[Bug fortran/48746] Matmul with allocate on assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 jpr at csc dot fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpr at csc dot fi --- Comment #1 from

[Bug libfortran/48785] New: BOZ editing of real numbers not working with -std=f2008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785 Summary: BOZ editing of real numbers not working with -std=f2008 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug libfortran/48785] BOZ editing of real numbers not working with -std=f2008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug c/48742] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal error in gimplify_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 07:04:29 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 27 07:04:25 2011 New Revision: 173011 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173011 Log: PR c/48742 *

[Bug c/48742] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Internal error in gimplify_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 07:05:56 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 27 07:05:54 2011 New Revision: 173012 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173012 Log: PR c/48742 *

[Bug tree-optimization/48765] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48765 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/48786] New: [OOP] Generic ambiguity check too strict for polymorphic dummies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786 Summary: [OOP] Generic ambiguity check too strict for polymorphic dummies Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug c/48742] [4.5 Regression] Internal error in gimplify_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-04-27 07:46:00 UTC --- Hi, this patch is not really tested, I need to construct a testcase that reproduces fo rme, but it adds the mising add_new_function hook and should solve the

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 07:30:36 UTC --- Hi, the problem is that ipa-prop is not really looking for newly inserted functions. So inliner knows about the arguments but asks the ipa-prop machinery that

[Bug target/48673] [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts on IA64.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673 Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel at gcc

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #15 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 07:45:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) Fixed on 4.5. Can it please be fixed in 4.4, too? (Maybe I am wrong, but I see only commits to trunk/4.6 and 4.5

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 08:10:12 UTC --- The patch from 4.5 can likely be ported to 4.4 somewhat easy, however, it is big enough and I am not sure that there will be any more releases off

[Bug libfortran/48787] New: Invalid UP rounding with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787 Summary: Invalid UP rounding with F editing Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo:

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #18 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 08:26:51 UTC --- P.S: Maybe you can backport it anyway, since I opened Gentoo bug #365045 [1]. Having the backport readily available from upstream would probably help including it in a

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #17 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 08:25:13 UTC --- This bug prevents Erlang 14B2 from building on my machine, so for me it is serious. Someone else has to tell whether there will be further 4.4 releases, of course.

[Bug c++/48771] [C++0x] is_literal_type incorrect for references to non-literal types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48771 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] |[4.6 / 4.7

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/44618] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code with -frename-registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at

[Bug c/48783] ARM: kernel compiled at -O2 has a unused reference to __aeabi_uldivmod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783 Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ams at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #15 from Seth Heeren bugs at sehe dot nl 2011-04-27 09:51:26 UTC --- Probably redundant info, but the compiler used in my prior post is sehe@sid:~$ g++-4.6 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++-4.6

[Bug c/48783] ARM: kernel compiled at -O2 has a unused reference to __aeabi_uldivmod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783 --- Comment #2 from Michael Hope michael.hope at linaro dot org 2011-04-27 09:52:09 UTC --- Sorry, the original attachment included the __attribute__((noinline)) workaround on pll_factors(). Attached is the original that shows the fault.

[Bug rtl-optimization/48774] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 optimization regression on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug target/48090] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.2 miscompilation when building on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/48604] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code with -frename-registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 10:04:38 UTC --- Created attachment 24112 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24112 backported patch Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have

[Bug c/48783] ARM: kernel compiled at -O2 has a unused reference to __aeabi_uldivmod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783 --- Comment #3 from Michael Hope michael.hope at linaro dot org 2011-04-27 09:54:56 UTC --- Created attachment 24111 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24111 Preprocessed source

[Bug target/44618] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code with -frename-registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc

[Bug target/44618] Arguments are not passed correctly to out-of-line restore functions.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/48772] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in walk_non_aliased_vuses (gimple.h:1100) with -O -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48772 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 10:36:38 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 27 10:36:35 2011 New Revision: 173019 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173019 Log: 2011-04-27 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/48765] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48765 --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-04-27 10:25:16 UTC --- As analyzed by Richard, the problem (btw, unrelated to Richard's patch) is that the vectorization factor is changed after the analysis for this loop, and the same

[Bug tree-optimization/48772] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in walk_non_aliased_vuses (gimple.h:1100) with -O -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48772 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/48775] gcc.dg/pr48616.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48775 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 09:50:08 UTC --- Possibly Tru64 needs similar handling as hppa*-hpux*?

[Bug fortran/48788] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in resolve_global_procedure (resolve.c:2190) on invalid (?) fortran code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in resolve_global_procedure (resolve.c:2190) on invalid (?) fortran code Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c/48783] ARM: kernel compiled at -O2 has a unused reference to __aeabi_uldivmod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 11:08:10 UTC --- Somewhat reduced testcase: static void f (unsigned int a) { unsigned long long __res; if (~0ULL % (a / (a -a)) == 0) { asm (: +r (__res)); }

[Bug target/48789] missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 --- Comment #3 from Török Edwin edwintorok at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 11:11:02 UTC --- Created attachment 24116 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24116 bench.c

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #21 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 10:56:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) Created attachment 24112 [details] backported patch Thanks! I notified downstream, hopefully they will give it testing through a bump to

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #14 from Seth Heeren bugs at sehe dot nl 2011-04-27 09:48:57 UTC --- I just built a debian SID chroot and applied the diff to it's libstdc++6 (4.6.0-2), and tested your patch with the minimal.cpp from this bug report patch -p1

[Bug target/48789] missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 --- Comment #2 from Török Edwin edwintorok at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 11:10:49 UTC --- Created attachment 24115 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24115 test.S

[Bug target/48789] missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 --- Comment #1 from Török Edwin edwintorok at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 11:10:35 UTC --- Created attachment 24114 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24114 reverse.c

[Bug target/48789] New: missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 Summary: missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/48788] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in resolve_global_procedure (resolve.c:2190) on invalid (?) fortran code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/45383] [4.5 Regression] Implicit conversion to pointer does no longer automatically generate operator== and operator!=.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383 --- Comment #12 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-04-27 11:37:43 UTC --- Dodji, is there any reason not to apply this fix to 4.5 as well? I was waiting to see how the initial fix would behave in 4.6 and it felt below

[Bug c/48790] New: ARM GCC divide/modulo bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48790 Summary: ARM GCC divide/modulo bug Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/42260] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE looking up template conversion operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42260 --- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 12:07:20 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Wed Apr 27 12:07:16 2011 New Revision: 173024 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173024 Log: Revert Fix PR c++/42260

[Bug c++/45383] [4.5 Regression] Implicit conversion to pointer does no longer automatically generate operator== and operator!=.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383 --- Comment #13 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-04-27 12:32:09 UTC --- I have committed those in 4.5 and the changes can be browsed at http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=eb9cc5c6f and

[Bug c/48790] ARM GCC divide/modulo causes Illegal instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48790 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/48774] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 optimization regression on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davidxl at gcc dot

[Bug target/48767] compiler error: Segmentation fault with set void in va_arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/48142] [4.6/4.7 Regression] miscompilation with -Os -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 -fstack-check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 13:08:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) PS: C++1x is private jargon, but well, as -std= argument, together with c++0x we'll need something more realistic, at some point,

[Bug c++/45383] [4.5 Regression] Implicit conversion to pointer does no longer automatically generate operator== and operator!=.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383 --- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 13:09:47 UTC --- *sigh*, 2nd commit while the 4.5 branch is frozen ...

[Bug target/48723] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue() with -fstack-check + function returning struct, on corei7-avx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/48628] ICE in reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-04-27 13:27:50 UTC --- Got it ;)

[Bug middle-end/48791] New: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo:

[Bug libfortran/48511] Implement Steele-White algorithm for numeric output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net 2011-04-27 14:11:10 UTC --- Gay's routines (http://www.netlib.org/fp/) can handle double, float, extended, quad; rounding directions may be specified. They can output a

[Bug middle-end/48791] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/48786] [4.6/4.7 Regression][OOP] Generic ambiguity check too strict for polymorphic dummies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.3 Target

[Bug middle-end/48791] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/48791] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 14:38:01 UTC --- DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node-decl) is NULL for covariant return thunk to AB::getThis()

[Bug middle-end/48791] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 14:41:15 UTC --- #3 0x010e2203 in ipa_add_new_function (node=0x75b90940, data=0x0) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/ipa-prop.c:2068 2068

[Bug libfortran/48511] Implement Steele-White algorithm for numeric output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 14:59:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Gay's routines (http://www.netlib.org/fp/) can handle double, float, extended, quad libquadmath initially used dtoa for __float128

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/48746] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Matmul with allocate on assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 15:07:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #1) Problem here is that the return array dtype field is uninitialized when lhs is (unallocated)

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-27 15:20:32 UTC --- I still can't reproduce the testcase but I guess I can make one myself just by forcing global constructor. Will try to have patch before lunch. I realized last

[Bug target/48792] New: ICE in failed_reload, at reload1.c:6000

-libmudflap --disable-libssp Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110427 (experimental) [trunk revision 173031] (GCC) $ ./xgcc -B. -c -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -O2 t.ii t.ii: In member function 'void icu_46::ValueRecord::adjustPosition(icu_46::ValueFormat, const char

[Bug c++/48046] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Expected diagnostic reference to 'type' is ambiguous not given for function-local static declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 15:56:50 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 27 15:56:46 2011 New Revision: 173036 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173036 Log: PR c++/48046 *

[Bug c++/48046] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Expected diagnostic reference to 'type' is ambiguous not given for function-local static declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 15:57:11 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 27 15:57:06 2011 New Revision: 173038 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173038 Log: PR c++/48046 *

[Bug c++/48046] [4.5 Regression] Expected diagnostic reference to 'type' is ambiguous not given for function-local static declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/48046] [4.5 Regression] Expected diagnostic reference to 'type' is ambiguous not given for function-local static declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-04-27 15:59:01 UTC --- Thanks Jason.

[Bug java/48417] -ffixed-regs option can't work in mips-elf-gcj compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417 --- Comment #3 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 16:03:56 UTC --- GCJjava_main.java Using built-in specs. Target: mips-elf Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.2/configure

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-04-27 16:04:21 UTC --- Hi, I hope the problem is now fixed at mainline tree. Could you please give it a try? Thanks, Honza

[Bug middle-end/43085] Make profiledbootstrap fails with cc1plus catching SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085 Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at

[Bug middle-end/48791] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/43085] Make profiledbootstrap fails with cc1plus catching SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085 --- Comment #23 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 16:28:32 UTC --- Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02131.html

[Bug c++/40975] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in copy_tree_r on array new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/48793] New: Optimization -O2 Incorrectly Removes Logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793 Summary: Optimization -O2 Incorrectly Removes Logic Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug tree-optimization/40052] missed optimizations on (extended) logical types: (x | 1) -- 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40052 Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at use dot net

[Bug tree-optimization/15347] [tree-ssa] fold if (12ers + 1 == 0).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15347 Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at use dot net

[Bug tree-optimization/37242] missed FRE opportunity because of signedness of addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242 Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at use dot net

[Bug tree-optimization/39689] IPA should compute if a function may recurse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39689 Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at use dot net

[Bug c/48793] Optimization -O2 Incorrectly Removes Logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/15347] [tree-ssa] fold if (12ers + 1 == 0).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15347 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 18:32:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) This appears to be fixed in 4.6.0. Mark as resolved? Need to add a few testcases first.

[Bug middle-end/48794] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in remap_eh_region_nr (tree-inline.c:1194) with -Os -fopenmp -fexceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48794 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in remap_eh_region_nr (tree-inline.c:1194) with -Os -fopenmp -fexceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libfortran/48511] Implement Steele-White algorithm for numeric output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 18:36:12 UTC --- I've been thinking about this issue now and then over the past few weeks, and funnily enough, while I initially thought this would be a nice improvement, I've

[Bug rtl-optimization/48774] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 optimization regression on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774 davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xinliangli at gmail

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 sing...@gcc.gnu.org singler at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||singler

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-04-27 20:23:25 UTC --- Thanks Johannes. Indeed, I was still a little nervous about those bits of losertree.h. If you can, please make sure that (even if it costs a bit of

[Bug fortran/48788] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in resolve_global_procedure (resolve.c:2190) on invalid (?) fortran code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 20:32:26 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Apr 27 20:32:21 2011 New Revision: 173048 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173048 Log: 2011-04-27 Tobias Burnus

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-27 21:08:26 UTC --- On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: I hope the problem is now fixed at mainline tree. Could you please give it a try? Bug is still present in

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org, |

[Bug target/48673] [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts on IA64.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673 --- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-04-27 21:58:53 UTC --- It looks like I was wrong about this showing up on IA64 Linux. I am only seeing it on IA64 HP-UX and only in 32 bit mode. That probably means it is related to

[Bug c++/48530] [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors with deleted d'tors

=/home/Daniel/jasongcc --enable-languages=c++ --disable-bootstrap Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.0 20110427 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-std=c++0x' '-Wall' '-shared-libgcc' '-m tune=generic' '-march=pentiumpro' /home/Daniel/jasongcc/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin

[Bug c/48793] Optimization -O2 Incorrectly Removes Logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793 --- Comment #2 from Chris DUrso chris at durso dot org 2011-04-27 22:36:16 UTC --- Hi Andreas, Are you saying that myInteger = -myInteger; or if( myInteger 0 ) is undefined for the integer MIN_INT? Read a little closer, the

[Bug middle-end/48794] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in remap_eh_region_nr (tree-inline.c:1194) with -Os -fopenmp -fexceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48794 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/48793] Optimization -O2 Incorrectly Removes Logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27 22:59:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) myInteger = -myInteger; is undefined for the integer MIN_INT? The above is undefined for the value of MIN_INT. As there is an

[Bug c++/48530] [C++0x][SFINAE] Hard errors with deleted d'tors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

  1   2   >