I am also planning to incorporate many Ada improvements (such as
improved support for Ada 2005) and fixes that
I was holding while the 4.2 branch was not created, I assume this is
not an issue (and very localized to the gcc/ada/ directory of course).
Arno
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:
As Gerald noticed, there are now fewer than 100 serious regressions open
against mainline, which means that we've met the criteria for creating
the 4.2 release branch. (We still have 17 P1s, so we've certainly got
some work left to do before creating
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
The configury bit was approved by DJ for stage1, but do you see any reason
to hold back? Or is this posting sufficient warning that people may need
to upgrade? (I.e. people should start upgrading their libraries now.)
I don't see any reason to hold back.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMA for C++ is another difficult case. This is unambiguously useful,
though duplicative of what we're trying to build with LTO.
Although there are some things you can do with LTO that you can also
do with IMA, there are many things that you can do with
As Gerald noticed, there are now fewer than 100 serious regressions open
against mainline, which means that we've met the criteria for creating
the 4.2 release branch. (We still have 17 P1s, so we've certainly got
some work left to do before creating a 4.2 release, and I hope people
will
