http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859
--- Comment #10 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11 06:03:42 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Wed May 11 06:03:38 2011
New Revision: 173644
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173644
Log:
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2011-05-11 Fabien
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958
Summary: Add runtime diagnostics for SIZE intrinsic function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48959
Summary: Dummy procedure: Argument mismatch not diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
08:16:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
PS. Note -Wconversion already DOES emit a warning for conversion to complex to
real in gfortran. e.g.
Except for very few
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
Summary: OPEN statement modifies NEWUNIT variable on error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856
Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
08:49:38 UTC ---
Some more debugging: While e-symtree == NULL, the symbols seems to be properly
resolved as e-value.function contains:
(gdb) p e-value.function-name
$11 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
09:06:30 UTC ---
The obvious problem is that there is no temporary needed for either of the
variable expressions on the right hand side - only for their combination.
Thus,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
Summary: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE(WAIT=.false.) fails on MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
09:25:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 24222
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24222
pr48944.diff
I get the following output from configure
*** This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48953
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48957
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-05-11 10:16:53 UTC ---
On Wed, 11 May 2011, psmith at gnu dot org wrote:
I think that the include-fixed directory should be associated with the
sysroot,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-05-11 10:23:53 UTC ---
On Wed, 11 May 2011, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
I get the following output from configure
*** This configuration is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28467
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10634
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
10:21:05 UTC ---
C++0x supports the desired functionality with 'constexpr'
struct Struct {
static constexpr unsigned char * pointer = (unsigned char*)0x123;
};
I think
/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/i386/libgfortran/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/gcc-4.7-20110511/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray/image_index_2.f90
-fcoarray=single -O2
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48078
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
10:35:28 UTC ---
I've just hit another variation of this bug myself.
Reduced:
class F {
void f();
};
templatetypename
void b() {
(void) F::f;
}
template void bint();
/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/gcc-4.7-20110511/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_20.f90
-O -fcoarray=single -S -m32 -o coarray_20.s(timeout = 300)
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/gcc-4.7-20110511/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_20.f90:10.9:^M
^M
call bar(A) ! { dg-error Rank
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18041
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
10:53:00 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 11 10:52:57 2011
New Revision: 173650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173650
Log:
2011-05-11 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48962
Summary: I am getting an error new.h: No such file or
directory on Fedora 13
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48963
Summary: I am getting an error new.h in Fedora 13
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48947
--- Comment #2 from Vadim Markovtsev gmarkhor at gmail dot com 2011-05-11
11:43:03 UTC ---
I ensured that. ffmpeg does not use cmake, just ordinary GNU make; no libtool
is called at all down to the point where gcc fails (checked it with make -n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48947
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
12:02:53 UTC ---
Ok. The error seems to be gold-specific though - what binutils version are
you using? Does the error persist if you use GNU ld (you need at least
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48953
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
12:23:15 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 11 12:23:12 2011
New Revision: 173653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173653
Log:
2011-05-11 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
12:23:00 UTC ---
I followed the recommendations in Optimize disk usage of
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnSetup
and applied it to the following directories:
libada gnattools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48926
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bur...@net-b.de |dominiq at lps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48953
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
12:23:49 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, queued for backporting.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
12:53:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 11 12:53:43 2011
New Revision: 173656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173656
Log:
PR debug/48159
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48962
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
12:56:14 UTC ---
*** Bug 48963 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48963
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-05-11 13:08:05 UTC ---
On Wed, 11 May 2011, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
I followed the recommendations in Optimize disk usage of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
13:07:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 11 13:07:54 2011
New Revision: 173657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173657
Log:
PR debug/48159
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr45055.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
13:43:26 UTC ---
I suspect it's http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173653, maybe
also causing some SPEC2k6 issues that I now run into.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
13:45:52 UTC ---
A) Regarding the ambiguity issue (cf. comment 0 and comment 3): As written, I
believe the interface is indeed ambiguous - if that's the case, there is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48962
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15256
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
14:13:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 11 14:13:38 2011
New Revision: 173659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173659
Log:
2011-05-11 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48966
Summary: gcc 4.5 gets wrong answer at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
15:23:28 UTC ---
Index: gcc/gimple.c
===
--- gcc/gimple.c(revision 173655)
+++ gcc/gimple.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48966
--- Comment #1 from Geir Johansen geir at cray dot com 2011-05-11 15:24:05
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The following test gets the wrong answer for optimization level -O2 (and -O3)
for GCC 4.5.3. The correct answer occurs when -O1 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48966
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
15:45:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 11 15:44:59 2011
New Revision: 173663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173663
Log:
2011-05-11 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48964
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
--- Comment #2 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery
dot com 2011-05-11 16:21:51 UTC ---
I see this too; it happens about 1 out of every 10 tries.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
--- Comment #3 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery
dot com 2011-05-11 16:25:24 UTC ---
Differences between the two .gkd dumps for a failing run:
--- pr45055.gkd2011-05-11 12:23:00.260424961 -0400
+++ pr45055.gk.gkd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-05-11 16:38:52 UTC ---
The program is executed, as the called program hello.exe prints Hello
world. After that hello.exe returns and the runtime error occurs.
Further
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-11 17:05:23
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Differences between the two .gkd dumps for a failing run:
--- pr45055.gkd2011-05-11 12:23:00.260424961 -0400
+++ pr45055.gk.gkd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
17:12:57 UTC ---
No. The list is sorted by UID, but the numbers printed out are not the UID;
they are the order in which things were pushed on to the list. Full diff, with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48947
--- Comment #4 from Vadim Markovtsev gmarkhor at gmail dot com 2011-05-11
17:29:32 UTC ---
I checked those errors with both binutils 2.21 release and 2.22 CVS (10th of
May).
gcc -###
Using built-in specs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48967
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE during use_narrower_mode
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48944
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48967
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48967
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
17:56:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 24225
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24225
gcc46-pr48967.patch
Fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
19:00:06 UTC ---
Hmm... I wonder if this does the trick? It fixes the test case,
and passes all regression tests... Paul, what do you think?
Index: dependency.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
19:19:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 24226
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24226
Draft patch (untested)
(In reply to comment #2)
The program is executed,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968
--- Comment #1 from eggert at gnu dot org 2011-05-11 19:35:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 24227
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24227
gzip-compressed u.i program, illustrating incorrect diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
19:52:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 24228
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24228
async_system - example program for MinGW by Kai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968
Summary: incorrect warning about longjmp/vfork clobbering a
local (-W -O2, x86-64)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11 19:57:21
UTC ---
Created attachment 24229
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24229
A fix for the PR
This fixes the problem in two steps:
(i) It reverts r162289;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
20:08:59 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 11 20:08:54 2011
New Revision: 173674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173674
Log:
2011-05-11 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
--- Comment #4 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011-05-11 20:16:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 24230
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24230
patch to add a -Wconversion warning for complex - real conversions
I believe the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
20:31:17 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 11 20:31:14 2011
New Revision: 173675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173675
Log:
2011-05-11 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969
Summary: ICE with -std=c++0x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48970
Summary: Inaccurate comments for processor_costs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48384
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48970
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-11 21:23:45
UTC ---
Also
const int mmxsse_to_integer; /* cost of moving mmxsse register to
integer and vice versa. */
isn't limited to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48948
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
21:30:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 11 21:30:18 2011
New Revision: 173683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173683
Log:
PR c++/48948
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
21:29:40 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 11 21:29:35 2011
New Revision: 173678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173678
Log:
PR c++/48745
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
Summary: sparc-rtems does not build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48972
Summary: OPEN with Unicode file name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48423
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-11
21:19:10 UTC ---
HJ, sorry, I'm not sure to understand the process: do you normally submit this
kind of fix also to the mainline binutils? Can Vincenzo do something
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
21:57:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 24230 [details]
patch to add a -Wconversion warning for complex - real conversions
I believe the attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48423
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-11 22:30:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
HJ, sorry, I'm not sure to understand the process: do you normally submit this
kind of fix also to the mainline binutils? Can Vincenzo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11
22:27:03 UTC ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00087.html
Regarding the implementation of true async on Windows: One should also remember
to update
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48973
Summary: Inliner bug with one-bit (1-bit) bitfield
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48948
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48745
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974
Summary: VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47453
--- Comment #3 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
2011-05-12 05:23:15 UTC ---
I think we have the FDIS clear about these cases now. To update:
// invalid
struct A { int a[2]; A():a({1, 2}) { } };
// invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34898
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
98 matches
Mail list logo
