Re: temporarily giving up using Git for GCC MELT

2011-02-27 Thread Miles Bader
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Miles Bader writes: >> Do you use the http: or git: protocol for cloning?  The official gcc git >> repo only supports the "old" git http: protocol, which is almost useless >> on slow/high-latency networks... > > gcc.gnu.org does talk git

Re: temporarily giving up using Git for GCC MELT

2011-02-27 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Miles Bader writes: > [...] > Do you use the http: or git: protocol for cloning? The official gcc git > repo only supports the "old" git http: protocol, which is almost useless > on slow/high-latency networks... gcc.gnu.org does talk git:// too. By "new http", you are probably referring to the

Re: temporarily giving up using Git for GCC MELT

2011-02-26 Thread Miles Bader
Basile Starynkevitch writes: > PS. By the way, git clone-ing the GCC git repository takes a lot of time > from Europe. Perhaps having a daily tar ball of the result of that command > available by ftp would be very nice Do you use the http: or git: protocol for cloning? The official gcc git r

temporarily giving up using Git for GCC MELT

2011-02-25 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello All, Even with the help of very nice people and of the gcc@ list, I am unable to use git for GCC MELT with ease. I tried this entire week without success My only issue is merging the trunk into GCC MELT but since this is something I am doing several times a week, it makes me temporaril