Re: [wwwdocs] Re: gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

2014-08-19 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:57 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 16:56 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: How about the attached .html as a replacement

Re: [wwwdocs] Re: gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

2014-08-19 Thread Oleg Endo
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 07:02 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:57 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 16:56 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Fri, 15 Aug 2014,

Re: [wwwdocs] Re: gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

2014-08-18 Thread Oleg Endo
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 16:56 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: How about the attached .html as a replacement for the current one? I removed the requirement of setting up a combined tree, as I believe it makes things much more easy. At least it's been

Re: [wwwdocs] Re: gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

2014-08-18 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 16:56 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: How about the attached .html as a replacement for the current one? I removed the requirement of setting up a combined tree, as I believe it makes

Re: [wwwdocs] Re: gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

2014-08-17 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: How about the attached .html as a replacement for the current one? I removed the requirement of setting up a combined tree, as I believe it makes things much more easy. At least it's been working for me that way. Is this helpful / OK to commit?

Re: [wwwdocs] Re: gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

2014-08-15 Thread Oleg Endo
On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 22:58 +0200, Oleg Endo wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 08:19 +0200, Oleg Endo wrote: On Aug 4, 2014, at 6:00 AM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: The page https://gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html is

Re: gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

2014-08-04 Thread Oleg Endo
On Aug 4, 2014, at 6:00 AM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: The page https://gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html is unfortunately out of date (e.g. binutils+sim now lives in the same git repo) but it gives you the idea. Sooo, any

gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

2014-08-03 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: The page https://gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html is unfortunately out of date (e.g. binutils+sim now lives in the same git repo) but it gives you the idea. Sooo, any volunteer to update this page? Doesn't have to be perfect, even incremental

Re: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf

2014-07-23 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, David Wohlferd wrote: I have been looking at asm_fprintf in final.c, and I think there's a design flaw. But since the change affects ARM and since I have no access to an ARM system, I need a second opinion. There's this thing called cross-compilation, which happens for

Re: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf

2014-07-23 Thread David Wohlferd
Not that the following would constitute the actual testing usually required for a patch, but: /path/to/toplevel/configure --target=arm-eabi make all-gcc # Yay, the compiler-proper for a bare iron ARM compiler. ./gcc/xgcc -B./gcc -S test.c Woot, compiled your first ARM program. :) Just

Re: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf

2014-07-22 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi David, On 22/07/14 02:46, David Wohlferd wrote: I have been looking at asm_fprintf in final.c, and I think there's a design flaw. But since the change affects ARM and since I have no access to an ARM system, I need a second opinion. asm_fprintf allows platforms to add support for new

Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf

2014-07-21 Thread David Wohlferd
I have been looking at asm_fprintf in final.c, and I think there's a design flaw. But since the change affects ARM and since I have no access to an ARM system, I need a second opinion. asm_fprintf allows platforms to add support for new format specifiers by using the ASM_FPRINTF_EXTENSIONS