--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 10:38 ---
What we want to do about this?
Anyway, P2 is probably is too high severity. This obviously doesn't have a high
priority. And I would argue that this is probably not a regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
--- Comment #13 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 10:18 ---
As a Java maintainer I'm happy to have a look at this, but I have no access to
HP/UX hardware.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 09:55
---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassign
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 09:49 ---
Updated patch with also target-supports posted.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
$ cat test.cpp
#include
$ g++ -c -isystem /usr/include test.cpp
In file included from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/4.3/cstdlib:73:25: error: stdlib.h: No such file or directory
...
This happens on two different system with 4.3.1 and 4.3.2.
See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2008-10/msg00338
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 09:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=16615)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16615&action=view)
gcc44-pr37812.patch
Ah, I see, it is a testsuite bug then. altivec_check.h uses the lvlx insns
inside of inline
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 08:48 ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known t
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 08:43 ---
Subject: Bug 37858
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 3 08:42:10 2008
New Revision: 141545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141545
Log:
PR middle-end/37858
* passes.c (execute_one_pass)
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-11-03 08:21 ---
> Isn't this just a user error though?
I am just running the tests.
> Are you configuring gcc with a cell arch eventhough your assembler lacks
> that support?
I use:
../gcc-4.4-work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/g
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 08:14 ---
Isn't this just a user error though?
I mean, for -mavx we also need an assembler that supports AVX instructions,
we don't have a workaround for every AVX instruction. Even if you build with
-march=native on SSSE3 capa
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo