--- Comment #5 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 17:59 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Could you elaborate? Did you mean a wrong tar for creating a tarball?
No, he said untar.
I just downloaded the file from that mirror and it matches its md5 sum,
extracts without errors, and
--- Comment #31 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-10-05
18:05 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
It is unclear what those labels are good for, but if darwin is to support
hot/cold partitioning and FDEs covering it, the emit unwind_label hook (which
is apparently darwin
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-10-05 17:59
---
Fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #6 from davine at poczta dot onet dot pl 2009-10-05 18:08
---
Wouldn't you consider it strange that a wrong md5 would only cause a renaming
of 2 files and no real corruption? (the build was successful) If anything it
must be something with my tar, perhaps it's too old?
../trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,lto --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls
--enable-threads=posix --with-mpfr=/opt/cfarm/mpfr-2.4.1/
--with-gmp=/opt/cfarm/gmp-4.2.4/ --prefix=/n/16/guerby/install-trunk
--with-libelf=/opt/cfarm/libelf-0.8.12
...
checking for the correct version of libelf...
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 18:45 ---
Before:
t.c:4:35
After:
t.c:4:7
This is on the compound_expr's operand 1 which is eq_expr.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41451
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 18:55 ---
This was caused by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=149722
tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type,
fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (op0),
--- Comment #12 from kirill at shutemov dot name 2009-10-05 19:34 ---
Yes, it works.
Thanks.
--
kirill at shutemov dot name changed:
What|Removed |Added
although the option is parsed by g++spec.c it is not accepted by gcc.
--
Summary: -static-libstdc++ is not recognized as valid by the gcc
driver.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-10-05
19:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=18713)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18713action=view)
recognize -static-libstdc++ as a valid option
log:
*gcc/gcc.c: Add -static-libstdc++ to
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-10-05 19:46 ---
Subject: Re: Misnamed hpp files in gcc-4.4.1.tar.bz2
from ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, davine at poczta dot onet dot pl wrote:
of 2 files and no real corruption? (the build was successful) If
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 19:51 ---
Subject: Bug 41558
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 5 19:50:57 2009
New Revision: 152467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152467
Log:
PR debug/41558
* dwarf2out.c (loc_by_reference):
Originally (radar: 5202926)
we need to make objective c internal labels local. At present the name-mangled
ones are not recognized.
--
Summary: object-c++ mangled local labels are not correctly
recognized.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-10-05
20:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=18714)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18714action=view)
recognize name-mangled obj-c++ internal symbols.
this is modeled on the mechanism of the fix for
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 20:06 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 20:09 ---
The warning is gone but the issue still exist.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 20:16 ---
This is fixed on the trunk
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
The recognition of any library-related option in g++-spec.c causes the
insertion of -lstdc++. This causes link to be invoked when trying to
generate PCH, which then fails. This bit me when trying to run the testsuite
with /-static-libstdc++
The behavior here appears to differ from gcc where
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-10-05
20:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=18715)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18715action=view)
allow specification of -static-libstdc++ on the CL while generating PCH
this patch alters the
--- Comment #32 from mrs at apple dot com 2009-10-05 20:55 ---
I suspect the other case is simply:
if (flag_exceptions)
flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition = 0;
be added, just like the code for flag_unwind_tables. I suspect this, as the
testcase is *.C.
--
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-10-05 21:15 ---
Not set for gnat1 (Ada):
(gdb) b gate_lto_out
Breakpoint 1 at 0xedd700: file ../../trunk/gcc/lto-streamer.c, line 803.
(gdb) r -quiet -dumpbase p.adb -auxbase p -O3 -flto -mtune=generic p.adb -o
/tmp/cclbAgyw.s
--- Comment #33 from mrs at apple dot com 2009-10-05 21:16 ---
I'm fine with the latest patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41313
--- Comment #2 from mrs at apple dot com 2009-10-05 21:21 ---
Ok.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41595
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 21:16 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02102.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41554
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 21:39 ---
This works for me on the trunk. At least on x86_64-linux-gnu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41559
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 21:41 ---
Fixed in 4.5.0 so closing as fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41240
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41239
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 21:46 ---
***
mudflap violation 1 (check/write): time=1254779079.565574 ptr=0x7fffe830
size=8
pc=0x2abccec1 location=`t.cc:3:37 (desc::desc)'
/home/pinskia/local-gcc/lib64/libmudflap.so.0(__mf_check+0x41)
--- Comment #1 from sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr 2009-10-05
21:51 ---
Same situation as of today's trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39863
--- Comment #1 from sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr 2009-10-05
21:52 ---
Problem still present as of today's trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39866
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 22:07 ---
I just was able to compile this using the lto branch as the starting GCC since
that was the newest powerpc-linux-gnu build I had.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41491
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41205
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
-
O2 -flto -w -c -o 2105-1.o
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/c
ompile/2105-1.c(timeout = 300)
/var/tmp//cc74uIsZ.s: Assembler messages:
/var/tmp//cc74uIsZ.s:105: Error: bad or irreducible
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-10-05 22:22
---
Let's CC Jason...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-10-05 22:22
---
Likewise...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 22:22 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major
To reproduce with the delta reduced test
cc1 dwarf2out.i -quiet -O2 -flto -o dwarf2out.s
as -V -Qy -o dwarf2out.o dwarf2out.s
cc1 c-decl.i -quiet -O2 -flto -o c-decl.s
as -V -Qy -o c-decl.o c-decl.s
lto1 -quiet -O2 c-decl.o dwarf2out.o -o /dev/null
Produces:
--- Comment #1 from espindola at google dot com 2009-10-05 23:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=18716)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18716action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41598
--- Comment #2 from espindola at google dot com 2009-10-05 23:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=18717)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18717action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41598
--- Comment #34 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-10-05
23:25 ---
Actually, I just noticed that with the latest patch we still fail...
gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c
Executing on host:
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc45-4.4.999-20091003/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41545
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-10-06 00:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: Bad .comm directive
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
The directive is:
.comm gnu_lto_v1,1,1
This apparently comes from here:
/* Emit LTO marker if
--- Comment #3 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-10-06 00:51
---
Now I'm getting comparison errors with
[trunk revision 152459]
and the same configuration:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap
--- Comment #35 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-10-06
00:51 ---
Testing...
Index: gcc/config/darwin.c
===
--- gcc/config/darwin.c (revision 152480)
+++ gcc/config/darwin.c (working copy)
@@ -1454,7
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-06 01:54 ---
Neither -O3 or __attribute__((always_inline)) work. There are four
instances of \\(DIE \\(.*?\\) DW_TAG_lexical_block and \\(DIE \\(.*?\\)
DW_TAG_lexical_block in the assembly output. Reviewing the assembler,
all
--- Comment #36 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-10-06
02:02 ---
This can be factored down to...
Index: gcc/config/darwin.c
===
--- gcc/config/darwin.c (revision 152481)
+++ gcc/config/darwin.c (working
--- Comment #37 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-10-06
02:05 ---
Opps. In both of the last patch...
+ if ((darwin_macosx_version_min strverscmp(darwin_macosx_version_min,
10.6) = 0) || flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition)
should be
+ if (!(darwin_macosx_version_min
--- Comment #8 from davine at poczta dot onet dot pl 2009-10-06 02:13
---
Thanks and sorry for the false alarm...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41592
--- Comment #38 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-10-06
02:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=18718)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18718action=view)
patch to handle unwind label and -freorder-blocks-and-partition control in
darwin.c
--
howarth at
--- Comment #39 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-10-06
02:19 ---
Mike,
Does darwin have named sections? If so, we can drop the check on
!targetm.have_named_sections.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41313
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-06 03:08
---
Subject: Bug 35862
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Oct 6 03:08:20 2009
New Revision: 152483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152483
Log:
2009-10-05 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-06 03:12
---
Subject: Bug 35862
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Oct 6 03:12:21 2009
New Revision: 152484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152484
Log:
2009-10-05 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-06 04:25 ---
The patch that introduces debug temps fixes this bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg00112.html
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-06 04:38 ---
This patch fixes the problem:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg00112.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41343
--- Comment #6 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-06 04:38 ---
The patch that introduces debug temps fixes this problem:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg00112.html
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
101 - 156 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
