> On Aug 4, 2021, at 3:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, 08:26 John Ericson wrote:
>
>> Problem:
>>
>> It's somewhat annoying to have to tell GCC --with-as=... --with-ld=...
>> just to prefix those commands the same way GCC is prefixed.
>>
>
> Doesn't GCC automa
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 08:41, John Ericson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021, at 3:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't GCC automatically look for those commands in the --prefix directory
> > that you configure GCC with? Or is that only for native compilers?
> >
>
> It will search only
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021, at 3:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>
> Doesn't GCC automatically look for those commands in the --prefix directory
> that you configure GCC with? Or is that only for native compilers?
>
It will search only if --with-*=... was not passed, and it will never prefix
the
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, 08:26 John Ericson wrote:
> Problem:
>
> It's somewhat annoying to have to tell GCC --with-as=... --with-ld=...
> just to prefix those commands the same way GCC is prefixed.
>
Doesn't GCC automatically look for those commands in the --prefix directory
that you configure GCC wi
Problem:
It's somewhat annoying to have to tell GCC --with-as=... --with-ld=... just to
prefix those commands the same way GCC is prefixed.
In particular, when doing host-only build (skipping all target libraries), one
otherwise doesn't need the target-specific binutils to be yet built, but
--
