http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49603
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49603
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
06:56:21 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 1 06:56:18 2011
New Revision: 175746
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175746
Log:
2011-07-01 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49603
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49602
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49596
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49595
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 07:21:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
darwin_closure.S was touched a while ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-12/msg00700.html
by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #17 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-07-01
07:54:05 UTC ---
4.3.6 w/ gnat rebuilt itself fine with a fairly small patch kit (about 30
wrong-code fixes, almost half of them m68k-specific). However, 4.4.6 with a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-07-01 08:40:13 UTC
---
Confirmed, we shouldn't be emitting ~B because it's not needed. Probably
introduced by r173517,
2011-05-06 Jan Hubicka j...@suse.cz
* cgraph.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-01 08:48:07 UTC ---
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-07-01 08:40:13
UTC ---
[...]
I believed that thunks always belong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49549
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 08:59:23 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jul 1 08:59:20 2011
New Revision: 175749
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175749
Log:
libmudflap:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49549
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49605
Summary: -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor is not picky enough
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49605
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #38 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-07-01 09:22:48 UTC ---
The Fortran standards committee has voted to edit the standard:
http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/195/11-174r2.txt
This makes our current
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-07-01 09:30:41 UTC
---
This is Tru64 UNIX with ECOFF, no named sections, no COMDAT groups.
Yep, I know, but the question is how absence of COMDAT groups changes behaviour
of thunks.
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49605
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-01 10:03:24 UTC ---
The declaration of the destructor itself do have COMDAT flag.
The following patch should fix the problem:
Index: ipa.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 10:09:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
During build of gcc-4.6.1 on powerpc-darwin8 (after having disabled
libquadmath
from PR 49582), I get a compilation error in libffi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24589|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49596
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
11:13:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 1 11:13:13 2011
New Revision: 175753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175753
Log:
2011-07-01 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49602
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29357
Michael Schulze mschulze at ivs dot cs.ovgu.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mschulze
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49606
Summary: mips64: Unrecognizable insn when one noreturn function
calling another noreturn function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49606
--- Comment #1 from Martin Decky martin at decky dot cz 2011-07-01 12:12:47
UTC ---
A minimal set of GCC command line arguments that still trigger the bug:
/usr/local/cross/mips64/bin/mips64el-linux-gnu-gcc -mabi=o64 -mlong64 -c
generic/libc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49557
--- Comment #8 from Arjen Markus arjen.markus895 at gmail dot com 2011-07-01
12:37:06 UTC ---
Hi Eric,
I have run into a problem on a Linux machin with this:
make[3]: Leaving directory `/u/markus/tmp/gcc4.6.1/build-gcc/gcc'
mkdir -p --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49557
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
12:46:22 UTC ---
configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
See `config.log' for more details.
Do exactly this, that will tell you what
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49557
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
12:47:16 UTC ---
FAQ: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure_suffix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-01
12:49:45 UTC ---
He is using my proposed fink gcc46 packaging so it should be...
../gcc-4.6.1/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6
--mandir=/sw/share/man
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49557
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
12:50:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
../gcc-4.6.1-RC-20110620/configure
--with-gmp-include=d:/gcc4.6.1.src/gmp-5.0.2
--with-gmp-lib=d:/gcc4.6.1.src/gmp-5.0.2/.libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
12:57:15 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 1 12:57:11 2011
New Revision: 175756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175756
Log:
Use proper mode for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 13:02:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
He is using my proposed fink gcc46 packaging so it should be...
../gcc-4.6.1/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49605
--- Comment #3 from miles at gnu dot org 2011-07-01 13:25:23 UTC ---
Here's another test case which is closer to the real code that prompted this
bug report:
struct X
{
~X ();
virtual void meth () = 0;
};
struct Y : X
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49605
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
13:34:56 UTC ---
Thanks, that's fixed by my patch too. I'll submit it to gcc-patches for review
later today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49085
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
13:36:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 1 13:36:17 2011
New Revision: 175758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175758
Log:
PR c++/49085
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49607
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL:
22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/wchar_t/wrapped_locale.
cc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49607
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-01 14:07:55 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Bryan Hundven bryanhundven at gmail dot com 2011-06-29
19:30:03 UTC ---
[...]
So, Yann found that sh4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49602
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
14:52:30 UTC ---
The problem is that for the debug uses before going into SSA we obviously don't
want the uses to affect code generation and thus we don't call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49608
Summary: Ada option handling kludges
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-07-01 15:32:35 UTC ---
On 1-Jul-11, at 6:47 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
here is fixed version that does not warn. Can someone try it out,
please?
While test on darwin9 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49609
Summary: No code emitted for address-taken instances of
function templates
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49606
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|mips64: Unrecognizable insn |mips64: o64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47406
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49609
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
16:19:27 UTC ---
The C++ standard lists the contexts in which an overloaded function name can be
used without arguments, and reinterpret_cast is not one of them.
Based on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49495
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49085
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49609
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
16:34:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
The C++ standard lists the contexts in which an overloaded function name can
be
used without arguments, and reinterpret_cast is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49522
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49495
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48883
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48883
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
16:50:36 UTC ---
Is this related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49609#c2 ?
The ternary operator is not one of the contexts listed in 13.4 [over.over] p1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49408
--- Comment #2 from jkratoch at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 17:16:51 UTC ---
Author: jkratoch
Date: Fri Jul 1 17:16:44 2011
New Revision: 175761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175761
Log:
libiberty/
PR debug/49408
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49408
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49610
Summary: Segfault with -ftree-vectorize (or -O3)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48593
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49609
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48883
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||srk31 at srcf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48261
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49609
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Kell srk31 at srcf dot ucam.org 2011-07-01
18:09:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
That paragraph says that if template argument deduction succeeds then an
instantiation is generated. In your case deduction doesn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49495
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #7 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2011-07-01
18:13:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Created attachment 24655 [details]
make sure that the size of the dyld_stub_binding_helper is adjusted for arch.
please try this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49546
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2011-07-01 18:35:22 UTC ---
New GDB test:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-07/msg00020.html
gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test type of F in k3_m
gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test value of F in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49609
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
18:56:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
That's a pretty strained reading. Even if that were pedantically what the
standard says, it would clearly be an oversight.
ok,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49610
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #25 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-07-01 19:36:06
UTC ---
Applied the diff from svn r172920 to the Debian gcc-4.6 source package as well;
let’s see whether this works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49610
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-07-01
19:44:36 UTC ---
It could be due to revision 174425:
Author:irar
Date:Mon May 30 07:15:31 2011 UTC (4 weeks, 4 days ago)
Changed paths:5
Log Message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49605
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48883
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
20:24:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 1 20:24:08 2011
New Revision: 175764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175764
Log:
PR c++/48883
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48593
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
20:24:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 1 20:24:25 2011
New Revision: 175765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175765
Log:
PR c++/48593
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49609
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
20:24:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 1 20:24:08 2011
New Revision: 175764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175764
Log:
PR c++/48883
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48261
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
20:24:41 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 1 20:24:38 2011
New Revision: 175766
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175766
Log:
PR c++/48261
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48883
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48593
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48261
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
21:10:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
+ DECL_COMDAT (node-decl) = DECL_COMDAT (decl_node-decl);
if (DECL_ONE_ONLY (decl_node-decl))
{
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49589
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49605
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01
22:24:48 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jul 1 22:24:42 2011
New Revision: 175771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175771
Log:
2011-07-01 Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49605
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611
Summary: Inline asm should support input/output of flags
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598
--- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2011-07-02
00:52:57 UTC ---
This compiled on gcc-4.5 but the answer is junk.
ed@bad-horse:~$ g++ -std=c++0x -o lamb2 lamb2.cpp
ed@bad-horse:~$ ./lamb2
value capture
i: 10
ir:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #39 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02
01:32:42 UTC ---
Very Good, I will work toward this end.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49612
Summary: LTO cannot link objects
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
86 matches
Mail list logo
