Re: make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-19 Thread Ben Elliston
Hi Paolo > It supports all the bells and whistles like bubblestraps and > restageN, which help during development. make restrap (taking a > non-bootstrap build and using it as stage1) is not supported. make > restageN is called make all-stageN, and there is also make > all-stageN-gcc to rebuild gc

Re: make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-16 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What about bubblestrap? >> >> (See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438) >> >> > A "make" from a toplevel is equivalent to the old "make bubblestrap" > or "make -C bubblestrap". In practice "make" just does the right > thing, compiling

Re: make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-16 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Christian Joensson wrote: What about bubblestrap? (See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438) A "make" from a toplevel is equivalent to the old "make bubblestrap" or "make -C bubblestrap". In practice "make" just does the right thing, compiling all that is needed to not h

Re: make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-16 Thread Christian Joensson
What about bubblestrap? (See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438) -- Cheers, /ChJ

Re: make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-16 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Will make quickstrap do the same as "make all"? No, there's no "make quickstrap" at all! Citing from the "Top-Level Bootstrap" wiki page: Toplevel bootstrap is able to bootstrap a compiler with separate reconfigurations and rebuilds of libiberty/libcpp/gcc in all the three stages. It is

Re: make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-15 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 19:01 +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In previous versions of GCC before yesterday, "make all" used to do a > > normal build > > but now I am getting a full bootstrap which is not what I wanted as I > > was just testing > > objecti

Re: make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-15 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In previous versions of GCC before yesterday, "make all" used to do a > normal build > but now I am getting a full bootstrap which is not what I wanted as I > was just testing > objective-C and libobjc changes and nothing else. > > Is this is deliberate

Re: make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-15 Thread Paolo Carlini
Andrew Pinski wrote: > Is this is deliberate change or just a mistake? I'm pretty sure is deliberate and --disable-bootstrap is the config you need. Paolo.

make all vs make bootstrap

2005-12-15 Thread Andrew Pinski
In previous versions of GCC before yesterday, "make all" used to do a normal build but now I am getting a full bootstrap which is not what I wanted as I was just testing objective-C and libobjc changes and nothing else. Is this is deliberate change or just a mistake? Thanks, Andrew Pinski