Ghz or better CPU to get a resonable
framerate. I would like the codec to be useful even on
On 05 July 2006 19:11, Rene Rebe wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 19:57, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The codec is at http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/openavs/.
Currently, it requires a 3Ghz or better CPU to get a resonable
framerate. I
Hi,
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 20:26, Dave Korn wrote:
I believe Lionel's real problem is likely to be that he was hoping that
turning on the -mmx -sse -sse2 -3dnow options would auto-vectorise his code
for him.
Lionel, (IIUIC) those options just /enable/ the use of the various SIMD
Hello GCC list:
I am wondering if i have used -O, -O2 or -O3, do i still benifit from
flags such as -march -fmpmath -ffast-math -mmx -sse -sse2 -3dnow?
I am optimizing a video codec and i see barely any performance
difference whether i use just -O2 or -ffast-math -march=athlon-xp
-mmmx -msse
