...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 6:24 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'; Jeff Law; r...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Merging Cilk Plus into GCC Trunk
On 08/30/12 15:39, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello Everyone,
The Cilk-Plus branch is feature-complete. Programs using Cilk Plus
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
If this is OK with everyone, I will start sending patches to
gcc-patches mailing list soon.
Regarding the patch ordering you list, note that earlier patches may not
be reviewable without later ones (specifically, code changes can only be
: Merging Cilk Plus into GCC Trunk
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
If this is OK with everyone, I will start sending patches to
gcc-patches mailing list soon.
Regarding the patch ordering you list, note that earlier patches may not be
reviewable without later ones (specifically
On 09/05/2012 12:59 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Regarding the patch ordering you list, note that earlier patches may not
be reviewable without later ones (specifically, code changes can only be
reviewed given documentation and testcases - in some cases documentation
might be external, but it does
On 09/05/12 12:09, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
I can't speak for the rest of the community, but I think items 1-12 are useful
for
GCC (elemental functions, SIMD annotations, and array notations for C/C++),
regardless of any language extensions. Perhaps you could provide examples on
these as a
On 08/30/12 15:39, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello Everyone,
The Cilk-Plus branch is feature-complete. Programs using Cilk Plus
constructs get great performance on vector and multicore hardware. Programs
that don't use the new language features (enabled by a -fcilkplus flag) see no
Hello Everyone,
The Cilk-Plus branch is feature-complete. Programs using Cilk Plus
constructs get great performance on vector and multicore hardware. Programs
that don't use the new language features (enabled by a -fcilkplus flag) see no
change. For details please see
