--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-20 07:43 ---
Subject: Re: Matrix.c from pymol 1.1r2 fails to compile with -O2 -fgraphite
> --- Comment #4 from hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 18:20
> ---
> Created an attachment (id=16946)
--> (http://gcc.gn
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-12-20
03:18 ---
I can confirm that current (r142846) gcc trunk, with the changes from r142728,
r142722 and proposed patch in Comment 4 applied, builds pymol 1.1r2 completely
under either -O3 or -O2 and -fgraphite-identity
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-20 00:26
---
This might have been implemented for 4.4 already. Section anchors now have
been enabled for ARM.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9703
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 23:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=16949)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16949&action=view)
a not quite patch for the PR
I'm down to one regression now - the last test of char_length_7.f90.
Pah! That was
--- Comment #7 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-12-19
23:32 ---
The approved patch doesn't seem to be checked into gcc trunk yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38500
--- Comment #5 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-12-19 23:30 ---
Eric, thanks for analysis. It saved a lot of my time.
The problem was in wrong final live ranges of a379r452 therefore the conflicts
was not recognized and the pseudos were coalesced. One pseudo is a temporary
pseudo
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 23:11
---
I'm adding Kai to the CC list. As he's now maintainer, he may want to help
here.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-12-19
23:01 ---
Patch for this was submitted 4 months ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01143.html
Danny
--
dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2008-12-19
22:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=16948)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16948&action=view)
preprocessed file to demonstrate the problem
The "slightly modified" version of dllexport-MI1.C (reall
When building qt-3.3.8 and wxGTk on Tru64 UNIX 5.1
(alphaev67-dec-osf5.1) with gcc-4.2.4, we got linker failures about
duplicate non-virtual thunks, e.g. from qt:
/usr/ccs/bin/ld:
.obj/release-shared-mt/qmotifdnd_x11.o: non-virtual thunk to
QDragMoveEvent::~QDragMoveEvent(): multiply defined
.obj/r
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 20:05 ---
With COMPOUND_EXPR, finish_decltype_type doesn't ICE, but as you note, probably
doesn't do the right thing.
Say on:
struct A
{
static A *bar ();
};
struct B : public A
{
static int baz ();
};
template
void foo
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 19:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=16947)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16947&action=view)
final patch
This was the final patch; it wasn't submitted to gcc-patches, but was written
based on a suggestion f
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 19:34 ---
Subject: Bug 38577
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 19 19:33:28 2008
New Revision: 142842
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142842
Log:
PR c++/38577
* call.c (build_new_method_call): H
--- Comment #38 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 18:22 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: janis
Date: Fri Dec 19 18:20:41 2008
New Revision: 142841
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142841
Log:
Revert:
2008-12-12 Janis Johnson
PR l
--- Comment #4 from hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 18:20
---
Created an attachment (id=16946)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16946&action=view)
Fixed changes suggested by Sebastian Pop.
2008-12-19 Harsha Jagasia
PR tree-optimization/38510
--- Comment #37 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 18:14 ---
Subject: Bug 24685
Author: janis
Date: Fri Dec 19 18:12:40 2008
New Revision: 142840
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142840
Log:
Revert:
2008-12-12 Janis Johnson
PR l
Bootstraping on i586-pc-mingw32 (with mingw-3.15.1, the latest version) is
broken by:
(SHLIB_LINK='ln -s -f @shlib_map_file@ @shlib_map_f...@.def && if [ ! -d
@multilib_dir@/shlib ]; then mkdir @multilib_dir@/shlib else true; fi &&
/home/FX/gfortran/ibin/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/FX/gfortran/ibin/./gcc/
--- Comment #36 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 17:50 ---
I'll revert the patch that changes the XFAIL. I noticed yesterday that the
test was failing on powerpc64-linux on a distribution that I hadn't tested on
before, although the new XFAIL had worked on the other distribu
--- Comment #2 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 17:33
---
Fixed
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #1 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 17:32
---
Subject: Bug 38548
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Dec 19 17:31:12 2008
New Revision: 142838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142838
Log:
PR target/38548
* arm/t-linux (LIB1ASMFUNC
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from jason at redhat dot com 2008-12-19 17:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected call_expr,
have compound_expr in build_new_method_call, at cp/call.c:6000
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Another alternative would be not to create the COMPO
--- Comment #4 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 17:25
---
Fixed
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #3 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 17:24
---
Subject: Bug 38578
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Dec 19 17:22:58 2008
New Revision: 142837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142837
Log:
PR bootstrap/38578
* arm.c (load_multiple_
--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 17:20
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Many thanks, Dominique! At least I have something to work on. It's a cursed
> nuisance not having access to a fully functioning system, when I have time to
> work on gfortran. I think th
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 17:02 ---
The code in question is
if test -f $gcc_cv_binutils_srcdir/configure.in \
&& test -f ../binutils/Makefile \
&& test x$build = x$host; then
gcc_cv_nm=../binutils/nm-new$build_exeext
elif test -x nm$bu
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 16:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=16945)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16945&action=view)
gcc44-pr38577.patch
Patch I'm going to test.
Both the COMPOUND_EXPR and NOP_EXPR are inserted again during insta
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38577
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC build tri
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 16:09 ---
In build_new_method_call, call at that spot is either error_mark_node (already
checked for), build_over_call returned value (can be a CALL_EXPR or
INDIRECT_REF
on a CALL_EXPR for references; both are handled already),
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 15:56 ---
Caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142054
(PR37540).
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 15:23 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct A
{
static A *bar () { return a; }
static A *a;
};
struct B : public A
{
static void baz ();
};
template
void foo ()
{
(static_cast (A::bar ()))->baz ();
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 15:01 ---
Fixed for 4.4.0.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 14:59 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #22 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 15:02 ---
1) doesn't exist on the trunk, 2) fixed there.
Both 1) and 2) need still fixing on 4.3 branch, a backport of
r142834 should cure 2), 1) needs a separate patch.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #9 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 15:01 ---
Subject: Bug 26048
Author: ro
Date: Fri Dec 19 14:59:42 2008
New Revision: 142835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142835
Log:
PR libffi/26048
* configure.ac (HAVE_AS_X86_PCREL): New
--- Comment #21 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 14:58 ---
Subject: Bug 38396
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 19 14:57:29 2008
New Revision: 142834
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142834
Log:
PR libgcj/38396
* configure.ac (use_libgcj_bc):
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 14:57 ---
Subject: Bug 37739
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 19 14:55:42 2008
New Revision: 142833
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142833
Log:
PR bootstrap/37739
* config.host: For powerpc*-*
--- Comment #18 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 14:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=16944)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16944&action=view)
gcc44-pr38245.patch
On x86_64 some more work is needed, because in leaf functions parts of the
outgoing_args_siz
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-12-19
14:04 ---
I noticed today that r142822 no longer exhibited the failure of
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/ios_base/storage/2.cc as...
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: 27_io/ios_base/storage/2.cc execution test
at -m6
The code below compiles, but it should give an error, because the Policy ctor
is not accessible when inheriting protected from Policy
To have valid C++ code the inheritance must be public.
struct Policy
{
protected:
Policy() {}
Policy(const Policy&) {}
};
template
struct BugGcc
--- Comment #4 from bero at arklinux dot org 2008-12-19 12:25 ---
Looks like bugzilla doesn't handle attachments > 128 kB...
I've uploaded the file to http://arklinux.org/~bero/formpreviewview.ii.gz
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38577
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-12-19 12:02 ---
Thanks!
The cfarm machine gcc50 has a 600 Mhz XScale-80219 with 512 MB of RAM,
gcc-4.3.2 release C only bootstrap took 17 hours (and about the same for make
check) - feel free to ask for an account if it's faster than wh
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 12:01 ---
The attachment is corrupted, you've only attached first 128KB of the *.gz file.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38577
--- Comment #67 from chris at bubblescope dot net 2008-12-19 11:45 ---
Sorry to come back to this again. With C++0x just around the corner, is there
any chance of getting this fixed, seeing as I expect this should be the
standard way of checking if we are in conforming C++0x mode, when i
--- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 10:41 ---
Better testcase:
/* PR rtl-optimization/38245 */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
extern int bar (long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long,
long, long, long, long, long, long, long
--- Comment #1 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 10:22
---
I'm already testing fixes for this, but my native arm board is very
sl
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
At rev 142808 on trunk:
../trunk/configure --prefix=/n/50/guerby/install-trunk-142808
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls
--enable-threads=posix --with-mpfr=/opt/cfarm/mpfr-2.3.2
--build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi
...
make boostra
--- Comment #1 from bero at arklinux dot org 2008-12-19 10:03 ---
The ICE occurs even at -O0
--
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
--- Comment #2 from bero at arklinux dot org 2008-12-19 10:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=16943)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16943&action=view)
gzipped preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38577
g++ -c -m64 -pipe -fPIC -g -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/pgsql
-I/usr/include/pgsql/server -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0
-I/usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -m64 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fweb
-frename-registers -D_REENTRANT -Wall -W -DQT_NO_CAST_FROM_ASCII
-DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-19 09:50 ---
Given the sorry state of tree DSE (what we have is a joke), it is actually
trivial to come up with testcases for arbitrary pure/const call elimination
during RTL DCE. E.g.
/* PR rtl-optimization/38245 */
/* { dg-do r
53 matches
Mail list logo
