On 2008-08-04 13:05:09 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I don't think so, http://gmp.darwinports.com/ shows that it is still a
> problem with 4.2.2.
This is a commercial and out-of-date web site. You should look at
MacPorts instead:
http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/devel/gmp/Portfil
Jay wrote:
Because at some point, no released version worked on intel macs.
Long since passed and can be removed?
I don't think so, http://gmp.darwinports.com/ shows that it is still a
problem with 4.2.2. Besides, GMP's authors say that it is often a
stress test for compilers, so using mor
normally",
this wouldn't occur. Or, is cpu=none not so abnormal? Just that I hadn't seen
it?
(Everything new and normal is initially new and abnormal, of course.)
- Jay
> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:53:43 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC:
Jay wrote:
Andrew, Can you explain more why?
Because at some point, no released version worked on intel macs.
And then gmp/configure runs flex.
And then sometimes?always flex tries to run getenv("M4") || "m4".
Yes, Flex uses m4.
gmp/configure probably should not be setting M4
Yes, I thi
t is looking for what file is
the output.
gmp/configure probably should not be setting M4, at least not when it runs flex.
But gcc using processor=none doesn't help.
I'll follow up with gmp folks.
Thanks,
- Jay
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:53:35 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, I didn't realize any C or C++ code could be configured for other than a
> specific processor but I guess that makes sense -- it is Makefile, config.h,
> and such that are being modified, not the .o files, and they might be the
>
x27;t seen such configure processor=none use.).
- Jay
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:39:42 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: configuring in-tree gmp/mpfr with "none"?
> CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jay
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When gcc configures the in-tree gmp/mpfr, why
> does it use --host=none-${host_vendor}-${host_os}
> --target=none-${host_vendor}-${host_os}
>
> instead of --host=${host_alias} --target=${target_alias}
>
> This "breaks" config.ca
When gcc configures the in-tree gmp/mpfr, why
does it use --host=none-${host_vendor}-${host_os}
--target=none-${host_vendor}-${host_os}
instead of --host=${host_alias} --target=${target_alias}
This "breaks" config.cache if used across directories, because the platforms
change.
I'm trying li
