http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26353|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45434
--- Comment #8 from Adam Warner 2012-01-18
07:00:44 UTC ---
Apologies for the noise. I had my machine constraints around the wrong way.
Here is the fixed version of the code:
#include
uint64_t u8l(uint64_t in) {
uint64_t out;
asm ("movzbl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51888
--- Comment #2 from Kohei Takahashi 2012-01-18 06:24:50
UTC ---
Oh, I did not check about trunk. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression]
|natObject.cc:58
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
--- Comment #2 from gee 2012-01-18 06:14:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hmm, this might be a duplicate for already fixed PR/50053. Could you please
> check, if you still have this issue here with current trunk version.
>
> Thanks
Startin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50656
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50656
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18
05:42:47 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 18 05:42:41 2012
New Revision: 183270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183270
Log:
PR go/50656
* go.test/go-test.exp (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51879
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18 05:41:34 UTC ---
This works for the 3 examples:
...
Index: tree-ssa-sccvn.c
===
--- tree-ssa-sccvn.c (revision 182098)
+++ tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51598
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51889
Bug #: 51889
Summary: [4.7 regression] can't override a using-declaration in
a template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51888
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, rejects-valid
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45434
--- Comment #7 from Adam Warner 2012-01-18
03:35:24 UTC ---
It does not appear to be possible to generate inline asm that leaves GCC to
choose the {ah, bh, ch, dh} register:
#include
uint64_t u8l(uint64_t in) {
uint64_t out;
asm ("movzbl %
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51888
Bug #: 51888
Summary: [C++11]warn comma at end of enumerator list with
-pedantic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24163
Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zooko at zooko dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51887
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-18
01:04:51 UTC ---
Related to bug 51859.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|ICE with c++11 thr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-17
23:58:06 UTC ---
reducing ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.marlier at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51192
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 20:37:59 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jan 17 20:37:46 2012
New Revision: 183262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183262
Log:
gcc/
2012-01-17 Andreas Krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #37 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 20:37:58 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jan 17 20:37:46 2012
New Revision: 183262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183262
Log:
gcc/
2012-01-17 Andreas Krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51887
Bug #: 51887
Summary: wrapped function with LTO - multiple prevailing defs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51886
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-17
20:02:17 UTC ---
I think there might be a dup of this bug already in bugzilla.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51880
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51886
--- Comment #1 from roland at gnu dot org 2012-01-17 18:59:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 26357
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26357
C++ test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51886
Bug #: 51886
Summary: __alignof__ on uninstantiated template type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51885
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51885
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-17
18:38:35 UTC ---
What happens if you add to the command line -fno-strict-aliasing? If things
'improve' it means that with your reinterpret_cast & co you have aliasing
violations, thus undefined behavio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51885
Bug #: 51885
Summary: g++ compiler options -O2 and -O3 modifies program
results
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51883
--- Comment #2 from mdblack98 at yahoo dot com 2012-01-17 17:13:20 UTC ---
I should have realized that. Indeed those warning don't show up in later
stages.
Sorry for the noise.
-Original Message-
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
--- Comment #2 from Francesco Biscani 2012-01-17
17:03:03 UTC ---
Sorry, had initially uploaded the wrong code snippet, now it should be the
correct one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
--- Comment #1 from Francesco Biscani 2012-01-17
17:02:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 26355
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26355
Code snippet demonstrating the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
Bug #: 51884
Summary: ICE with c++11 thread and templates
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51872
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40778
--- Comment #11 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2012-01-17
16:23:15 UTC ---
Jakub's patch makes sense to me in the sense that it's the least modification
over what's there.
Unfortunately, I do not recall what other problems there were with
instrumenting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-17 16:23:07 UTC ---
> --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-13
> 20:36:16 UTC ---
> PR51471 patch has been committed by now, can you recheck if it didn't fix also
> this PR?
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51872
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-17
16:21:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 17 16:21:49 2012
New Revision: 183254
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183254
Log:
PR bootstrap/51872
* hard-reg-set.h (struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Bonzini 2012-01-17 16:22:08
UTC ---
Yeah, perhaps you can make the code nicer by avoiding the nested loops:
for (use_rec = DF_INSN_EQ_USES (insn); *use_rec; use_rec++)
{
df_ref use = *use_rec;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51883
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
--- Comment #5 from Pawel Sikora 2012-01-17 16:06:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Tom, I assume the plan for the libstdc++ python printers is to have a
> python/libstdcxx/v7/printers.py for the libstdc++.so.7 library, right?
>
> As we have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-01-17
16:05:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 26353
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26353
untested patch
I've tried to implement what Paolo suggests, the attached patch bootstraps but
o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-17
16:00:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 26352
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26352
gcc47-pr50237.patch
Untested patch. For ia64 I've kept it (hopefully) as is, for other targets
thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47852
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51173
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2012-01-17 15:42:51 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Jan 17 15:42:47 2012
New Revision: 183253
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183253
Log:
Skip static_ctor.C test (PR libitm/51173)
PR libitm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47852
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2012-01-17 15:41:17 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Jan 17 15:41:10 2012
New Revision: 183251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183251
Log:
Link libstdc++ with -lpthread on IRIX 6 (PR target/47852
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-17
15:39:19 UTC ---
strace showing that file-locking, even with using gettid doesn't work:
16980 gettid(
16981 gettid() = 16981
16981 open("/tmp/t.gcda", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51883
Bug #: 51883
Summary: Build warning unknown conversion type in gimplify.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51807
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-17
15:20:42 UTC ---
Making __gcov_var TLS also works, with similar restrictions. Thus completely
privatizing the state and allocating/deallocating it via gcov_open/close seems
to be a proper re-workin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-17
14:53:06 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 17 14:52:57 2012
New Revision: 183249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183249
Log:
2012-01-17 Richard Guenther
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-17
14:39:47 UTC ---
It doesn't really help - there are more races. The following does seem
to help though, but is certainly not applicable.
Index: gcc/libgcov.c
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51869
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51869
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-17
14:34:46 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Jan 17 14:34:37 2012
New Revision: 183247
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183247
Log:
2012-01-17 Tobias Burnus
Janne Blom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51178
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi |arm-none-eabi,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51882
Bug #: 51882
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 (unrecognizable
insn) when building Mesa on ARM
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-17
13:48:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 26349 [details]
> gcc47-pr51876.patch
>
> Untested fix (well, tested that the ICEs are gone on all these tests with a
> cross). v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51165
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51165
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-17
13:20:34 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Jan 17 13:20:28 2012
New Revision: 183242
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183242
Log:
PR other/51165
* trans-mem.c (requ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51881
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51881
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-17
13:10:15 UTC ---
Or for a better example, this is basically what your program tries to do:
foo f;
f.v = std::vector(3);
while (ss >> f)
std::cout << f << '\n';
That shows the sa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51881
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-17
13:07:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Since stream_iterator.h _M_read() works on this copy (_M_value) the second
> application of operator >> () simply append 4 5 6 to the values already
> pres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51871
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-17 13:04:28 UTC ---
On 17-Jan-12, at 4:51 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Can you specify a range for working/failing revisions?
Not at the moment. The build was done with the --wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51881
Bug #: 51881
Summary: istream_iterator copy leads to incorrect value read
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-17
12:54:18 UTC ---
I assume you were just hitting "refresh" on this page. If you (accidentally)
changed the component once and refresh, most browsers will keep your chosen
selection in the form, so if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
--- Comment #12 from nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com 2012-01-17 12:50:01
UTC ---
I didn't change it o.o
Maybe something's wrong with my browser
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libobjc |libstdc++
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51880
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-17
12:33:07 UTC ---
bas/ld bug:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51880
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-17
12:15:58 UTC ---
GAS can assemble the ICC assembly just fine and we can then link it just fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51880
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.4.0, 4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Richa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51880
Bug #: 51880
Summary: protected visibility does not link
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |libobjc
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #36 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 11:43:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> So, Richard, are you going to commit it?
I'd prefer it if someone else did TBH.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-17
11:37:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If not, it sounds like something that can fixed just by wrapping the #include
> in a namespace std block.
That could never work.
1) namespace are ignored
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51878
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51844
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40778
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-17
11:12:43 UTC ---
So, Richard, are you going to commit it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51879
Bug #: 51879
Summary: Missed tail merging with non-const/pure calls
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51877
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51777
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51777
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-17 11:05:23 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 17 11:05:20 2012
New Revision: 183238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183238
Log:
2012-01-17 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
--- Comment #17 from Zdenek Dvorak 2012-01-17
11:01:45 UTC ---
> > LSM will move inter[1] to a temporary variable regardless of the locks,
> > which
> > will cause race conditions with other threads (and whether loop header is
> > copied or not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libobjc |libstdc++
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-01-17 10:40:31 UTC ---
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
>
> --- Comment #14 from Zdenek Dvorak 2012-01-17
> 10:19:01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51877
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-17
10:38:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 17 10:38:38 2012
New Revision: 183237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183237
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51877
* tree-ssa-tail-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51867
--- Comment #3 from amker.cheng 2012-01-17
10:35:14 UTC ---
test case c-c++-common/dfp/signbit-2.c depends on this check.
the case is like:
-
/* { dg-options "-O0" } */
/* Check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
--- Comment #14 from Zdenek Dvorak 2012-01-17
10:19:01 UTC ---
> > Also, the warning is at least morally right. If R <= 1, the original code
> > will
> > pass inter to foo uninitialized, which probably is not intended. So, the
> > right
> > t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51877
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
Version|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51875
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo