--- Comment #10 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2007-10-10
06:08 ---
This bug is not fixed by r129193
--
belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-10-10 06:44 ---
forward_propagate_and_simplify only propagates into single-set insns. In
principle there's nothing to forbid working on other insns (it already does it
for forward_propagate_subreg), but it is made harder because df does
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 06:50 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Hmmm, that's not right, is it? It should be
PROGRAM TST
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER :: P(4),I
integer, allocatable :: Q(:)
P = (/2,4,1,3/)
allocate (Q(size(P)))
Q = P
FORALL(I=1:4)
--- Comment #5 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 06:31 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00538.html
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #27 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 07:05 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
char.3 = (*(char[0:][1:1] *) atmp.0.data)[S.2][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
(*(char[0:][1:1] *) atmp.1.data)[S.2] = char.3;
the first line is correct, the second is not.
For
--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-10-10 07:35 ---
*** Bug 33138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32370
--- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-10-10 07:59 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Revision 128957 causes this regression.
I can confirm that r128956 bootstraps OK when configured with
--build=i386-pc-linux-gnu. Also, r128956 compiles and runs testcase from
comment #8 without
--- Comment #1 from kostikbel at ukr dot net 2007-10-10 08:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=14335)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14335action=view)
Fix for free() after putenv() on FreeBSD 7.x
The patch allowed me to bootstrap gcc 4.2.2 on the FreeBSD 7.x with
gnat
Created an attachment (id=14335)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14335action=view)
Fix for free() after putenv() on FreeBSD 7.x
The patch allowed me to bootstrap gcc 4.2.2 on the FreeBSD 7.x with
gnat enabled.
Patch looks good to me. OK for 4.2 branch and trunk.
Arno
The putenv() in the FreeBSD 7.x is made posix-conforming, that means
that the function does not make the copy of the argument string for entering
it into the environment.
As consequence, gcc/ada/env.c, __gnat_setenv() function shall not call
free() on the malloc'ed string. Otherwise, memory of
--- Comment #2 from charlet at adacore dot com 2007-10-10 08:18 ---
Subject: Re: putenv() is made posix-conformant on FreeBSD 7.x
Created an attachment (id=14335)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14335action=view)
--
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 09:06 ---
Maybe regstack needs to be taught how to swap stack register loads to avoid the
fxch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26902
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 09:19 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Here's my plan for the legacy hash containers:
1) port debug mode to tr1 associative containers
2) move ext/hash containers to deprecated
Thoughts?
Certainly, I agree with the (mid term?)
--- Comment #33 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 08:57 ---
What happened with the suggestion to only do this in reassoc2 (see comment
#27)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32183
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 09:24
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 09:24 ---
Subject: Bug 33381
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 10 09:24:43 2007
New Revision: 129197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129197
Log:
2007-10-10 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 09:24 ---
Subject: Bug 33099
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 10 09:24:43 2007
New Revision: 129197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129197
Log:
2007-10-10 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 09:25
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 09:29
---
Subject: Bug 31899
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 10 09:29:13 2007
New Revision: 129199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129199
Log:
2007-10-10 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 09:29
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-10 09:35 ---
Are the codes in #7 and #8 supposed to behave differently?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33686
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 09:57 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 10:02 ---
Subject: Bug 33369
Author: uros
Date: Wed Oct 10 10:01:53 2007
New Revision: 129201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129201
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2007-09-14 Uros Bizjak
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 10:02 ---
Subject: Bug 33438
Author: uros
Date: Wed Oct 10 10:01:53 2007
New Revision: 129201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129201
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2007-09-14 Uros Bizjak
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
At -O2 we should IMNSHO generate the same code for all 3 functions:
typedef union
{
struct
{
int f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7, f8;
long int f9, f10;
int f11;
} f;
char s[56];
long int a;
} T;
void
foo (void)
{
T t;
t = (T) { { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 } };
test
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 11:23
---
The problem is that we try simplification in find_array_section() because the
vector subscript is EXPR_ARRAY, which is not necessarily constant (in this
case, the values in the constructor depend on variable i).
struct xt_entry_target {
unsigned char name[1];
};
struct ipt_entry {
unsigned char elems[1];
};
void match_different(const unsigned char *);
int dump_entry(struct xt_entry_target *t)
{
return __builtin_strcmp (t-name, );
}
void is_same(const struct ipt_entry *a)
{
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 11:34 ---
The problem here is that some times we use build_pointer_type () and sometimes
we use build_pointer_type_for_mode (). If the latter is called with ref-all
true (as done from builtins.c for unsigned char) we get
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 11:37 ---
Another fix would be to exchange the fix for PR19382 by only doing the
folding of builtin_memcmp if the alias set of unsigned char is zero.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33724
--- Comment #12 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-10 11:41
---
I will look at it today.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33676
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 11:49 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
|
--
zadeck at naturalbridge dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|33669 |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |zadeck at
This testcase:
--cut here--
extern const int foo (int a);
extern const int bar (int a);
int test (int a)
{
return foo (a) + bar (a);
}
--cut here--
compiles to:
test:
subl$12, %esp
movl%ebx, 4(%esp)
movl16(%esp), %ebx
movl%esi, 8(%esp)
--- Comment #11 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2007-10-10 13:23 ---
I understand that those symbols have to be renamed, I am just saying that maybe
it should be done in the gimplifier and not in the vectorizer. But since
force_gimple_operand_bsi also goes through the statements list,
--- Comment #2 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 12:59 ---
I have a patch for this. Unfortunately, while playing around with testcases I
found a new segfault, so I'll have to look into this before submitting.
Failing testcase:
! { dg-do run }
! { dg-options -fbounds-check }
--- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:28 ---
Not fixed by r129192. I see
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33669.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33669.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33669.c execution, -Os
on
--- Comment #4 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-10 13:33
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Wrong register allocation
on SH
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:28
---
Not fixed by r129192. I
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:38
---
Subject: Bug 33636
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Oct 10 13:38:38 2007
New Revision: 129208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129208
Log:
PR fortran/33636
* expr.c
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:39 ---
The C FE strips qualifier in building the ARRAY_REF. I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:41
---
Subject: Bug 33391
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Oct 10 13:40:50 2007
New Revision: 129209
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129209
Log:
PR testsuite/33391
*
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:41
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 13:42
---
Testcase fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 13:52 ---
There are
-- Macro: STACK_BOUNDARY
Define this macro to the minimum alignment enforced by hardware
for the stack pointer on this machine. The definition is a C
expression for the desired alignment (measured
pb-d-128-141-24-81:~/src/pr tobi$ cat t.f90
program array_char
implicit none
character (len=2) :: x, y
character (len=2) :: z(2)
x = a
y = cd
z = [y(1:len(trim(y))), x(1:1)] ! causes segfault
end program array_char
pb-d-128-141-24-81:~/src/pr tobi$ ../hggcc/build/gcc/f951 t.f90
MAIN__
t.f90:6:
--- Comment #3 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 14:23 ---
The failure from #2 is now PR 33727.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33254
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 13:54 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
STACK_BOUNDARY = PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY = INCOMING_STACK_BOUNDARY
But for backward compatibility, we can only do it with a command line
option.
--
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-10 14:38 ---
Note that the (IMHO) valid code:
program array_char
implicit none
character (len=2) :: x, y
character (len=2) :: z(2)
x = a
y = cd
z = (/y(1:len(trim(x))), x(1:len(trim(x)))/) ! causes segfault
print *, z
end
I have a block of code:
struct LatLon : public Coord
{
std::string lat;
std::string lon;
inline LatLon() : lat(), lon() {}
};
Coord* coord;
coord = new LatLon();
static_castconst LatLon*(coord)-lat = static_castconst
LatLon*(other.coord)-lat;
--- Comment #4 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 14:40 ---
OTOH this works:
program array_char
implicit none
character (len=2) :: x
character (len=1) :: z
x = a
z = x(1:len(trim(x)))
end program array_char
So the problem is with array constructors.
--
--- Comment #1 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 14:25 ---
There's a disabled check in bounds_check_10.f90 (to be submitted) which depends
on this bug, please enable it after fixing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33727
--- Comment #2 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 14:34 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
There's a disabled check in bounds_check_10.f90 (to be submitted) which
depends
on this bug, please enable it after fixing.
Scratch that, of course after the first runtime error the
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:24 ---
Subject: Bug 33633
Author: bkoz
Date: Wed Oct 10 15:23:59 2007
New Revision: 129210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129210
Log:
2007-10-10 Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #28 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:44 ---
The patch below fixes the lot. It was not necessary in the end to touch
trans-intrinsic.c. Once the appropriate, offending bit of trans-array.c was
fixed, all the casting occurred correctly. The fixes to
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:45 ---
This should be fixed now. Please confirm and close.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de 2007-10-10 15:47 ---
Subject: Re: wrong types in character array/scalar binop
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, pault at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #28 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:44
---
The patch below
--- Comment #6 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:49 ---
Fixed.
Current debug mode results (ie, with make CXXFLAGS=-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG check)
FAIL: 20_util/pair/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/deque/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL:
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 15:52 ---
Yes, time to fix the moveable.cc tests in debug-mode. Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:08 ---
Hans,
Is the attached patch correct?
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 17:36 ---
The moveable.cc fails are now fixed. Otherwise, a couple of fails are also
trivial
23_containers/vector/bool/capacity/29134.cc
23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc
_S_word_size in the wrong namespace.
On 10 Oct 2007 08:58:00 -, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #33 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 08:57
---
What happened with the suggestion to only do this in reassoc2 (see comment
#27)?
Yeah, i'm not sure why we just made both
--- Comment #34 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:43
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] reassoc2 can more extra calculations into a loop
On 10 Oct 2007 08:58:00 -, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #33 from steven at gcc dot
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30801
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32086
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32590
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32653
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33168
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:52
---
The original submitter says the problem has disappeared.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:53
---
Dave --
Is this fixed with Jan's patch? If so, please close.
Thanks,
-- Mark
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33318
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33319
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368
--- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:56 ---
Sweet, thanks. Any chance you could put in the
23_containers/vector/bool/capacity/29134.cc
23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc
fix too? My sources are in pre-deprecate mode right now...
best,
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:57
---
I understand that we don't know whether this is a problem in GCC or in Perl.
However, until we know, I think this should be P1 -- having GCC releases that
don't work with SPEC, without an explanation, undermines
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 17:57 ---
I don't have a fix ;) Everything seems rather ugly and not worth the trouble...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:58
---
We really need to fix this class of problems. Every release of GCC over the
past couple of years has had serious aliasing issues that caused real-world
programs to fall over. We can fix this by making the
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33434
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33458
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33500
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33624
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33644
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33670
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33673
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33680
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33645
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33461
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33509
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33545
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 18:10
---
And, if profiling data is required, then we should issue an error saying that,
not fall over.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 18:24 ---
Subject: Bug 32295
Author: jsm28
Date: Wed Oct 10 18:24:29 2007
New Revision: 129215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129215
Log:
PR c/32295
* c-typeck.c (default_conversion): Call
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 18:31 ---
Fixed for 4.2.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-10-10 18:44 ---
Changed the title to better reflect what was transpiring.
This problem has since been fixed, so I am closing it.
--
nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
I just tried to compile the following C++ source code
with the GNU C++ compiler version 4.3 snapshot 20071005.
static extern c;
The compiler said
testProg.cc:3: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'c' with no type
testProg.cc:3: error: conflicting specifiers in declaration of 'c'
--- Comment #6 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-10-10
19:26 ---
Fixed.
--
dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
