Thanks for the suggestions.
If you only want to optimize some libraries but not others, GCC doesn't
effectively support different multilibs having different sets of libraries
either.
My proposal http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-01/msg00063.html
would have the effect of making it much easier to
Hi,
Is it possible to update the multilib combinations supported by GCC after it
has been built? (I would like to build some libraries optimised for
different CPUs variants, that aren't built by default).
I tried doing this via a specs file, but something like the following fails:
%rename
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 18:30 +0100, Jon Beniston wrote:
Is it possible to update the multilib combinations supported by GCC after it
has been built?
I don't know for sure, but I would guess and imagine that it is not
possible. The intuition is that multilib-ness is really a matter of
choosing
Jon Beniston j...@beniston.com writes:
Is it possible to update the multilib combinations supported by GCC after it
has been built?
I believe that all the multilib information can be read from the specs
file, so, technically, yes.
%rename multilib_matches old_multilib_matches
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Jon Beniston wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to update the multilib combinations supported by GCC after it
has been built? (I would like to build some libraries optimised for
different CPUs variants, that aren't built by default).
I tried doing this via a specs file, but
