Re: [gccsdk] -lOSLlib and -static no go

2013-10-07 Thread Alan Buckley
Ron wrote on Sent: Monday, Oct 07, 2013 1:32 AM: I now think that putting a lib such as libOSLib.a in SharedLibs is only appropriate if nonstatic output is required. A better place for added libraries seems to be in !GCC.arm-unknown-riscos.lib and then there is no need for -LOSLib: and setvars

Re: [gccsdk] -lOSLlib and -static no go

2013-10-07 Thread Ron
In message dub120-ds14efbda43cca2a66edd32bf0...@phx.gbl Alan Buckley alan_...@hotmail.com wrote: Ron wrote on Sent: Monday, Oct 07, 2013 1:32 AM: I now think that putting a lib such as libOSLib.a in SharedLibs is only appropriate if nonstatic output is required. A better place

Re: [gccsdk] -lOSLlib and -static no go

2013-10-07 Thread John Tytgat
In message c01b3c9653.b...@ron1954.woosh.co.nz Ron b...@woosh.co.nz wrote: I think my installation of oslib is OK, I used the softfloat GCC version from the sourceforge site. Sourceforge site ? Not riscos.info ? John. -- John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home john.tyt...@aaug.net

Re: [gccsdk] Porting asasm

2013-10-07 Thread John Tytgat
In message op.w4ggmfkcl0n5eg@amoe.local Ben Avison bavi...@riscosopen.org wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:55:50 +0100, John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote: ! 0, :STR::CC_ENCODING:AL should output E000, but outputs 000E instead. Interesting, that's not what I've

Re: [gccsdk] -lOSLlib and -static no go

2013-10-07 Thread John Tytgat
In message 9cbb089753...@hobbes.bass-software.com John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote: In message c01b3c9653.b...@ron1954.woosh.co.nz Ron b...@woosh.co.nz wrote: I think my installation of oslib is OK, I used the softfloat GCC version from the sourceforge site.