http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
08:43:32 UTC ---
BTW, if you adjust the testcase (at least not to use explicit DImode type), I'd
say this patch is obvious, thunks never take addresses of its parameters and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
Summary: stable_sort problem with C++0x and comparator by value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48039
Summary: Legal program rejected, a formal function is not
visible in generic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-09 09:21:46 UTC ---
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
09:30:17 UTC ---
I will analyse this properly asap, but there are a few things that look odd in
your example. Why does your move assignment do a swap not a move?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-03-09 09:40:33 UTC ---
Thanks for the quick answer.
On 9 Mar, 2011, at 10:30 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
09:42:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
#ifdef BYVALUE
inline bool operator(V rh, V lh) {
#else
inline bool operator(V const rh, V const lh) {
#endif
return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
09:47:33 UTC ---
replacing the swap in the move assignment doesn't change anything, so ignore my
comment on that, still looking...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48040
Summary: .pushsection causes bogus debug records when options
-O2 -g are used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48040
--- Comment #1 from rwhitton at bluearc dot com 2011-03-09 09:54:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23591
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23591
This is the original non preprocessed source code of the test program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48041
Summary: dwarf2out emits unnecessary null byte in empty
.debug_abbrev section
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48040
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48037
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
10:24:42 UTC ---
slightly reduced ...
#include vector
#include iostream
#includealgorithm
typedef std::vectordouble VI;
struct V {
VI v;
V(){std::cout dc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47779
--- Comment #1 from Stu Stuart.Henderson at analog dot com 2011-03-09
10:45:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 23592
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23592
first attempt to fix bug #47779
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47779
--- Comment #2 from Stu Stuart.Henderson at analog dot com 2011-03-09
10:47:33 UTC ---
oops, missed the comment field, sorry.
To get the ball rolling, this is a first attempt to fix the bug. Taking Ian
Lance Taylor's advice:
I doubt there is a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chris at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
11:18:09 UTC ---
N.B. that last testcase still fails if operator takes its arguments by
reference, the problem is not caused by taking the args by value, that just
made it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
Summary: lto segfaults while building Qt 4.7.2 with -g -flto
-fwhole-program
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #9 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2011-03-09
11:28:13 UTC ---
Just to say, I am looking at this. Thanks for the small test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
11:29:22 UTC ---
Of course we already have testcases using the checked __gnu_test::rvalstruct.
We should figure out first what's special here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
11:30:06 UTC ---
Thanks a lot Chris, it would be nice if we could resolve it in time for 4.6.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #12 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-03-09 11:39:24 UTC ---
On 9 Mar, 2011, at 12:30 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #11 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
11:43:00 UTC ---
gah - there was a bug in my reduced testcase, the move assignment operator
should have done:
ok = rh.ok;
that was missing which is why Temporary_buffer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #14 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2011-03-09
11:51:24 UTC ---
Ah yes, I see the problem now.
The problem is to do with using move_iterator. When we compare two values which
we dereference from a move_iterator,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
11:55:05 UTC ---
hum, if that is confirmed, we should also quickly audit the other uses of
move_iterator as implementation detail, we have a few, not many.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48037
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
12:02:34 UTC ---
I have posted the patch (with the simpler testcase, thanks) to the
mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00461.html
If there are no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
Summary: pr47201: var-tracking loc_order_check fails for type
punning examples
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
12:04:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 23594
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23594
pr47201.i.212r.alignments
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in
function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:875
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48044
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-*-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48043
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
12:41:11 UTC ---
Unless Patrick has reduced the test case, the only way I was able to reproduce
it was to build the entire Glob2 benchmark which he mentions. It has lots of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
12:46:07 UTC ---
By the way, as a note to Vincenzo, in general I don't really see the point of
comparators taking the arguments by value, thus ruling out move-only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
12:46:12 UTC ---
I think this started with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138355
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Erik Schnetter schnetter at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Erik Schnetter schnetter at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30952
--- Comment #2 from Erik Schnetter schnetter at gmail dot com 2011-03-09
12:56:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 23596
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23596
failing source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30952
Erik Schnetter schnetter at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23596|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Erik Schnetter schnetter at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23398|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
--- Comment #2 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-03-09 12:58:58 UTC ---
Somewhat reduced, still too large:
$ g++ -m64 -O2 -g -flto -o ../../../bin/uic3
.obj/release-static-emb-x86_64/widgetinfo.o -L/usr/src/ark/BUILD/qt/lib
-lQt3Support
lto1:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
--- Comment #3 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-03-09 13:19:53 UTC ---
If I reduce widgetinfo.cpp to just say
#include q3glist.h
it still breaks and produces a different, potentially more useful error:
In file included from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
13:27:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
$ /Users/eschnett/gcc/bin/g++ -fopenmp -Wall -g3 -m128bit-long-double
-march=native -std=gnu++0x -fbounds-check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
--- Comment #4 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-03-09 13:27:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 23598
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23598
Preprocessed source of remaining widgetinfo.cpp
Preprocessed source of remaining
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
13:31:13 UTC ---
Would be interesting to know if it also happens without -fwhole-program
(I am assuming you either use the gold or GNU ld linker-plugin).
You can also try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #17 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2011-03-09
13:34:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 23599
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23599
Patch to make stable_sort work with comparitors that take by value.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #18 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2011-03-09
13:34:51 UTC ---
Just to update:
I have checked other users of MOVE_ITERATOR (there are only two) and they
appear fine, as they do not use a comparator.
Attached is an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #19 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2011-03-09
13:35:48 UTC ---
Ignore that patch, there is a problem with it (tester wasn't working properly).
Sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45044
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #37 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
13:41:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
TO BE DONE: The HP-UX (et al.?) compile warning regarding the _r functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45045
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #53 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-03-09 13:46:39 UTC ---
Building fails with GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.21.51.0.7.20110306:
c++ -o xpcshell -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wpointer-arith
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Erik Schnetter schnetter at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23597|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48045
Summary: dwarf2out emits CU with DW_AT_stmt_list to empty line
table
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
14:05:35 UTC ---
template typename T
struct typeprops {
typedef T complex;
typedef T real;
};
namespace good {
template typename T
inline typename
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-03-09 14:11:36
UTC ---
I have the exact same glibc and kernel versions on FC14, and I don't see it.
Can you attach your executable and your core dump?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
14:14:08 UTC ---
that was reduced using the most recent snapshot not HEAD of trunk, so apologies
if it doesn't fail with an up-to-date build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
14:40:48 UTC ---
I can confirm the ICE with r170818.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #54 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-03-09 14:40:25 UTC ---
Turned out that GNU ld doesn't like --as-needed;
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--no-keep-memory works fine.
(although GNU ld uses way more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] Expected diagnostic reference to
'type' is ambiguous not given for function-local
static declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16427
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
14:56:26 UTC ---
Related to this is
struct X { int i; int j; int k; };
void foo (void)
{
struct X a, b;
__builtin_memcpy (a, b, 4);
}
where we are unable to DCE the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
--- Comment #6 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-03-09 15:02:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 23601
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23601
stripped down libQt3Support.a
Here's a stripped down version of libQt3Support.a -- linking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-03-09 15:11:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
I have the exact same glibc and kernel versions on FC14, and I don't see it.
Can you attach your executable and your core dump?
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23599|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #21 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-03-09 15:27:49 UTC ---
On 9 Mar, 2011, at 1:46 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #16 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
15:28:55 UTC ---
Great. While I test it locally, can you please prepare a ChangeLog entry? For
sure it's much easier for you to write down which are the new functions,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
15:33:33 UTC ---
Vincenzo no hurry, thankfully Chris has a patch essentially ready (apparently)
and most likely we can fix the problem over the next hours. But in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047
Summary: Incorrect output rounding of double precision numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
15:53:43 UTC ---
Chris, thanks for dealing with this so quickly.
A small nit, in the new testcase I think the move-assignment operator should
use
ok = rh.ok;
instead of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48018
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-09 15:55:06 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-03-09
06:24:43 UTC ---
I'm not sure it matters to the syslog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #25 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
15:55:38 UTC ---
Jon, I'm doing that here, while reformatting a bit the testcases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #26 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2011-03-09
15:58:24 UTC ---
But, the first line of the method (of all the methods) is:
VERIFY(rh.ok);
So, we know it's true. That might still look more consistent/clear.
Very
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #27 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-09
16:00:52 UTC ---
No problem Chris with the trivial formatting, but please spend a minute on the
ChangeLog, if you can. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #28 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-03-09 16:01:33 UTC ---
The use case was sloppy coders (we have hundreds of them, a real resource to
find bugs!)
I personally have no problem with const .
Still I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #29 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net 2011-03-09
16:07:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 23604
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23604
Changelog for stable sort change
Changelog
I've put Jonathan in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48048
Summary: [F2003] Remove constraint on namelist group objects
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48020
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-09 16:09:42 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-03-09
07:09:58 UTC ---
I think that the problem is that the
DW_AT_data_member_location: 0
43 DW_AT_accessibility: 3 (private)
but:
FAIL: g++ (GCC) 4.6.0 20110309 (experimental)
(gdb) ptype C
type = class C {
public:
^^^
int private_;
}
because:
237: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_member)
38 DW_AT_name: (indirect string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23598|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48050
Summary: [c++] ice with c++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46419
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cck0011 at yahoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48036
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|GC |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23605|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48050
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44045
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denis.campredon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48042
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09
16:59:59 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Mar 9 16:59:55 2011
New Revision: 170822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170822
Log:
2011-03-09 Martin
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
