On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 06:12:37PM +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> FWIW, at AdaCore we're using e500v2-wrs-vxworks for our VxWorks
> toolchain for SPE.
config.sub translates that to powerpc-wrs-vxworksspe so that works.
Segher
FWIW, at AdaCore we're using e500v2-wrs-vxworks for our VxWorks
toolchain for SPE.
Arno
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 10:55:53AM -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >powerpc-*-rtemsspe* would be OK.
> >
> >powerpc-*-eabisimspe* is pretty ugly though.
>
>
> After I sent this, I saw in another response that powerpcspe*-*-*
> was proposed. Is that clearer?
Yes, it does not have part of the archit
On 5/1/2017 10:47 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 5/1/2017 5:48 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
We also still have to agree on the target triples for the new port.
If you have any thoughts on this, I'd love to hear them.
It seems fairly obvious that the
On 5/1/2017 5:48 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
We also still have to agree on the target triples for the new port.
If you have any thoughts on this, I'd love to hear them.
It seems fairly obvious that the powerpc-*-eabispe* and
powerpc*-*-linux*spe*
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:30:59AM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> > My current patches have powerpc*-*-*spe* for the powerpcspe port.
> > Maybe it should also allow powerpcspe-*-*? If people are willing
> > to change the target triple they use.
>
>
On Mon, 1 May 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> My current patches have powerpc*-*-*spe* for the powerpcspe port.
> Maybe it should also allow powerpcspe-*-*? If people are willing
> to change the target triple they use.
In that case, either config.sub or config.gcc could handle the mapping.
>
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 10:48:05AM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> > We also still have to agree on the target triples for the new port.
> > If you have any thoughts on this, I'd love to hear them.
>
> It seems fairly obvious that the powerpc-*-eabi
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> We also still have to agree on the target triples for the new port.
> If you have any thoughts on this, I'd love to hear them.
It seems fairly obvious that the powerpc-*-eabispe* and
powerpc*-*-linux*spe* triples should continue to work while bein
On 04/28/2017 05:15 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:18:55AM +0100, Andrew Jenner wrote:
On 13/03/2017 18:01, Andrew Jenner wrote:
I volunteer to be the point of contact for the SPE port.
Over here at CodeSourcery/Mentor Embedded, we have a strong interest i
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:18:55AM +0100, Andrew Jenner wrote:
> On 13/03/2017 18:01, Andrew Jenner wrote:
> >I volunteer to be the point of contact for the SPE port.
> >
> >Over here at CodeSourcery/Mentor Embedded, we have a strong interest in
> >SPE *not* being deprecated (we activel
On 13/03/2017 18:01, Andrew Jenner wrote:
I volunteer to be the point of contact for the SPE port.
Over here at CodeSourcery/Mentor Embedded, we have a strong interest in
SPE *not* being deprecated (we actively ship toolchain products with SPE
multilibs, and have customers for which these are im
12 matches
Mail list logo
