> The report in
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-12/msg00459.html
>
> claims to be from the 4_2_branch at
>
> Mon Dec 11 08:40:27 UTC 2006 (revision 119731)
>
> That's wrong; it's actually from
>
> Sun Dec 10 08:39:43 UTC 2006 (revision 119704)
>
> but the run took more than 24 hours
Hi all,
The report in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-12/msg00459.html
claims to be from the 4_2_branch at
Mon Dec 11 08:40:27 UTC 2006 (revision 119731)
That's wrong; it's actually from
Sun Dec 10 08:39:43 UTC 2006 (revision 119704)
but the run took more than 24 hours and the cro