http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46125
Wei Li liwei79 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
Summary: TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES for SPARC V8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46209
Summary: pmovmskb, useless sign extension
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46209
tbp tbptbp at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46043
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
08:50:07 UTC ---
This should be suspended, the C++0x mechanisms are not finalised (pun intended)
and might become keywords rather than attributes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46153
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21917
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
09:17:23 UTC ---
I've relied on exactly this behaviour and wouldn't want a warning.
struct Base : virtual std::ios {
Base() : std::ios(0) { }
std::streambuf buf;
};
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45494
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-28
09:36:02 UTC ---
This pr seems to be fixed by revision 166018:
[macbook] f90/bug% gfc pr45494.f90
pr45494.f90:43.16:
call src%mold(trg2) ! This is wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-10-28
09:50:37 UTC ---
Note, we have a much more general issue with atomic_Tp* vs atomic_address:
everywhere we are assuming _Tp is not cv-qualified and this is not going to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
09:54:24 UTC ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#879
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-10-28
09:59:43 UTC ---
Thanks Jon, much better implementing it ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
11:02:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 22188
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22188
Minimal patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
11:11:09 UTC ---
I haven't followed it, but it wouldn't surprise me if a few issues were closed
as NAD Editorial without actually being fixed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45494
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46210
Summary: segfault when using large arrays with -fopenmp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46210
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Werner Boschmann boschmann at tp1 dot
physik.uni-siegen.de 2010-10-28 12:23:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Sorry, I was to quick. The reason is already given in the valgrind output. The
stack size is to small. So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-10-28
12:34:52 UTC ---
Thanks Dodji for working on this. Please remember to resolve PR46162 too (very
likely a duplicate) while you are at it...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-28
13:10:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22189
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22189
preprocessed source file for gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18_x.c at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46210
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46211
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c compilation
on powerpc-*-*
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46131
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46131
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
14:44:54 UTC ---
paolo.carlini at oracle dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes:
Thanks Dodji for working on this. Please remember to resolve PR46162
too (very likely a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22180|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greg.r.rogers at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46162
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-10-28
14:49:30 UTC ---
Excellent. Thanks again!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179
--- Comment #6 from Finn Thain fthain at telegraphics dot com.au 2010-10-28
15:21:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 22191
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22191
possible fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45494
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 15:32:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
With the patch in comment #2, several of my codelets are rejected: for
instance
the test in comment #24 of pr42274 is rejected with:
[macbook]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179
--- Comment #7 from Finn Thain fthain at telegraphics dot com.au 2010-10-28
15:34:06 UTC ---
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote:
This should habe [sic] been fixed up by m68k_final_prescan_insn.
(In reply to comment #4)
The invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44436
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-28 16:01:11 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 28 16:01:05 2010
New Revision: 166030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166030
Log:
2010-10-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-28 16:05:44
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 163383:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00595.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
17:21:03 UTC ---
(N.B. this now gets the bogus warning from PR 46159)
Grammatically:
new (pure (*[3]));
is a new-expression, with type-id pure(*[3])
that type-id has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
17:30:28 UTC ---
It doesn't depend on abstract types, this fails, even though it should be able
to declare an array of pure* without seeing the definition of pure:
struct
: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rmansfi...@qnx.com
$ ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101028 (experimental) [trunk revision 166029
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2010-10-28
17:37:25 UTC ---
Working on reducing the testcase. I originally encountered the ICE as:
internal compiler error: vector VEC(reg_stat_type,base) index domain error, in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46034
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46153
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 17:45:57 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Oct 28 17:45:52 2010
New Revision: 166031
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166031
Log:
PR target/46153
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46203
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
17:46:29 UTC ---
Only with --disable-checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa*-*-* (32-bit) |hppa*-*-* (32-bit),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-28
18:12:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02414.html
The gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45402
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
Summary: [4.6 Regression]
gfortran.dg/aliasing_array_result_1.f90 ICE: in
vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4046 with
custom compiler flags
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2010-10-28
18:45:10 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
static __inline__ unsigned foo(void *__ptr) {
unsigned __val = *(volatile unsigned *)(__ptr);
return (((__val) 24) | (((__val) 8)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200
davidxl davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46214
Summary: internal compiler error: in redirect_eh_edge_1, at
tree-eh.c:2135
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-28
19:11:46 UTC ---
The test was introduced at revision 161550 along a patch fixing pr44582.
Note that before this revision the test compiles with the flags, but abort at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46214
--- Comment #1 from Steve Talmage steve_talmage at yahoo dot com 2010-10-28
19:13:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 22193
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22193
.ii file from -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45214
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45270
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46215
Summary: ICE: verify_stmts failed: type mismatch in comparison
expression with -fstrict-overflow -fno-tree-ch
-ftree-loop-linear
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45274
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43170
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45285
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216
Summary: ice: SSA corruption
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45431
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45219
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28
20:26:24 UTC ---
This works with
GNU C (GCC) version 4.6.0 20101026 (experimental) [trunk revision 165988]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45219
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-10-28 20:36:20
UTC ---
It seems to have disappeared between r163636 and r165699. Both original and
reduced testcase stopped crashing between those revisions.
4.5 r165781 doesn't crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45509
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45522
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46153
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 20:49:56 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Oct 28 20:49:46 2010
New Revision: 166047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166047
Log:
Partially revert:
2010-10-28 Uros
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
Summary: [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45591
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-28
21:06:36 UTC ---
Maybe you could check if there are any 'false alarm' errors among that ...
I'll do it. Meanwhile I am puzzled by the patch. My understanding of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46218
Summary: TARGET_PREFERRED_OUTPUT_RELOAD_CLASS is not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
Paul Koning ni1d at arrl dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ni1d at arrl dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43168
Paul Koning ni1d at arrl dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ni1d at arrl dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45219
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-28 22:39:39
UTC ---
It was fixed by revision 163775:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00066.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46219
Summary: Generate indirect jump instruction on x86-64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46219
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
Summary: Error: invalid covariant return type generated for
incomplete class type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41822
Paul Koning pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-29
00:45:26 UTC ---
It certainly is a covariant return type, it meets the criteria in all three
bullet points of 10.3 [class.virtual] p5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-29
00:50:53 UTC ---
However p6 says
If the return type of D::f differs from the return type of B::f, the class type
in the return type of D::f shall be complete at the point of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46211
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2010-10-29 03:13:01
UTC ---
When I look at the source code for the test I don't see how this could possibly
happen. The whole test is suppressed on powerpc systems.
Would you be able to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Summary: huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so
alias missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 05:38:59
UTC ---
Created attachment 22197
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22197
locale-inst.s 20101028
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 05:40:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 22198
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22198
locale-inst.s 20101014
100 matches
Mail list logo