--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
10:48 ---
Subject: Bug 23434
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-21 10:48:23
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
10:59 ---
Subject: Bug 23433
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-21 10:59:15
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-chrec.c
Added files:
--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21 11:06
---
It showed up as random crashes in some mauve tests.
Such as gnu.testlet.java.awt.image.PixelGrabber.SimpleGrabber
Fixed by:
2004-08-08 Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
--- Additional Comments From sbodomerle at gmail dot com 2005-08-21 11:30
---
(In reply to comment #1)
I tried to run this under JamVM+Classpath:
$ jamvm -Dpython.home=/home/fitzsim/jython-2.1 -classpath
/home/fitzsim/jython-2.1/jython.jar org.python.util.jython
Jython 2.1 on
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
14:53 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
14:53 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 15:12
---
I can't reproduce this on Classpath CVS HEAD. Resolving as fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 15:36
---
I've fixed the locking problems, and changed how resizing works so that it
doesn't happen in the GTK thread. Although I don't have an Alpha to test on, my
guess is that this won't happen anymore. Please
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 15:47
---
JTable is implemented now. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 16:08
---
This bug boils down to: we don't have a complete implementation of
javax.swing.text.html yet. I'm going to create a new bug for that and close
this one as a duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|graydon at redhat dot com |abalkiss at redhat dot com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|graydon at redhat dot com |abalkiss at redhat dot com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 16:19
---
This is partially fixed. However, clicking again anywhere on the JMenuBar
itself should also close the menu. Currently clicking on the empty part of the
JMenuBar doesn't close the menu.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 17:04
---
I tested this with twm and committed a fix. Now, other than heavyweight popup
menus having a frame, which is a little strange, but WM-dependent, everything
seems fine. Closing.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 17:42
---
This has been fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
We have in c-common.c:
#define DEF_BUILTIN(ENUM, NAME, CLASS, TYPE, LIBTYPE, BOTH_P, FALLBACK_P, \
NONANSI_P, ATTRS, IMPLICIT, COND) \
if (NAME COND) \
def_builtin_1 (ENUM, NAME, CLASS,
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-21 18:02 ---
It is a gcc bug and has been fixed in CVS:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .libs]$ readelf --wide -s/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 | grep
_ZNSs4_Rep20_S_empty_rep_s | c++filt
1536: 000e3ef816 OBJECT WEAK DEFAULT 25
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-21 18:02 ---
*** Bug 22185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 18:30
---
Patch committed, thanks.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
Keywords||documentation
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
19:29 ---
The main reason why it is documented, it is not a real configure option. But
we (autoconf) ignores
unknown --with options.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23430
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-21 20:22 ---
Wrong duplicated bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-21 20:25 ---
The real isssue is you can't use
#pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
on libstdc++ and glibc since they don't support them. We need to fix both glibc
and libstdc++ header files.
*** This bug has been marked as a
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-21 20:25 ---
*** Bug 22185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
FAIL: Class_1 execution - gij test
FAIL: Class_1 execution - gij test
FAIL: InvokeInterface execution - gij test
FAIL: InvokeInterface execution - gij test
FAIL: PR12350 execution - gij test
FAIL: PR12350 execution - gij test
FAIL: PR12416 execution - gij test
FAIL: PR12416 execution - gij test
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 20:27
---
Fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From ddneilson at gmail dot com 2005-08-21 20:28
---
One of the really odd things, that makes me still think this is a bug in some
way is that the definition of mysignbit() that I gave in signbit.cpp is
identical to the definition of __signbitf(x) as given in
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 20:28
---
Done. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
FAIL: PR218 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: PR218 execution - bytecode-native test
FAIL: PR218 -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: PR218 -O3 execution - bytecode-native test
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/objdir/hppa-linux/libjava/testsuite/..
/libtool --silent --tag=GCJ
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
20:31 ---
Again this is not a bug as signbitf says about nonzero value and nothing about
the exact value. In fact
it changes based on optimizations is because well some times it is for size
reasons, look at -Os
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
20:34 ---
pa32_fallback_frame_state should have taken care of this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23508
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-21 20:40 ---
One solution is to put
#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
...
#pragma GCC visibility pop
around all libc and libstdc++ header files, like
#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
#include iostream.h
#pragma GCC
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fitzsim at redhat dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-08-21 20:52 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: PR218
pa32_fallback_frame_state should have taken care of this.
Possibly, there is a bug there. However, the enclosed change
appears to fix libgcj/23507 and partially fixes
Test case:
void block_diffs_C(int *ss, int *new, int ns, int *newp) {
int x, y, s = 0;
for (x = 0; x 8; x++) {
newp = new++;
for (y = 0; y 4; y++)
s += *newp++;
*ss = s;
}
}
With GNU C version 4.1.0 20050810 (experimental)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
21:19 ---
Confirmed.
There are different ICE on different targets:
on x86-linux-gnu: t.c:1: internal compiler error: in finalize_ssa_uses, at
tree-ssa-operands.c:580
on ppc-darwin: t.c:1: internal compiler error:
Attempt to compile the following code using the comamnd 'g++ -g -Wall -ansi
-pedantic -c Filename.cpp':
#include iostream
templateunsigned int nFactor
struct Factorial
{
enum { nValue = nFactor * FactorialnFactor - 1::nValue };
}
template
struct Factorial0
{
enum { nValue = 1 };
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
22:23 ---
I think this is a dup of bug 9335.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23510
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
22:25 ---
That stack trace looks a bit peculiar.
But maybe it is just that it hasn't been cleaned up to remove
the frames related to constructing the exception.
I think the only thing to do here is go in and find out
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
22:27 ---
The patch in comment #2 is ok, please check it in.
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23508
Nervous members of the wildly popular online social networking spot are
blasting its purchase by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., expressing dark fears
about the powerful billionaire's alleged motives and the possibility of privacy
breaches, monitoring, censorship -- and access fees. A lot of
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-21
23:35 ---
Subject: Bug 23507
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-21 23:35:46
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog stacktrace.cc
Log
Nervous members of the wildly popular online social networking spot are
blasting its purchase by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., expressing dark fears
about the powerful billionaire's alleged motives and the possibility of privacy
breaches, monitoring, censorship -- and access fees. A lot of
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-08-22
00:39 ---
confirmed on current mainline and 4.0 branch. A powerpc-linux targetted
compiler hits the ICE when given -ffast-math -mcall-eabi -msdata=default.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
01:27 ---
SH is not a primary or secondary target; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
01:28 ---
Alpha is not a primary or secondary target; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
01:35 ---
Interix is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
01:40 ---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
01:42 ---
Ada bugs are not release critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
01:44 ---
Removing target milestone, per previous comment.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
01:47 ---
Removing target milestone per last comment.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:18 ---
Removing target milestone per previous comment.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:18 ---
Removing target milestone per previous comment.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:19 ---
Ada is not a primary language and alpha is not a primary or secondary platform;
removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:20 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg01203.html
contains the lastest patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:20 ---
Objective-C is not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:21 ---
Removing target milestone per Comment #4.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:23 ---
Ada is not release-critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:25 ---
Java bugs are not release-critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:25 ---
Ada is not release-critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:26 ---
Ada is not release-critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:36 ---
Objective-C is not release-critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:38 ---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:40 ---
Ada is not release-critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:52 ---
Objective-C is not release critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
02:52 ---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:07 ---
Subject: Bug 23485
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-22 03:07:44
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/ia64:
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-08-22
03:08 ---
Regression introduced 2004-06-22 Dale Johannesen,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01583.html. Testing a fix that
uses legitimate_small_data_p instead of Sergei's more liberal change.
--
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:24 ---
MMIX is not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:27 ---
There's nothing that suggests that we can reproduce this bug, so I've closed it.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 22396 depends on bug 21350, which changed state.
Bug 21350 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] release now requires bision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:30 ---
Java bugs are not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:34 ---
Java bugs are not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:36 ---
Ada bugs are not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:37 ---
Fortran is not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:39 ---
alpha is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:40 ---
Java bugs are not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-22 03:44 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:45 ---
Ada is not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:46 ---
MMIX is not a primary of secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:50 ---
This shows up on more than mmix, I should have marked this as such.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:52 ---
Fortran is not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
04:43 ---
Fortran is not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
04:44 ---
SH is not a primary or secondary target; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
04:45 ---
Ada bugs are not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
04:49 ---
Ada bugs are not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
04:55 ---
CRIS is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
04:56 ---
Objective-C is not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
04:57 ---
Ada is not release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target
=gnu99 -version -o strptime_l.s
GNU C version 4.1.0 20050821 (experimental) (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.1.0 20050821 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
Compiler executable checksum: 5a830930ea2c878ce9ab608e6b40e0e8
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22 05:01
---
Created an attachment (id=9550)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9550action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23511
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
05:03 ---
I think the knock-on error message is a latent bug in the C++ front end, so your
patch is fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23426
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
05:03 ---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
05:08 ---
Although this does effect the installation process, it's still not
release-critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
05:15 ---
How does the C front end represent this expression?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
05:57 ---
My understanding is that this is not Fortran-specific, but
that Fortran happens to have a test case that exposes this
bug. Has anybody constructed a C test case?
--
96 matches
Mail list logo
