[Bug fortran/35015] missing cleanup-modules directive in testsuite/gfortran*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35015 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug libstdc++/51785] gets not anymore declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-02 07:29:29 UTC --- extern "C" extern (twice) - too many externs?

[Bug tree-optimization/52459] [x86] loop performance very bad (worse than -O0) when using sse4.2 popcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[x86] loop vectorization|[x86] loop performance very

[Bug libstdc++/51785] gets not anymore declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785 --- Comment #24 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-03-02 07:14:02 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Fri Mar 2 07:13:55 2012 New Revision: 184774 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184774 Log: 2012-03-01 Benjamin Kosnik Ramana

[Bug tree-optimization/52459] [x86] loop vectorization performance very bad (worse than -O0) when using sse4.2 popcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459 --- Comment #1 from M8R-ynb11d at mailinator dot com 2012-03-02 07:11:47 UTC --- Similar (but much slower) results when not using SSE and using the libgcc library version of __builtin_popcount: -O0: 22.55 secs -O1: 20.57 secs -O2: 22.48 secs -Os:

[Bug tree-optimization/52459] New: [x86] loop vectorization performance very bad (worse than -O0) when using sse4.2 popcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459 Bug #: 52459 Summary: [x86] loop vectorization performance very bad (worse than -O0) when using sse4.2 popcnt Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug libstdc++/51785] gets not anymore declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26794|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/52458] [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Kulentsov 2012-03-02 02:19:02 UTC --- Created attachment 26806 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26806 -v compiler output

[Bug c++/52458] New: [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458 Bug #: 52458 Summary: [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered. Classification:

[Bug lto/43576] lto: ICE with partial linking (ld -r, both bfd and gold)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43576 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-02 02:10:42 UTC --- I think this is fixed now see PR 44992.

[Bug target/52457] Wrong VSX code generation bug when compiled with -O1 -m32 -mcpu=power7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52457 --- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner 2012-03-02 01:59:22 UTC --- I'm bootstrapping the following patch which fixes the bug for me. Index: gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md === --- gcc/config/rs

[Bug target/52457] New: Wrong VSX code generation bug when compiled with -O1 -m32 -mcpu=power7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52457 Bug #: 52457 Summary: Wrong VSX code generation bug when compiled with -O1 -m32 -mcpu=power7 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug libstdc++/52456] New: FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

4.7.0 20120301 (experimental) [trunk revision 184680] (GCC)

[Bug rtl-optimization/52060] [4.6 Regression] Invalid constant simplification in combine with parallel result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 --- Comment #14 from Jing Yu 2012-03-02 01:01:31 UTC --- Author: jingyu Date: Fri Mar 2 01:01:16 2012 New Revision: 184771 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184771 Log: 2012-03-01 Jing Yu Backport r184061 from gcc-

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #29 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-03-02 00:54:53 UTC --- Is it possible to target this to 4.7? These optimization issues result in benchmarcably slower code...

[Bug c++/44673] static const variable works in if/else, fails at linking in ternary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44673 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||scott at lurndal dot org --- Comment #17

[Bug c++/52455] Symbolic constant treated as extern when -O not specified resulting in undefined symbol at link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52455 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52455] New: Symbolic constant treated as extern when -O not specified resulting in undefined symbol at link

ild=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local --with-mpc=/usr/local/ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20120301 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-c' '-o' '

[Bug target/49206] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] RA failure in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206 --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-01 23:04:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > This went away with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181075 > but was it really a fix for this, rather than just something that made the bug >

[Bug target/48096] gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE fails with Xcode 4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48096 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/11736] Stackpointer messed up on SuperH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11736 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52441] SH Target: Double sign/zero extensions for function arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52441 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/11736] Stackpointer messed up on SuperH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11736 --- Comment #9 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-03-01 22:03:09 UTC --- I think so too.

[Bug target/52441] SH Target: Double sign/zero extensions for function arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52441 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-03-01 22:00:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > The sign/zero extensions in the caller (_xx) are not emitted when using the > original Renesas ABI (-mrenesas), which is correct. Correct for efficiency,

[Bug target/49206] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] RA failure in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-01 21:31:33 UTC --- This went away with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181075 but was it really a fix for this, rather than just something that made the bug latent?

[Bug c++/52454] New: [C++0x] Variadic template expansion as template parameters does not work in typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52454 Bug #: 52454 Summary: [C++0x] Variadic template expansion as template parameters does not work in typedef Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Sta

[Bug rtl-optimization/11736] Stackpointer messed up on SuperH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11736 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/51930] [4.7 regression] Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930 --- Comment #20 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-03-01 20:53:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > It is clear that the behavior is not equivalent. The warning before was > conditional on -Wattributes, but now it is unconditional. Was this > inten

[Bug c++/51930] [4.7 regression] Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/47581] [4.5 regression] Unnecessary adjustments to stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.5.4

[Bug target/48096] gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE fails with Xcode 4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48096 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2012-03-01 20:09:08 UTC --- Both the gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c and g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation failures are no longer present in gcc trunk when tested against Xcode 4.2 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 or

[Bug target/49206] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] RA failure in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-01 19:57:27 UTC --- The testcase works OK for 4.7, 64bit and 32bit targets. GCC: (GNU) 4.7.0 20120229 (experimental) [trunk revision 184671] I propose to add the testcase to the 4.7 torture testsuite and

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/52408] Incorrect assembler generated for zvdep_imm64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52408 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2012-03-01 19:31:16 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Thu Mar 1 19:31:03 2012 New Revision: 184757 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184757 Log: PR target/52408 * config/pa/pa.md (zv

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/49069] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 --- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2012-03-01 19:27:56 UTC --- Created attachment 26804 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26804 Tighten predicates

[Bug fortran/48820] TR 29113: Implement parts needed for MPI 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-01 19:07:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created attachment 26799 [details] > Patch for TYPE(*) Just a warning to testers: I have the impression that for scalar allocatables and pointers, the wrong

[Bug fortran/52452] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] INTRINSIC cannot be applied to gfortran's ETIME

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/49069] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work|4.

[Bug tree-optimization/49069] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org Comp

[Bug rtl-optimization/52417] [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51930] [4.7 regression] Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930 --- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-01 17:52:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 1 17:52:12 2012 New Revision: 184753 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184753 Log: PR c++/51930 * decl.c (check_tag_decl): Mo

[Bug rtl-optimization/52417] [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-03-01 16:58:17 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Mar 1 16:58:11 2012 New Revision: 184750 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184750 Log: PR debug/52001 PR rtl-optimization/52417 * cseli

[Bug debug/52001] [4.7 Regression] Huge compile-time regression with var-tracking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52001 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-03-01 16:58:17 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Mar 1 16:58:11 2012 New Revision: 184750 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184750 Log: PR debug/52001 PR rtl-optimization/52417 * cseli

[Bug rtl-optimization/52417] [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-01 16:54:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > This patch is ok for trunk if it passes testing, please get it in before > tomorrow noon UTC. Thanks. The avr test suite passes fine with the patch :-)

[Bug c++/52453] compiling error when get address of a virtual function(invalid use of non-static member function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52453 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-01 16:42:42 UTC --- yes, the C++ standard is very clear about this: A pointer to member is only formed when an explicit & is used and its operand is a qualified-id not enclosed in parentheses. [ Note:

[Bug c++/52453] compiling error when get address of a virtual function(invalid use of non-static member function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52453 --- Comment #2 from Allen Wu 2012-03-01 16:40:07 UTC --- Thank you for your response. But I cannot see any difference between &Test::func and &(Test::func). Does C++ standard specify &(Test::func) is illegal? Thanks in advance. Allen 2012/3/2 re

[Bug c++/52453] compiling error when get address of a virtual function(invalid use of non-static member function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52453 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49069] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-03-01 16:08:35 UTC --- The real question is why is a cstore operation being called with constants for the two operands in the comparison. If it knows the constants, then it knows the result of the compar

[Bug c++/52453] New: compiling error when get address of a virtual function(invalid use of non-static member function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52453 Bug #: 52453 Summary: compiling error when get address of a virtual function(invalid use of non-static member function) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.2.4

[Bug tree-optimization/52448] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] cselim broken with calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52448 --- Comment #5 from Michael Matz 2012-03-01 16:08:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > We can ignore back edges, > hence the path between both accesses are acyclic, so we might still get away > with a non-iterating algorithm. Of course we canno

[Bug c/52451] gcc w/i387 float generates fucom rather than fcom for floating point comparsons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52450] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52445] [4.6 Regression] conditional store replacement causes segfault in generated code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4

[Bug tree-optimization/52450] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450 Bug #: 52450 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O1 and above Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c/52451] New: gcc w/i387 float generates fucom rather than fcom for floating point comparsons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451 Bug #: 52451 Summary: gcc w/i387 float generates fucom rather than fcom for floating point comparsons Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Statu

[Bug lto/47841] [4.6/4.7 Regression] New guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47841 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/48173] [4.6 regression] bootstrap error on arm-linux-gnueabi (defaulting to armv4t)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48173 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/52417] [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug libstdc++/50951] state of subtract_with_carry_engine not saved correctly to output stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50951 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52452] New: INTRINSIC cannot be applied to gfortran's ETIME

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452 Bug #: 52452 Summary: INTRINSIC cannot be applied to gfortran's ETIME Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/50881] [4.6 Regression] ICE Segfault on compare this pointer with reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/52450] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-03-01 15:02:13 UTC --- Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error. foo (t=...) at /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c:10 10return t.i[0]; (gdb) p/x $pc $3 = 0x2c30 (gdb) disas

[Bug rtl-optimization/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper FP reg in SImode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/52445] [4.6 Regression] conditional store replacement causes segfault in generated code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.6.3 Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regress

[Bug libgcj/44415] [4.6/4.7 regression] gmp multilib support broke bootstrap with static libgmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug lto/51432] [4.6 regression] ICE in -flto -std=c++0x -g with cross-compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51432 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/45325] [4.6/4.7 Regression] target attribute doesn't work with -march=i586

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/50205] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6581 with -fselective-scheduling2 and custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/51520] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/48308] [4.6/4.7 Regression] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/50807] [avr] Constructor writing to RAM for variable in Flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50807 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/50275] [4.6 regression] libgcc build failure on LM32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50275 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/50213] [4.6 Regression] Regression in space-optimized code relative to 4.5.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/49775] [4.6/4.7 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/48949] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 regression with complex.h on i386-pc-solaris2.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48949 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/50444] [4.6 Regression] -ftree-sra ignores alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/46076] [4.6 regression] constant propagation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] [4.6 regression] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug lto/47889] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Segmentation fault in useless_type_conversion_p, at tree-ssa.c:1228

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/47679] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Strange uninitialized warning after SRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/52062] [4.6 regression] public generic name, specific functions of private types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52062 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/47471] [4.6/4.7 Regression] stdarg functions extraneous too-early prologue end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug java/44495] [4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in java_mangle_resource_name, at java/mangle.c:658

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/52445] [4.6/4.7 Regression] conditional store replacement causes segfault in generated code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missing optimization due to function splitting and redundant conditionals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug lto/47936] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO due to strict aliasing issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/44688] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Excessive code-size growth at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/50852] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11030

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/51619] [c++0x] [4.6 Regression] ICE with array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug lto/47888] [4.6/4.7 Regression] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6249 / Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/47333] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/47581] [4.5 regression] Unnecessary adjustments to stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/51138] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] Uninitialized list elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51138 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/52326] [4.6 Regression] float result incorrect with -O1 and calling external function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52326 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/45978] [4.6 Regression] bogus "array subscript is above array bounds" warning in extremely simple code with no loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

  1   2   >