Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
It is quite standard since a long time, and I don't understand why it should
be avoided (as some old Changelog suggest).
Which old ChangeLog? What exactly does it say? We can't help you if we
don't know what you are talking about.
There used to be setjmp calls i
Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems to me that setjmp & longjmp are (almost) never used inside the
> compiler but I don't understand why it is so.
>
> It is quite standard since a long time, and I don't understand why it should
> be avoided (as some old Changelog suggest).
Hello All
It seems to me that setjmp & longjmp are (almost) never used inside the
compiler but I don't understand why it is so.
It is quite standard since a long time, and I don't understand why it should
be avoided (as some old Changelog suggest).
gcc/doc/trouble.texi gives some hints about set
