Re: bogon in a gcc-testresults post (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)

2006-12-11 Thread Eric Botcazou
> The report in > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-12/msg00459.html > > claims to be from the 4_2_branch at > > Mon Dec 11 08:40:27 UTC 2006 (revision 119731) > > That's wrong; it's actually from > > Sun Dec 10 08:39:43 UTC 2006 (revision 119704) > > but the run took more than 24 hours

bogon in a gcc-testresults post (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)

2006-12-11 Thread Joe Buck
Hi all, The report in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-12/msg00459.html claims to be from the 4_2_branch at Mon Dec 11 08:40:27 UTC 2006 (revision 119731) That's wrong; it's actually from Sun Dec 10 08:39:43 UTC 2006 (revision 119704) but the run took more than 24 hours and the cro