http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
Summary: Errors during execution of make command when
installing molcas7.6
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #24 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-06 08:38:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Patch submitted to list for approval.
For a scale factor 0, we are done. Good work, thank you!
A scale factor != 0 does not work yet, you wrote you are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49294
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
08:49:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 24441
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24441
gcc47-pr49294.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41012
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49298
Summary: c++0x regression: sorry, unimplemented: unexpected ast
of kind field_decl
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49295
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||m68k-*-*
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Sch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42210
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-06
09:00:41 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 6 09:00:36 2011
New Revision: 174685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174685
Log:
PR target/42210
* config/avr/predicates.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47672
Alan Hourihane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alanh at fairlite dot co.uk
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-06 09:07:54 UTC ---
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org wrote:
> FWIW I just commented out the offending assert and the option works
> now.
>
> Is that the correct fix?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42210
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: andi-...@firstfloor.org
Created attachment 24443
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24443
usage.i
With 4.6.1 20110606 (and 4.7) and
/pkg/gcc-4.6-110606/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.1/cc1
-fpreprocessed usage.i -qu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
--- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-06
09:12:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 2
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2
profile feedback input file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
09:42:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 24445
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24445
gcc46-pr49299-test.patch
Reduced testcase. The problem is that gimple_ic doesn't expect the indirec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong |[4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-06
09:50:49 UTC ---
Thanks I'll drop the noreturn as workaround
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49298
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49300
Summary: [x86] Missing SSE4.1 intrinsic function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49298
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
10:13:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 6 10:13:23 2011
New Revision: 174688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174688
Log:
2011-06-06 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #29 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
10:13:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 6 10:13:23 2011
New Revision: 174688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174688
Log:
2011-06-06 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-06
10:21:19 UTC ---
Wasn't this fixed in r174077? If so, can this be closed now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
10:30:12 UTC ---
It doesn't make too much sense to profile (cold) noreturn functions. It's
probably easiest to not do it (check we have an outgoing edge). Another
testcase would be triggering the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49294
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06
10:36:33 UTC ---
Revision 166252 is within the range, but I fail to see the connection:
2010-11-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/43899
* runtime/error.c (generate_warning): New funct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49283
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
10:38:33 UTC ---
1) Line 2026 contains the expression
(p < buff + sizeof buff - 1)
GCC only looks at local tuple stmts when emitting the warning, so I suppose
it sees sth like
p = &buff[...];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-06
10:39:32 UTC ---
If you use my command line and just supply any random object files
for the ones specified it should reproduce I think.
If not i'll upload my builddir, but it's large.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-06
10:41:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 24446
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24446
Draft patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
10:42:23 UTC ---
I suppose we keep pointers to inline summaries live across the growth.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49280
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
10:44:43 UTC ---
Can you provide source for "random" object files?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48978
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48532
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-06-06
11:33:45 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Jun 6 11:33:42 2011
New Revision: 174694
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174694
Log:
PR preprocessor/48532
libcpp/
* directives.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
11:43:34 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 6 11:43:31 2011
New Revision: 174695
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174695
Log:
2011-06-06 Mikael Pettersson
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
11:46:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 6 11:46:14 2011
New Revision: 174696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174696
Log:
2011-06-06 Mikael Pettersson
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-06 11:49:48 UTC
---
> I suppose we keep pointers to inline summaries live across the growth.
Well, we should not. It is resized in inline_summary_alloc () and that
function
is called always before we get a
On 06/06/2011 01:38 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
For a scale factor 0, we are done. Good work, thank you!
A scale factor != 0 does not work yet, you wrote you are still working on it,
is that correct?
I am now. ;)
print "(-2pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.002E+01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at charter dot net 2011-06-06 12:09:48 UTC ---
On 06/06/2011 01:38 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
> For a scale factor 0, we are done. Good work, thank you!
>
> A scale factor != 0 does not work yet,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06
12:10:14 UTC ---
> > Revision 166252 is within the range, but I fail to see the connection:
>
> My impression - looking at the diff - is that it is a different patch.
You are right!-) Revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |libfortran
--- Comment #6 from Dom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-06-06
12:20:48 UTC ---
I will leave this to Janne. (I am very short on time.) If the fix is not
obvious, I will be happy to review the patch. It took a while for this to
surface.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06
12:25:45 UTC ---
--- /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C2011-05-31
14:24:18.0 +0200
+++ /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C2011-06-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-06 12:27:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> My confusion seems to be when scale factor is to be ignored and when not, I
> will give the standard another read.
As it happens, you're not the only o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #27 from jvdelisle at charter dot net 2011-06-06 12:36:21 UTC ---
>
> print "(-2pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.002E+01
> print "(-1pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.020E+00
> print "(0pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01
> print "(1pg1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
12:37:07 UTC ---
No, the test just should use -fno-merge-debug-strings in dg-options and
make sure it matches only DW_AT_(MIPS_|)linkage_name in .debug_info and not in
.debug_abbrev. The test will fai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06
12:36:49 UTC ---
Rainer,
What is the difference between
... [trunk revision 174614] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-06/msg00642.html (for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #28 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-06 12:41:55 UTC ---
I had a look at the code and what I think we should do is the following:
If G editing and a scale factor p != 0 is in effect, split the rounding step
into 2 steps:
First, check if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-06 12:42:14 UTC ---
With Sun as, the testcase fails, with GNU as, it passes. On IRIX 6.5,
it fails even with GNU as, haven't yet checked why.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #29 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-06 12:47:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> >
> > print "(-2pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.002E+01
> > print "(-1pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.020E+00
> > print "(0pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf, |cris-axis-elf
|spa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||48764
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-06
13:09:59 UTC ---
> ... Can you please test this on darwin ...
It works on x86_64-apple-darwin10 and powerpc-apple-darwin9. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-06 13:22:45 UTC ---
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
> 13:00:20 UTC ---
> Created attachment 24448
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24448
> gcc47-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49273
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-06-06
13:24:41 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Jun 6 13:24:39 2011
New Revision: 174697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174697
Log:
PR bootstrap/49270
* ipa-inline-analysis.c (rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49209
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-06 13:30:11 UTC ---
These programs should only be calling fatal_error from diagnostic.c, not a
function named "fatal".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Ol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49116
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49280
--- Comment #4 from Filip Hroch 2011-06-06
13:49:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Steve makes a good point. I have found that some distributions do not install
> the static libraries unless one specifically installs them. An example is
> F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
14:03:27 UTC ---
# PT = nonlocal escaped
D.7613_101 = MEM[(struct ei_matrix_storage *)this_30(D)];
# PT = nonlocal escaped
D.7616_104 = D.7613_101 + D.7582_90;
# PT = nonlocal escaped { D.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-06
14:06:06 UTC ---
The same issue in a more complicated form hits trunk in PR49279.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #11 from William J. Schmidt
2011-06-06 14:27:44 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Jun 6 14:27:41 2011
New Revision: 174701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174701
Log:
2011-06-06 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301
Summary: Forward declaration of classes broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301
jos at kuijpersvof dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2011-06-06 15:14:24
UTC ---
> @class is used to tell the compiler the class exists, but that its not (yet)
> available. Eg: class B uses class A, but class A uses class B too, creating a
> recursive import, and th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Richard Gu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48771
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson 2011-06-06
15:49:06 UTC ---
Uros, the code you generate has a double-rounding error.
You can generate code inline if you have access to SSE2,
by converting the pieces to DFmode and then truncating
to SFmode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49301
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49262
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
--- Comment #4 from Melanie Cappelaere 2011-06-06
16:27:22 UTC ---
I don't think it does, but it also doesn't matter for this bug report; symbols
are not hidden while they should be.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
17:12:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 6 17:12:25 2011
New Revision: 174711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174711
Log:
PR c++/49264
* gimple-fold.c (fold_stmt_1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
17:14:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 6 17:14:31 2011
New Revision: 174712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174712
Log:
PR c++/49264
* gimple-fold.c (fold_stmt_1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
17:16:37 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 6 17:16:35 2011
New Revision: 174713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174713
Log:
PR c++/49264
* gimple-fold.c (fold_stmt_1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1
c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49262
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
17:46:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 6 17:46:00 2011
New Revision: 174715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174715
Log:
PR debug/49262
* dwarf2out.c (native_encode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
17:46:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 6 17:46:47 2011
New Revision: 174716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174716
Log:
PR testsuite/49288
* g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303
Summary: ICE: vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1277 w/ -O3 on
ia64 in r174558
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
