[Bug bootstrap/17383] [4.0 Regression] Building in src dir fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 04:58 --- *** Bug 21187 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17383

[Bug target/21187] Gcc 4.0.0 Compile error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 04:58 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17383 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/17383] [4.0 Regression] Building in src dir fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 04:57 --- *** Bug 21186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/21186] Gcc 4.0.0 Compile error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 04:57 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17383 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/21130] 38822 lines of Fortran 90 takes more than 10 minutes to compile on a dual 3GHz P4 Linux box with lots of RAM

--- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2005-04-24 04:05 --- ifort does it in about 5 seconds. It issues several warnings about alignments, but otherwise completes quickly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130

[Bug fortran/20879] argument to ICHAR must have length one

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 04:04 --- Here's a partial fix to the problem. Unfortunately, it doesn't detect the problem in Joost's program, which requires a runtime check. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02507.html -- http://gc

[Bug target/21187] New: Gcc 4.0.0 Compile error

./configure works fine. make gives this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gcc-4.0.0> make Configuring in fastjar configure: loading cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD-compatible install... (cached) /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... (cached) ga

[Bug target/21186] New: Gcc 4.0.0 Compile error

./configure works fine. make gives this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gcc-4.0.0> make Configuring in fastjar configure: loading cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD-compatible install... (cached) /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... (cached) ga

[Bug libstdc++/21183] -Wall control may end non-void fn warning in libc++ routine

--- Additional Comments From mj1 at cog dot brown dot edu 2005-04-24 00:49 --- Subject: Re: -Wall control may end non-void fn warning in libc++ routine Thanks for the quick reply! Yes, I did use -fno-exceptions If I remove that, the warning goes away. Thanks very much for your help

[Bug libfortran/21185] libgfortran unusable for cross-testing for newlib targets

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 00:01 --- All I can say is that libgfortran depends on some UNIX^wPOSIX functions being there. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21185

[Bug libfortran/21185] New: libgfortran unusable for cross-testing for newlib targets

fortran.log shows that functions not present in newlib are referenced: Executing on host: /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/gcc/testsuite/../gfortran -B/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/gcc/testsuite/../ /home/hp/c\ ombined/combined/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/PR19754_2.f90 -O0 -pedantic-errors -isystem /ho

[Bug fortran/21184] New: fortran built and tested despite target-libgfortran disabled

Try to build mmix-knuth-mmixware as per simtest-howto.html. Observe the fortran front-end being built despite libgfortran disabled at toplevel (libgfortran has no support for systems without stdint.h and not being LPI32 so it doesn't build). When testing, observe the test-suite being run and not b

[Bug bootstrap/17383] [4.0 Regression] Building in src dir fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 23:43 --- *** Bug 21176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/21176] Cannot make on Solaris 9 (Intel)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 23:43 --- Then this is a dup of bug 17383. Build in a different directory as the source as the instructions recommend: . *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17383 *** -

[Bug bootstrap/21176] Cannot make on Solaris 9 (Intel)

--- Additional Comments From shanwill44 at yahoo dot com 2005-04-23 23:35 --- Just ./configure or ./configure --with-gnu-ld due to 'file format not recognized' message appeared in the previous versions. Thanks in advance. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21176

[Bug middle-end/19699] [4.0/4.1 Regression] warning about not returning from end of a non-void function because of dead code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 23:14 --- *** Bug 21183 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/21183] -Wall control may end non-void fn warning in libc++ routine

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 23:14 --- I am assuming you used -fno-exceptions, then this is a dup of bug 19699. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19699 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/21183] New: -Wall control may end non-void fn warning in libc++ routine

When compiling a C++ program with -Wall, I get the following compiler warning /usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0/bits/stl_uninitialized.h:113: warning: control may reach end of non-void function '_ForwardIterator std::__uninitialized_copy_aux(_InputIter

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-04-23 23:01 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel Yeah, well, ehm... The original bug resurfaces with my patch. This happens because is_gimple_reg_rhs only looks at the outerm

[Bug rtl-optimization/21182] gcc can use registers but uses stack instead

--- Additional Comments From vda at port dot imtp dot ilyichevsk dot odessa dot ua 2005-04-23 22:54 --- These are -O2 and -O3 code comparison. -O3 code have all modified variables in registers and thus is smaller and most likely faster. serpent_encrypt: pushl %ebp movl

[Bug rtl-optimization/21182] gcc can use registers but uses stack instead

--- Additional Comments From vda at port dot imtp dot ilyichevsk dot odessa dot ua 2005-04-23 22:49 --- Aha! I found out that gcc will use registers with -O3, but not with -O2. # gcc -O3 serpent.c -S -o serpent-O3.s # gcc -O2 serpent.c -S -o serpent-O2.s # ls -l -rw-r--r-- 1 root root

[Bug rtl-optimization/21182] gcc can use registers but uses stack instead

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 22:39 --- Hmm, on the mainline, we get for wc -l: 1613 t.s 1459 t1.s t1 is the normal #if 0. Note I used "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer". -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/21182] gcc can use registers but uses stack instead

--- Additional Comments From vda at port dot imtp dot ilyichevsk dot odessa dot ua 2005-04-23 22:32 --- Created an attachment (id=8719) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8719&action=view) testcase. change #if 0 into #if 1 and compare resulting asm -- http://gcc.gnu

[Bug rtl-optimization/21182] New: gcc can use registers but uses stack instead

in this long but relatively simple function gcc can store all frequently used local variables in registers, but it fails to do so. gcc can be forced to do this optimization by asm("reg") modifiers. Resulting code is ~1k smaller. # gcc -v Reading specs from /.share/usr/app/gcc-3.4.3/bin/../lib/gcc

[Bug fortran/21177] wrong code with NULL()

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 22:07 --- In interface.c, we use compare_parameter to match an actual argument to one of the formal arguments. The type is used to determine which member of the interface (tt_r or tt_i) we will call. Unfortunately,

[Bug middle-end/21082] &a[b] - &a[c] is not folded to b - c

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21082

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

-- Bug 19987 depends on bug 21082, which changed state. Bug 21082 Summary: &a[b] - &a[c] is not folded to b - c http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21082 What|Old Value |New Value -

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

-- Bug 19807 depends on bug 21082, which changed state. Bug 21082 Summary: &a[b] - &a[c] is not folded to b - c http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21082 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug middle-end/19986] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations (compared to RTL)

-- Bug 19986 depends on bug 21082, which changed state. Bug 21082 Summary: &a[b] - &a[c] is not folded to b - c http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21082 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug middle-end/21082] &a[b] - &a[c] is not folded to b - c

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 21:36 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/21082] &a[b] - &a[c] is not folded to b - c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 21:34 --- Subject: Bug 21082 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-23 21:34:42 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c gcc/t

[Bug middle-end/21082] &a[b] - &a[c] is not folded to b - c

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 21:05 --- Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02499.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/19403] [4.0/4.1 Regression] name lookup is broken with friends

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 20:38 --- *** Bug 21181 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/21181] namespace lookup error message misleading

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 20:38 --- This is a dup of bug 19403. The problem is that GCC before 4.0.0, the friend was saying the wrong friend was a friend of B. But in 4.0.0 we get that right but a decided that the class was declared in th

[Bug c++/21181] New: namespace lookup error message misleading

Consider the following C++ code: class A; namespace X { class B { friend class A; }; } using namespace X; class A {}; A a; In the last line the compiler complains that A is undefined. After reading the release notes I understamd what happens (although I'm surprised. E.g. Comeau accepts the code

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 19:37 --- Created an attachment (id=8718) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8718&action=view) patch Jakub, your patch is wrong. Try this one. -- What|Removed |A

[Bug rtl-optimization/21102] ICE: in immed_double_const, on SSE2 intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 19:18 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/21102] ICE: in immed_double_const, on SSE2 intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 19:17 --- Subject: Bug 21102 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-23 19:16:57 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog simplify-rtx.c Log messag

[Bug rtl-optimization/21102] ICE: in immed_double_const, on SSE2 intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 19:01 --- Subject: Bug 21102 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-23 19:01:04 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug rtl-optimization/21102] ICE: in immed_double_const, on SSE2 intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 18:57 --- Technically this is generic, though one does have to have vector support in the target for things to make it this far to see. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/21102] ICE: in immed_double_const, on SSE2 intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 18:55 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/13761] [tree-ssa] component refs to the same struct should not alias

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 18:41 --- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] component refs to the same struct should not alias On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 16:52 +, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc d

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/13761] [tree-ssa] component refs to the same struct should not alias

On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 16:52 +, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 > 16:52 --- > Will the second part of the struct alias merge fix Dann's original > test case? ("http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Structure Aliasing Part

[Bug libfortran/21127] reshape of complex broken

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 18:26 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Or, alternatively, we could call reshape_generic. Which of course would be > evil > from a performance standpoitn :-) Actually, that's what we are doing for a lot of intrinsics:

[Bug libfortran/21108] [4.0 only] reshape with order causes random results

(any (a /= c)) call abort end $ gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.0/configure --prefix=/home/ig25 --enable-languages=c,f95 --enable-checking Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.1 20050423 (prerelease) -- What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/21180] [4.1 Regression] checking on fold no longer happens in some cases

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.1 Regression] checking on|[4.1 Regression] checking on |fold is no longer happen in |fold no longer happens in

[Bug target/21101] ICE: could not find a spill register on MMX intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:23 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot

[Bug target/21100] [4.0 Regression] ICE: unrecognizable insn for -march=pentium-mmx

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:21 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/21100] [4.0 Regression] ICE: unrecognizable insn for -march=pentium-mmx

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:21 --- Subject: Bug 21100 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-23 17:20:59 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From azarah at gentoo dot org 2005-04-23 17:19 --- Patch from comment #7 seems to work here (doing make check now to verify). I assume the change Jakub asked about is not needed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21173

[Bug target/21007] [4.1 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-2.c execution fails on hppa64-hpux and cris-elf

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:17 --- Most likely fixed by: +2005-04-22 Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * tree-cfg.c (tree_duplicate_bb): Call create_new_def_for + for newly created PHI nodes. + Call create_new_def_for

[Bug target/21099] ICE on mmx intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:16 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/21099] ICE on mmx intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:14 --- Subject: Bug 21099 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-23 17:14:31 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-eh.c gcc/conf

[Bug target/21099] ICE on mmx intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:13 --- Subject: Bug 21099 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-23 17:13:12 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/21007] [4.1 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-2.c execution fails on hppa64-hpux and cris-elf

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:10 --- Still failed with LAST_UPDATED "Fri Apr 22 23:44:55 UTC 2005". Confirmed to pass with "Sat Apr 23 12:51:56 UTC 2005". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21007

[Bug middle-end/21180] [4.1 Regression] checking on fold is no longer happen in some cases

-- What|Removed |Added CC||kazu at cs dot umass dot edu Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/21180] New: [4.1 Regression] checking on fold is no longer happen in some cases

the changes to use "fold_buildN" instead of "fold (buildN", makes us no do fold checking in those case. This PR records that face. -- Summary: [4.1 Regression] checking on fold is no longer happen in some cases Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0

[Bug tree-optimization/19940] Missed jump threading opportunity due to |.

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:03 --- This is not fixed by Jeff's latest threader patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19940

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:58 --- 18832 has no jump threading issues left, says Jeff. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsO

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:58 --- (In reply to comment #5) > PS Andrew, for someone who claims not to know fortran, you seem to get into > some of its murkier corners! We'll have you writing fortran code yet... I get help from people who

[Bug tree-optimization/18046] Missed jump threading optimization

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:57 --- I'm going to implement lowering of some SWITCH_EXPRs at the tree level. At least the ones that we do not produce a decision tree for now in stmt.c... -- What|Removed |

[Bug c++/20995] [3.4 regression] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1391

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-04-23 16:57 --- Don't know what happened there; this should be component "c++"! -- What|Removed |Added C

[Bug target/21099] ICE on mmx intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:56 --- Confirmed. Curiously, the test case doesn't fail compiled as C, only C++. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug driver/20995] [3.4 regression] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1391

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-04-23 16:56 --- Doh, fold_if_not_in_template is not on the gcc 3.4 branch. It was introduced to fix (workaround?) PR c++/17642, which looks too intrusive for the 3.4 branch. Instead, the C++ mistake on the 3.4 branch, that's w

[Bug c++/21174] name lookup differs between namespace-scope and global scope

--- Additional Comments From boris at kolpackov dot net 2005-04-23 16:56 --- EDG's frontend is not a definition of C++. Can you point to the verse in the standard? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21174

[Bug tree-optimization/18076] Missed jump threading optimization

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:54 --- Nice. And indeed surprising that the RTL DSE doesn't catch that trivially dead store. Should I open a separate bug report for that? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18076

[Bug tree-optimization/13761] [tree-ssa] component refs to the same struct should not alias

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:52 --- Will the second part of the struct alias merge fix Dann's original test case? ("http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Structure Aliasing Part II") -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13761

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:47 --- It is my belief that this is correct code, after all. An explicit interface is REQUIRED to invoke a procedure with a pointer or target dummy argument or a pointer function result. In other circumstances it

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

-- Bug 19794 depends on bug 16538, which changed state. Bug 16538 Summary: Missed jump threading opportunity with struct fields (but RTL thread_jumps does catch it) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16538 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug tree-optimization/16538] Missed jump threading opportunity with struct fields (but RTL thread_jumps does catch it)

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:47 --- This was fixed by just Dan's alias patches. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/21007] [4.1 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-2.c execution fails on hppa64-hpux and cris-elf

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:25 --- Started to pass again on hppa64-hpux between 20050422 and 20050423, could it be confirmed whether they pass again on cris-elf as well? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21007

[Bug middle-end/21082] &a[b] - &a[c] is not folded to b - c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:24 --- Zdenek was complaining about this in: . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21082

[Bug middle-end/20995] [3.4 regression] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1391

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-04-23 16:24 --- This is actually a C++ front-end bug. It looks like on the 3.4 branch ocp_convert is calling "fold" instead of "fold_if_not_in_template" (which is what happens on mainline). This call to "fold" triggers a chain

[Bug libf2c/19657] Namelist reading may be skipped if end with a logical variable

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:19 --- The namelist modifications implemented over the last week have resulted in namelist io that is compliant with the standard and this bug is fixed, as of GCC 4.1.0 20050423. -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 18210, which changed state. Bug 18210 Summary: namelist output format problems http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18210 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug libfortran/18210] namelist output format problems

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:18 --- The namelist modifications implemented over the last week have resulted in namelist io that is compliant with the standard and this bug is fixed, as of GCC 4.1.0 20050423. -- What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/18122] [4.0 only] gfortran internal error in namelist read

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:16 --- The namelist modifications implemented over the last week have resulted in namelist io that is compliant with the standard and this bug is fixed, as of GCC 4.1.0 20050423. -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

-- Bug 19276 depends on bug 19467, which changed state. Bug 19467 Summary: [4.0 only] ICE caused by CHARACTER array in NAMELIST read or write http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19467 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug fortran/19467] [4.0 only] ICE caused by CHARACTER array in NAMELIST read or write

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:15 --- The namelist modifications implemented over the last week have resulted in namelist io that is compliant with the standard and this bug is fixed, as of GCC 4.1.0 20050423. -- What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/18392] [4.0 only] segfault on derived type namelist input

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:14 --- The namelist modifications implemented over the last week have resulted in namelist io that is compliant with the standard and this bug is fixed, as of GCC 4.1.0 20050423. -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 17472, which changed state. Bug 17472 Summary: [4.0 only] namelist does not handle arrays http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17472 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug fortran/17472] [4.0 only] namelist does not handle arrays

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:13 --- The namelist modifications implemented over the last week have resulted in namelist io that is compliant with the standard and this bug is fixed, as of GCC 4.1.0 20050423. -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 17285, which changed state. Bug 17285 Summary: [4.0 only] namelist write does not terminate with &end http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17285 What|Old Value |New Value ---

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:12 --- The namelist modifications implemented over the last week have resulted in namelist io that is compliant with the standard and this bug is fixed, as of GCC 4.1.0 20050423. -- What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/19852] Segmentation fault during: build/genmodes -h > tmp-modes.h

--- Additional Comments From georg dot schwarz at freenet dot de 2005-04-23 16:11 --- I am seeing the same problem trying to bootstrap gcc-4.0.0 on IRIX 5.3: ... /bin/ksh /usr/people/schwarz/gcc-4.0.0/gcc/mkconfig.sh bconfig.h cc -c -g -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 12884, which changed state. Bug 12884 Summary: [4.0 only] error in reading a namelist when it is predeced by a line with a SLASH http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12884 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug libfortran/12884] [4.0 only] error in reading a namelist when it is predeced by a line with a SLASH

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:11 --- The namelist modifications implemented over the last week have resulted in namelist io that is compliant with the standard and this bug is fixed, as of GCC 4.1.0 20050423. -- What|Removed

[Bug SWING/21065] javax.swing.event.EventListenerList.getListenerList() implemented wrong

-- What|Removed |Added Component|libgcj |SWING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21065

[Bug libgcj/21065] javax.swing.event.EventListenerList.getListenerList() implemented wrong

-- What|Removed |Added Component|java|libgcj http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21065

[Bug other/21178] GCC4 series fails to compile glibc 2.3.x

--- Additional Comments From tobias at yoper dot com 2005-04-23 15:48 --- Subject: Re: GCC4 series fails to compile glibc 2.3.x this was fast, thanks you made my day :) Yoper Team Coordinator Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.

[Bug tree-optimization/21030] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range building 176.gcc with -O2

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-04-23 15:46 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range building 176.gcc with -O2 On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:11:52PM -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc d

[Bug tree-optimization/21170] [4.1 Regression] Comments still mention rewrite_ssa_into_ssa.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 15:41 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/19772] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] crash on invalid template friend decl

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19772

[Bug c++/21174] name lookup differs between namespace-scope and global scope

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 15:36 --- I think this is just how C++ works, Comeau's C++ front-end rejects the code in the same way -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21174

[Bug c++/21174] name lookup differs between namespace-scope and global scope

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.3 4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21174

[Bug bootstrap/21176] Cannot make on Solaris 9 (Intel)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 15:33 --- How did you configure GCC? -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug pch/10591] Members of anonymous namespaces get name mangled with header name

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 15:31 --- *** Bug 21179 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/21179] template in anonymous namespace in precompiled header

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 15:31 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10591 *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10591 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/16617] Fail to do access checking correctly for non-dependent qualified-id

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 15:30 --- This is a stage 2 project. Likely to be fixed in a month or two. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16617

[Bug c++/21179] template in anonymous namespace in precompiled header

--- Additional Comments From hans at jukesan dot de 2005-04-23 15:29 --- Created an attachment (id=8716) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8716&action=view) complete sources, include file, and makefile tar zxf bug21179, make and enjoy -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

  1   2   3   >