--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
As of LAST_UPDATED Tue Jun 28 05:54:07 UTC 2005 on x86_64-linux:
...
../../xgcc -B../../ -c -g -O2 -fPIC -W -Wall -gnatpg a-strfix.adb -o
a-strfix.o
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow (or erroneous memory access)
make[7]: *** [a-strfix.o] Error 1
make[7]: Leaving directory
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
07:16 ---
Thanks for reporting the problem. Note that you need to attach only one
preprocessed file. This is fixed in 3.4.3 an up.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17245 ***
--
What
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
07:16 ---
*** Bug 22169 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
When there is an exported shell-function 'dir()' and /bin/sh is bashish,
the make aborts very ugly (see below).
The problem is a quoting bug in gcc/mklibgcc.in, where the dir-variable
gets expanded by make, but make does not have the dir-variable set anywhere
and so puts in the shell-function.
GCC version 4.0.0 20050324 (prerelease)
Platform: win32
Java code:
import java.util.*;
public class X {
public void f() {
VectorDouble V = new VectorDouble();
}
}
--- Additional Comments From michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at
2005-06-28 08:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=9164)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9164action=view)
patch to quote dir-variable in mklibgcc.in correctly
I do not really expect this to go into
--- Additional Comments From greenrd at greenrd dot org 2005-06-28 09:18
---
Working on a patch, but bugzilla won't let me own this bug because it hasn't
been confirmed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
10:37 ---
Yes, GCJ doesn't support generics yet.
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|
/* g++ -O2 puts Undefined Global reference for statically defined function */
char *v;
static int server1(){ return 0; }
void func(){ (v?v:(v=0))[server1()]; }
Save the above into n.c and compile it with g++ -O2 -c n.c, then the
n.o includes Undefined Global __Z7server1v for statically defined
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-28 10:43
---
Also an ivopt SEGV during gnattools:
../../xgcc -c -I./ -I../rts -I. -I/home/guerby/work/gcc/version-head/gcc/ada
-B../../ -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata -I-
/home/guerby/work/gcc/version-head/gcc/ada/vms_conv.adb
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
10:43 ---
Subject: Bug 22170
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-28 10:43:23
Modified files:
libgfortran: ChangeLog
libgfortran/io :
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
10:43 ---
Well, this is fairly easy to fix. Commit will follow, and I'll be waiting for
the 4.0 branch to reopen to commit there.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-28 11:41
---
Humm, I wonder whether the problem isn't *really* trivial :)
In include/bits/c++config we have:
#ifdef _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
# if __GXX_WEAK__
# define _GLIBCXX_STD __gnu_norm
# define _GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE 0
...
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-28 11:45
---
Or, wrt Andrew's comment, AIX should really have, consistently with the docs:
#define __GXX_WEAK__ 1
??
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22205
-linux --enable-shared
--enable-threads --enable-__cxa_atexit --with-system-zlib
--with-system-libunwind
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 20050628 (experimental)
stage1/gnat1 -I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/ada -quiet -dumpbase par.adb -O2 -g
-gnatpg -gnata -gnatO ada/par.o ../../gcc/ada/par.adb
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 12:16
---
Subject: Re: New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:52:20AM -, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
Broken by patch from PR21959.
Are you sure? Kenner seemed to get good results from
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22213
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-06-28 12:42 ---
Are you sure?
Yes.
Show me '*pass'?
$1 = {name = 0x0, gate = 0,
execute = @0x41013990: 0x40b569d0 rest_of_compilation,
sub = 0x0, next = 0x0, static_pass_number = -1, tv_id = 116,
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-06-28 12:43 ---
-- Testcase for segfault in is_gimple_variable, compile with -O1:
procedure Bug is
package B is
function * (L : Natural; R : String) return String;
end B;
package body B is
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 12:52
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:42:03PM -, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
$1 = {name = 0x0, gate = 0,
execute = @0x41013990: 0x40b569d0
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-28 13:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests fail on
Tru64 UNIX V5.1B
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
Do these work now?
No, they still fail as of 20050627.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
13:29 ---
Looking at the backtrace, it looks more like one of Honza's patches rather than
the patch for PR21959.
On more likely the following patch (as I got a clean bootstrap on
powerpc-darwin with no problems
$ cat foo3.f90
program main
i = -1
print '(Z8)',i
end program main
$ gfortran foo3.f90
$ ./a.out
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.1-20050625/configure --prefix=/home/zfkts --enable-
languages=c,f95
Thread model: posix
gcc
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
13:45 ---
Could you post your patch to gcc-patches@ with a changelog and saying it only
for 3.4.x branch as it is
already fixed for 4.0.0 and above.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00
during full bootstrap of current mainline I get:
(...)
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/users/pluto/rpm/BUILD/gcc-4.1-20050628_0821/obj-i686-pld-linux/i686-pld-linux/libstdc++-v3'
Making all in include
make[4]: Entering directory
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
Keywords||build
Summary|no rule
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 13:57
---
Andrew is correct: name lookup proceeds from the present scope outward and
stops once it finds a matching name (note: name, not signature) or names. It
then tries to match the signature of the names to the
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 13:59
---
I concur, done.
W.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
14:06 ---
It is maybe a bit hard to investigate this bug because it actually causes
bootstrap failures on e.g. ia64, and even a normal make seems to produce
bad crt* stuff. So I took a different approach:
Index:
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 14:16
---
I do not understand the comment about GCC for AIX setting GXX_WEAK consistently.
The value is set by GCC itself, not overridden by AIX.
GXX_WEAK is defined by c-cppbuiltin.c:
if (flag_weak
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
14:17 ---
Confirmed. only a 3.4 regression.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 14:18
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:42:03PM -, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
Are you sure?
Yes.
You need to check your script then. The patch for 21959 had
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |
|org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-28 14:27
---
A clarification about __GXX_WEAK__: Andrew reports that, on AIX we have:
#define __GXX_WEAK__
If that is really the case (I cannot check, sorry), then the library is not
checking correctly the macro, because uses:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
14:31 ---
Subject: Bug 22189
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-28 14:31:29
Modified files:
libjava/gnu/gcj/runtime: PersistentByteMap.java
With current GCC CVS 4 of the added tests
(gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-{1,2,3,4}.c) fail with:
/usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-1.c: In function 'test2':
/usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-1.c:159: error:
Pointers with a memory tag, should have points-to sets
--- Additional Comments From greenrd at greenrd dot org 2005-06-28 15:12
---
Ignore previous comment. As a (probably overzealous) legal precaution, I will
not be submitting a patch. (For the record, I do not believe any of my previous
contributions are problematic in any way.)
Consider
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mandrake-linux-gnu/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--with-slibdir=/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info
--enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
16:37 ---
You no longer have to make -C gcc/ada gnatlib-shared.
If you install 4.0.0 does it work?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From smcconne at seakr dot com 2005-06-28 16:59
---
(In reply to comment #1)
You no longer have to make -C gcc/ada gnatlib-shared.
If you install 4.0.0 does it work?
make bootstrap seems to work.
I am able to compile Ada code using gcc -c I can also
It hangs when compiling gnat.
It stays in the following state.
ps -aux
smcconne 15294 0.0 0.5 3508 1492 pts/3S+ 11:27 0:00 make bootstrap
smcconne 15454 0.0 0.5 4064 1320 pts/3S+ 11:27 0:00
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
18:03 ---
This was just fixed.
See PR 21959.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21959 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
18:03 ---
*** Bug 1 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
19:19 ---
Subject: Bug 22134
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-28 19:19:29
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/i386:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
19:29 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
The new gcc.c-torture/compile/20050622-1.c testcase fails on Tru64 UNIX
V5.1B:
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20050622-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20050622-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
currfunc_frameoffset = 75497488
currfunc_regoffset =
--- Additional Comments From ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 19:59
---
Created an attachment (id=9166)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9166action=view)
Failing assembler input
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional Comments From markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2005-06-28
20:01 ---
I can confirm this issue. Running :
mv /usr/local/include/options.h /usr/local/include/options.h_
before building gcc40 solves the problem...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21268
Between 20050525 and 20050627 there appeared a couple of new libstdc++
testsuite failures on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B:
+FAIL: 23_containers/bitset/18604.cc (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: 23_containers/deque/14340.cc (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: 23_containers/deque/18604.cc (test for excess errors)
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-28 20:03
---
This is basically the same issue of 22205 and we are certainly going to add the
needed DejaGNU bits (note, however, that, to date it's not completely clear
what's exactly going wrong on AIX)
--
What
Several testcases fail producing invalid assembler code, e.g.
FAIL: gcc.dg/gnu89-init-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
as1: Warning: /tmp//ccuPshWt.s, line 1: Length of .lcomm was less than 1:
__compound_literal.1
FAIL: gcc.dg/range-test-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Version|unknown |4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 20:24
---
The same problem occurs on alpha-dec-osf5.1b as of 20050627:
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/singleton.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
20:26 ---
struct A {} a;
is another testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22006
The gcc.dg/vect/pr18536.c testcase fails on alpha-dec-osf5.1b:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr18536.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/vol/gnu/src/gcc/gcc-dist/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr18536.c:13: internal
compiler error: in alphaev4_insn_pipe, at config/alpha/alpha.c:8625
Environment:
System:
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-28 20:36 ---
Subject: Re: New: Tru64 UNIX testsuite failure: gcc.dg/vect/pr18536.c: ICE in
in alphaev4_insn_pipe
There are several more identical failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-1char.c (test for
--- Additional Comments From ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 20:39
---
Also occurs on alpha-dec-osf5.1b as of 20050627:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-97.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/vol/gnu/src/gcc/gcc-dist/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-97.c:11: error:
Definition in block
GCC generic vector support should call IBM MASSV and Intel VML vector libraries.
--
Summary: vectorization library
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-06-28 21:12 ---
segfault in is_gimple_variable caused by this patch:
2005-06-07 Sebastian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR 18403 and meta PR 21861.
* Makefile.in (tree-chrec.o): Depend on CFGLOOP_H
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
21:20 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 21:31
---
I suspect this is because in your version of the current libstdc++ sources, some
directories are missing.
Try 'cvs update -d' to get all the directories and files.
Then, make sure you have this file in your
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 21:32
---
mine
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
21:57 ---
Subject: Bug 22142
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-28 21:57:45
Modified files:
libgfortran: ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
22:07 ---
Fixed by:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030708-1.c: Remove static from test function.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-1.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030714-1.c,
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-1.c,
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
22:08 ---
Hmm, I cannot reproduce this with a cross compiler but that might be because I
am using powerpc-
darwin7.9.0's ada includes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22212
G++ thinks that a nested type is a nested class and it expects a constructor,
destructor, or type conversion before the object referenced in the class is
processed when compiling a function of a nested type defined in the header file
of a templated class.
Header file below
//C++ STL classes
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 22:49
---
Created an attachment (id=9167)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9167action=view)
patch
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 22:53
---
simplify_gen_subreg of a complex MEM creates a SUBREG that cannot be recognized.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21742
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
22:53 ---
Do you have the full source, use -save-temps and attach the preprocessed source
(the .ii file).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 22:57
---
I tried to understand what you want to say, but couldn't. Would you mind
sending us a little piece of (complete, compilable) code that compiles with
SunCC but not with gcc?
Thanks
Wolfgang
--
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Severity|critical
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:06
---
Cutting another line or two:
---
extern double sqrt (double) throw ();
void foo(double d, int n)
{
double e=0;
for(int i=0; in; i++);
for(int i=0; in; i++) e=1;
d = sqrt(e);
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:07 ---
Subject: Bug 22142
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-28 23:07:22
Modified files:
libgfortran: ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:10
---
Volker, your testcase does not fail anymore. Should we close this PR? I
have other testcases that fail with the same error message and for which
I will open another PR shortly...
W.
--
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:11 ---
Fixed on 4.1, waiting for 4.0 to reopen.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:16 ---
Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02135.html.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:16 ---
Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02135.html.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:17
---
Andrew's code in comment #4 is invalid (don't call no-arg functions with
arguments!), but here's a version that also passes through the c++
frontend and crashes the optimizers:
--
int
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:20 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Andrew's code in comment #4 is invalid (don't call no-arg functions with
arguments!), but here's a version that also passes through the c++
frontend and crashes the optimizers:
Attached code fails like so:
spec/src /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-4.1-pre/bin/c++ -O3 -march=pentium4
-ftree-vectorize -c mapping_cartesian.ii
mapping_cartesian.cc: In constructor
#8216;MappingCartesiandim::InternalData::InternalData(const
Quadraturedim)
[with int dim = 3]#8217;:
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:22
---
Created an attachment (id=9168)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9168action=view)
Preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:23
---
See PR 8...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21218
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:24 ---
Most likely the same bug which is causing a bootstrap regression:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-06/msg00090.html
And Also PR 22037
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.1 regression] ICE with - |[4.1 regression] ICE with -
|ftree-vectorize |ftree-vectorize in
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:25
---
This may be the same as PR 8, which still fails as of today...
W.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||21859
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:29 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
This may be the same as PR 8, which still fails as of today...
I really doubt it because this only involves one loop and the other involves
multiple loops.
--
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:31
---
I don't think its the same as PR 22037 -- they have different error messages!
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:41 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I don't think its the same as PR 22037 -- they have different error messages!
Actually you are right, this is vectorizer bug and the other one is a differnt
one.
--
jcurran2 at uiuc dot edu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| G++ thinks that a nested type is a nested class and it expects a constructor,
| destructor, or type conversion before the object referenced in the class is
| processed when compiling a function of a nested type defined in the header
file
|
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-06-29 00:00 ---
Subject: Re: New: g++ 4.0.0 has issues with the typedef of reference
jcurran2 at uiuc dot edu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| G++ thinks that a nested type is a nested class and it expects a
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29
00:11 ---
Subject: Re: Perfect nest transformation not
conservative enough
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 23:17 +, bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29
00:11 ---
Subject: Bug 22052
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-29 00:11:37
Modified files:
gcc: c-decl.c ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29
00:11 ---
Subject: Bug 21975
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-29 00:11:37
Modified files:
gcc: c-decl.c ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29
01:59 ---
This is now rejected like it should.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
