H.J. Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27.04.2008 21:31:14:
Is this related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg01951.html
H.J.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:47 AM, FX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cygwin native built gfortran 4.4 was already broken, even when it
was
making it
I want to flag the failure in bootstrapping gfortran-4.4.0-20080425 [1],
observed on Cygwin.
---
[...]
# Now that we have built all the objects, we need to copy
# them back to the GCC directory. Too many things (other
# in-tree libraries, and DejaGNU) know about
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure:
error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
Well, as it says so well, we need to see your config.log if we want
to have any idea at all what's happening. That should be the file in
FX wrote:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error:
C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
Well, as it says so well, we need to see your config.log if we want to
have any idea at all what's happening. That should be the file in
Cygwin native built gfortran 4.4 was already broken, even when it
was making it through bootstrap and testsuite. All comments I've
received told me I was wasting my time with it.
Where is that bug reported? cygwin is secondary target, I think it
should really be unbroken, with the help of
Is this related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg01951.html
H.J.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:47 AM, FX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cygwin native built gfortran 4.4 was already broken, even when it was
making it through bootstrap and testsuite. All comments I've received told
me
FX ha scritto:
Cygwin native built gfortran 4.4 was already broken, even when it was
making it through bootstrap and testsuite. All comments I've received
told me I was wasting my time with it.
Where is that bug reported? cygwin is secondary target, I think it
should really be unbroken,
H.J. Lu wrote:
Is this related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg01951.html
H.J.y t
Seems unlikely. I don't see that Fortran was involved in the failure,
although both of us included it in configure. If it makes a difference,
I'll try to bootstrap C alone tomorrow, from the
