[Bug ada/37309] Ada tasking is not implemented on NetBSD

--- Comment #1 from aran at 100acres dot us 2008-09-01 06:17 --- Created an attachment (id=16176) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16176&action=view) Patch and supporting files. The tar contains a patch for gcc/ada/Makefile.in and the necessary supporting files. -

[Bug ada/37309] New: Ada tasking is not implemented on NetBSD

Ada tasking is not implemented on NetBSD. -- Summary: Ada tasking is not implemented on NetBSD Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigne

[Bug middle-end/20283] optimising muldiv() type operations

--- Comment #6 from ajrobb at bigfoot dot com 2008-09-01 05:50 --- OK - it's me again. I have formulated a general case optimization - I should keep quiet now ;-) : /* Demonstrate a general fast multiply and divide by rational number. * Both methods agree over the entire domain: 0..0xf

[Bug bootstrap/37308] New: bootstrap hug on libstdc++.a

gcc 4.2.4 works well, and not support "__thead". gcc 4.3.2 bootstrap hug on libstdc++.a. but when I use --disable-tls, hug the same.. === AIX 5.1 doesn't supprt TLS. Only supported on AIX® for POWER™ version 5.3 with the 5300-05 Tech

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] Bootstrap failure due to __muldi3

--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 05:18 --- Here's a backtrace. mobile:kargl[281] gdb /usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/./gcc/cc1 GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] (gdb) run b.c Starting program: /usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1 b.c main Analyzing compilation unit Performing inter

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] Bootstrap failure due to __muldi3

--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 05:10 --- Reverted my back out of the 3 patches mentioned in comment #6 and update to top of tree, which was revision 139848. If I read the threads pointed to in comment #5, I already had the patches in my tree. It still brok

[Bug pch/37307] [4.4 Regression]: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C

--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 04:01 --- Range narrowed. Working: 139760, failing: 139763. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37307

[Bug c++/37302] function parameters are declared too late

-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] Bootstrap failure due to __muldi3

--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 03:31 --- Added my other email address -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] Bootstrap failure due to __muldi3

--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 03:30 --- (In reply to comment #5) > It might be an IRA bug. > > Could you try two latest patches > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02279.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02377.html > > I hav

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] Bootstrap failure due to __muldi3

--- Comment #5 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-09-01 03:24 --- It might be an IRA bug. Could you try two latest patches http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02279.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02377.html I have not got an approval for them yet so they

[Bug tree-optimization/37307] New: [4.4 Regression]: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C

With revision 139755 this test passed. >From revision 139763 and on, this test has failed as follows: Running /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pch/pch.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 -g assembly comparison with the message in the logfile being: PASS: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O

[Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c

--- Comment #78 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 01:42 --- FWIW, the results in certainly look clean enough to be usable as a baseline. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170

[Bug c++/37306] New: code generation error

Version 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8) the following code: double* dr = new double[ nn ]; double aa = 28.68, bb=28.35;// any numbers will do, the point is // these numbers don't have large exponents ... *(dr+ii) = (aa - bb) / bb; // produces anomalous res

[Bug fortran/37274] [Regression 4.4 (and 4.3?)] error: type name is ambiguous.

--- Comment #13 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-31 23:34 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Actually, my comment #7 seems to be more related to bug #36374. No, it's not -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37274

DOG SEX TUBE

Hi to all. Private videos dog sex tube. Here they are: http://videos.videosextube2009.com/dog-sex-tube.html --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BodySolutionsRX - Hcg and Kevin Trudeau" group. To post to t

[Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c

--- Comment #77 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 22:51 --- (In reply to comment #76) > Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c > > > Is this really a regression? I mean "regression, compared to unpatched". > Yes, but it may not have anything to do with your chang

[Bug fortran/37274] [Regression 4.4 (and 4.3?)] error: type name is ambiguous.

--- Comment #12 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-31 21:52 --- Actually, my comment #7 seems to be more related to bug #36374. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37274

[Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c

--- Comment #76 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-08-31 21:31 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c > Is this really a regression? Yes, but it may not have anything to do with your change. Looking through my test results, I see it started failing bet

[Bug fortran/37301] libgfortran/io/write.c:304: warning: unused variable 'j'

--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 21:26 --- I will look into this. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/37305] [4.4 Regression] ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:397

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug c/37305] New: ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:397

prefix=/home/regehr --enable-languages=c,c++ --no-create --no-recursion Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20080831 (experimental) (GCC) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/volatile/tmp17$ cat small.c typedef int int32_t; typedef unsigned int uint32_t; static inline int safe_add_s_s (int si1, int si2) { if ((s

[Bug fortran/37274] [Regression 4.4 (and 4.3?)] error: type name is ambiguous.

--- Comment #11 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-31 21:16 --- (In reply to comment #10) > I think your example should be rejected, but it is not like my code, where > smooth_mesh explicitly USEs class_vector. So, I am not sure what's your > point. My point is this: As yo

[Bug bootstrap/37304] [4.4 Regression]: in-tree-binutils gcc configure tests fail because of unexpanded $(objdir)

--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 21:12 --- ...and, to emphasize, this is *not* build-breaking, just perhaps turning off a feature or two. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37304

[Bug bootstrap/37304] [4.4 Regression]: in-tree-binutils gcc configure tests fail because of unexpanded $(objdir)

--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 21:07 --- Maybe "bootstrap" is a more fitting component. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug driver/37304] [4.4 Regression]: in-tree-binutils gcc configure tests fail because of unexpanded $(objdir)

--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 21:04 --- To wit, it does *not* happen for (pre-)installed binutils. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37304

[Bug driver/37304] New: [4.4 Regression]: in-tree-binutils gcc configure tests fail because of unexpanded $(objdir)

With a binutils in-tree aka. combined tree, you'll see this non-breaking bug in the build logs at e.g. revision 139804 Configuring in ./gcc ... checking if the linker (ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... $(objdir)/../binutils/nm-new checking the name lister

[Bug libstdc++/37298] no output when use wcout and cout, wrong utf16 -> utf8 conversion

--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-31 20:57 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Very strange uft16->utf8 conversion seems be very easy, and required for > proper output on contemporary Linux. By the way, contemporary Linux, or any Linux for that matter, is

[Bug c/37303] New: const compound initializers in structs are written to .data instead of .rodata

GCC generates identical code for the following two structures: const struct { const int *p; } foo = { (const int []) {1, 2, 3} }; const struct { int *p; } foo = { (int []) {1, 2, 3} }; In both cases, the struct is written to the .rodata section, but the array {1, 2, 3} is written to the .dat

[Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c

--- Comment #75 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 20:33 --- (In reply to comment #74) > > Patch, take 6. > > This one is a significant improvement. In the C testsuite, I'm > seeing a few failures like this one: > > Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/g

[Bug tree-optimization/37299] libgcc2.c:806: ICE: vector VEC(me m_ref_p,base) index domain error, in create_vop_ref_mapping_loop at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:1519

--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 20:30 --- The problem in comment #2 is the libgmp/libmpfr installation. I accidentally installed the shared versions which have a dependency on libgcc_s.sl. As a result, the following fails: configure:2611: /test/gnu/gcc/ob

[Bug libstdc++/37298] no output when use wcout and cout, wrong utf16 -> utf8 conversion

--- Comment #3 from jaworski at autograf dot pl 2008-08-31 20:14 --- Subject: Re: no output when use wcout and cout, wrong utf16 -> utf8 conversion > currently, by > default, cout, wcout, etc, are non-converting in our implementation. Very strange uft16->utf8 conversion seems be v

[Bug tree-optimization/37299] libgcc2.c:806: ICE: vector VEC(me m_ref_p,base) index domain error, in create_vop_ref_mapping_loop at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:1519

--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 19:21 --- Yes. I can't duplicate this any more. I've been updating to gmp-4.2.3. Now, I get a build error much earlier: checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in `/test/gnu/gcc/objdi r/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] Bootstrap failure due to __muldi3

--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 18:39 --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Vlad, caused by the IRA merge? > > Yes, see my message on [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I cannot reproduce it anymore > today (r139820) > on Linux, can you on FreeBSD? > It is not fixed on Fre

[Bug libstdc++/37298] no output when use wcout and cout, wrong utf16 -> utf8 conversion

--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-31 18:24 --- By the way, your testcases are strictly speaking invalid, because you cannot mix operations on cout and wcout, per 27.3 (there is some discussion in libstdc++/11705). Fixed that, the issue is the same as 35353,

[Bug c++/37302] New: function parameters are declared too late

3.3.1: The point of declaration for a name is immediately after its complete declarator (clause 8) and before its initializer (if any) 3.3.2: The potential scope of a function parameter name ... begins at its point of declaration. So this ought to be well-formed: void f (int t, char (*buf_p)[siz

[Bug libstdc++/35353] C++ wide character locale doesn't work

--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-31 18:15 --- *** Bug 37298 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libstdc++/37298] no output when use wcout and cout, wrong utf16 -> utf8 conversion

--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-31 18:15 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35353 *** -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/37301] New: libgfortran/io/write.c:304: warning: unused variable 'j'

Found at the IRC: ../../../build/gcc-svn/gcc/libgfortran/io/write.c:304: warning: unused variable 'j' -- Summary: libgfortran/io/write.c:304: warning: unused variable 'j' Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/37299] libgcc2.c:806: ICE: vector VEC(me m_ref_p,base) index domain error, in create_vop_ref_mapping_loop at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:1519

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 17:37 --- Sounds like stage2 is miscompiled then. Can you try the preprocessed source with the stage1 compiler and the same flags? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37299

[Bug debug/37300] [4.4 Regression] -g causes internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 17:24 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37287 *** -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug debug/37287] [4.4 Regression] ICE (segfault) with new debugging patch

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 17:24 --- *** Bug 37300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug debug/37300] [4.4 Regression] -g causes internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

-- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.4.0 Summary|-g causes internal compiler |[4.4 Regression] -g

[Bug debug/37300] -g causes internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-08-31 17:11 --- Created an attachment (id=16175) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16175&action=view) testcase to reproduce: gfortran -g -ffree-form f77_blas_extra.F f77_blas_generic.F f77_blas_poison.F f77_blas.F

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] Bootstrap failure due to __muldi3

--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 17:11 --- > Vlad, caused by the IRA merge? Yes, see my message on [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I cannot reproduce it anymore today (r139820) on Linux, can you on FreeBSD? -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug debug/37300] New: -g causes internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

since about two 2 days I observe the following ICE compiling CP2K with -g gfortran -g -ffree-form f77_blas_extra.F f77_blas_generic.F f77_blas_poison.F f77_blas.F f77_blas.F:21: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Se

[Bug tree-optimization/37299] New: libgcc2.c:806: ICE: vector VEC(me m_ref_p,base) index domain error, in create_vop_ref_mapping_loop at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:1519

libmudflap --with-gmp=/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.4.0 --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20080831 (experimental) [trunk revision 139820] (GCC) Breakpoint 1, tree_ssa_lim () at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c:1519 1519 ref = VEC_index

[Bug libstdc++/37298] New: no output when use wcout and cout, wrong utf16 -> utf8 conversion

Hi! I wrote my first std::wstring program and have found bug in libstdc++! * the exact version of GCC gcc version 4.2.3 (4.2.3-6mnb1) * the system type; Linux Mandriva 2008.1 PowerPack * the options given when GCC was configured/built; ./configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-slib

[Bug c/37271] gcc.dg/pr37186.c doesn't work

--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-31 15:12 --- Fixed. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug c/37271] gcc.dg/pr37186.c doesn't work

--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 37271 Author: paolo Date: Sun Aug 31 15:09:38 2008 New Revision: 139833 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139833 Log: 2008-08-31 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c/3727

[Bug target/19115] long double should be changed over to 128bit by default

--- Comment #9 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 14:36 --- This default was changed for GCC targeted at AIX 6.1. -- dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/37289] [4.4 Regression] ICE after non-trivial conversion at assignment

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 14:21 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/37289] [4.4 Regression] ICE after non-trivial conversion at assignment

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 13:40 --- Subject: Bug 37289 Author: rguenth Date: Sun Aug 31 13:39:26 2008 New Revision: 139831 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139831 Log: 2008-08-31 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug middle-end/20283] optimising muldiv() type operations

--- Comment #5 from ajrobb at bigfoot dot com 2008-08-31 13:40 --- For the case where the overall scale is between 1 and 2 (exclusive), it is straightforward to implement a solution with a single multiply and no shifts: /* Demostrate fast multiply and divide by rational number, r, where

[Bug target/37168] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2615 (altivec)

--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 13:12 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/37287] [4.4 Regression] ICE (segfault) with new debugging patch

--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 13:12 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] Bootstrap failure due to __muldi3

--- Comment #2 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2008-08-31 12:46 --- Vlad, caused by the IRA merge? -- gerald at pfeifer dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/33424] segmentation fault for legal code with -O2

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 12:27 --- We endlessly recurse in cse_cc_succs on i686-pc-linux-gnu with -O3. Related to PR36635. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/37168] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2615 (altivec)

--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 12:27 --- Subject: Bug 37168 Author: jakub Date: Sun Aug 31 12:26:20 2008 New Revision: 139829 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139829 Log: PR target/37168 * config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h (

[Bug target/37290] [4.4 Regression] Endless recursion in cse_cc_succs

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 12:26 --- Confirmed. We endlessly recurse in cse_cc_succs. Probably a dup of PR36635, also related to PR33424 (same stuff). -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Add

[Bug target/37168] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2615 (altivec)

--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 12:09 --- Subject: Bug 37168 Author: jakub Date: Sun Aug 31 12:08:35 2008 New Revision: 139828 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139828 Log: PR target/37168 * config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h (

[Bug middle-end/37285] [4.4 Regression] ICE while building binutils on ppc

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 11:59 --- The code in purge_dead_edges looks broken. /* If we don't see a jump insn, we don't know exactly why the block would have been broken at this point. Look for a simple, non-fallthru edge, as these are on

[Bug debug/37287] [4.4 Regression] ICE (segfault) with new debugging patch

--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 11:24 --- Subject: Bug 37287 Author: jakub Date: Sun Aug 31 11:23:04 2008 New Revision: 139826 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139826 Log: PR debug/37287 * dwarf2out.c (gen_namespace_die):

[Bug middle-end/37289] [4.4 Regression] ICE after non-trivial conversion at assignment

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 11:22 --- I have a patch. t.i: In function 'g': t.i:4: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment long unsigned int long int D.1235 = -x; -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/37297] New: Ambiguity check for F2003 GENERIC bindings is not yet fully conformant

In the current implementation of GENERIC type-bound procedures the check if two specific targets of a GENERIC binding could be ambiguous (see standard 16.2.3 Restrictions on generic declarations) is not conformant with this section as it does not handle passed-objects at the moment. The following

[Bug middle-end/37293] [4.4 Regression] r139762 breaks libstdc++ build on darwin

--- Comment #11 from jh at suse dot cz 2008-08-31 09:38 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] r139762 breaks libstdc++ build on darwin > > I will see what I can do about this issue. Mostly we need to look at > where we change from weak to non weak and then fix up those call > statemen

[Bug libfortran/37294] Namelist I/O to array character internal units

--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 09:11 --- "9.3 Internal files" "(2) A record of an internal file is a scalar character variable." "(3) If the file is a scalar character variable, it consists of a single record whose length is the same as the length of the sca

[Bug middle-end/20283] optimising muldiv() type operations

--- Comment #4 from ajrobb at bigfoot dot com 2008-08-31 07:48 --- I should point out that for operations (x * y / z) where y > z, there is nothing to be gained on an Intel Core 2 duo (as extra adds and a shrd are required for the scaling to work over the whole domain: 0..(1<<32)/y. Howe