http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52529
Bug #: 52529
Summary: Compiler rejects template code inconsistently
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-08
07:19:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Re-reading the standard, I think the non-BIND(C) version of TYPE(*) is
> currently mishandled. That should be only visible for "TYPE(*)" dummies which
> ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52528
Bug #: 52528
Summary: combine bug (powerpc testcase)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52518
--- Comment #7 from casey at rodarmor dot com 2012-03-08 05:08:08 UTC ---
Not exactly what I was hoping for, but thanks for the speedy resolution :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46942
Meador Inge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meadori at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #23 from Oleg Endo 2012-03-08
01:25:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 26853
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26853
Patch for the patch
The attached patch seems to fix the problem.
GCC (C,C++) and CSiBE set compiles wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-08
01:05:07 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Mar 8 01:05:01 2012
New Revision: 185089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185089
Log:
PR libstdc++/52433
* include/debug/safe_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52527
Bug #: 52527
Summary: When using '-g', get an ICE: seg fault in
add_name_attribute (called by modified_type_die)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52523
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Component: libitm
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: patrick.marl...@gmail.com
CC: torv...@gcc.gnu.org
Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
libitm (default configuration/4.8.0 20120307) is stuck in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52524
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52503
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-03-07
22:06:28 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed Mar 7 22:06:25 2012
New Revision: 185081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185081
Log:
PR target/52503
* config/sh/sh.opt (mso
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52525
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52525
--- Comment #1 from Szilárd Páll 2012-03-07
21:36:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 26852
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26852
preprocessed source file for reproducing bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52525
Bug #: 52525
Summary: compiler segmentation fault when building OpenMP code
with -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52524
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-07
20:35:46 UTC ---
I think this has already been fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52510
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-07 20:34:57 UTC ---
A reghunt revealed that this patch (r184876) is indeed the culprit:
2012-03-03 Jason Merrill
Core 1270
* call.c (build_aggr_conv): Call reshape_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52524
Bug #: 52524
Summary: Segfault compiling libgcov.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52523
Bug #: 52523
Summary: Missing "uninitialized" warning in simple code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-07
20:20:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 7 20:20:00 2012
New Revision: 185079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185079
Log:
PR c++/52521
* mangle.c (write_literal_oper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-07
20:16:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 7 20:16:16 2012
New Revision: 185077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185077
Log:
PR c++/52521
* mangle.c (write_literal_oper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52522
--- Comment #4 from Dave Steffen 2012-03-07
19:06:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The cause for this problem is the currently unconstrained constructor
>
> template
> vector(InputIter, InputIter);
>
> but I need to investigate whether thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43813
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgsteffen at numerica dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52522
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52522
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-07
18:32:56 UTC ---
Clang gives a very similar result, so I'm not convinced it's a bug:
t.cc:12:2: error: call to 'horizontalConcat' is ambiguous
horizontalConcat({a,b});
^~~~
t.cc:6:8: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52510
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2012-03-07 17:49:20 UTC
---
Nothing Solaris-specific here, fails in the same way on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
as of r185060.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52522
Bug #: 52522
Summary: Overloaded functions called with initializer lists
considered ambiguous
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52520
Bernhard Rosenkränzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-07
16:09:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Can't reproduce this though.
Strange. I still see the ICE with current trunk. It's a 32 bit build and host;
might this have an impact?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346
--- Comment #8 from Ryan Johnson 2012-03-07 14:28:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, scovich at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346
> >
> > --- Comment #6 from Ryan Johnson 2012-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
Bug #: 52521
Summary: [C++11] user defined literals and order of declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52484
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-07
13:52:37 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 7 13:52:30 2012
New Revision: 185043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185043
Log:
PR target/52484
* config/avr/avr.md (xload
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52484
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-07 13:39:19 UTC ---
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, scovich at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346
>
> --- Comment #6 from Ryan Johnson 2012-03-07
> 13:31:19 UTC --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346
--- Comment #6 from Ryan Johnson 2012-03-07 13:31:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, scovich at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from Ryan Johnson 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52520
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-03-07
13:07:24 UTC ---
May be fixed by r185028. Please update and try again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Johnson 2012-03-07 13:02:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> 4.6 should be broken as well for you?
Oops. I reported wrong in my OP. I've actually been using a home-built 4.6.2
for some time now... and it is the host com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
--disable-libitm
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120307 (experimental) (GCC)
gmp 5.0.4
mpfr 3.1.0
mpc 0.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52520
--- Comment #3 from Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2012-03-07 12:23:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 26851
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26851
slightly reduced test case
I'm familiar with delta, but it's not very useful in this particul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512
--- Comment #3 from Marco van Hulten 2012-03-07
12:15:36 UTC ---
This work-around of changing all entries to tracer(N:N) indeed works, in both
the test case as for my original code where I found the problem. That is the
NEMO 3.1 ocean model, wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-03-07
12:00:42 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Mar 7 12:00:37 2012
New Revision: 185036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185036
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52203
* sel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52520
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Steven Boss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52520
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2012-03-07
11:39:29 UTC ---
Author: corsepiu
Date: Wed Mar 7 11:39:25 2012
New Revision: 185035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185035
Log:
2012-03-05 Ralf Corsépius
PR target/514
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52520
Bug #: 52520
Summary: trunk: internal compiler error: in predict_insn, at
predict.c:477
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Reichardt 2012-03-07 11:07:33
UTC ---
nice!
i willl build it and publish it on avrfreaks soon, so Markus can try it out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2012-03-07
10:59:59 UTC ---
Author: corsepiu
Date: Wed Mar 7 10:59:56 2012
New Revision: 185034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185034
Log:
2012-03-05 Ralf Corsépius
PR target/514
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52507
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-07
10:39:45 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 7 10:39:42 2012
New Revision: 185033
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185033
Log:
PR target/52507
* config/avr/lib1funcs.S (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52506
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-07
10:38:28 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 7 10:38:25 2012
New Revision: 185032
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185032
Log:
PR target/52506
* gcc/config/avr/avr.c (ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52505
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-07
10:36:34 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 7 10:36:30 2012
New Revision: 185031
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185031
Log:
libgcc/
PR target/52505
* config/avr/lib1f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52508
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-07
10:33:24 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 7 10:33:19 2012
New Revision: 185030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185030
Log:
libgcc/
PR target/52461
PR target/52508
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-07
10:33:24 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 7 10:33:19 2012
New Revision: 185030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185030
Log:
libgcc/
PR target/52461
PR target/52508
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
--- Comment #5 from Markus Faust 2012-03-07
10:12:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This bug tracker if for the official GCC hosted by FSF, not for private ports.
Sorry about that.
Yesterday I found Stefan's binaries (Thanks, Stefan):
gcc ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52519
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38987
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-07
09:55:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:55:26 2012
New Revision: 185029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185029
Log:
2012-03-07 Richard Guenther
PR pch/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52518
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52518
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-07
09:55:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:55:26 2012
New Revision: 185029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185029
Log:
2012-03-07 Richard Guenther
PR pch/525
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-07 09:50:41 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:50:36 2012
New Revision: 185028
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185028
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/52515
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52518
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Version|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52516
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-cygwin
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52510
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-07
09:26:13 UTC ---
Re-reading the standard, I think the non-BIND(C) version of TYPE(*) is
currently mishandled. That should be only visible for "TYPE(*)" dummies which
are INTENT(OUT) and where the actu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52519
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-07
08:54:23 UTC ---
might be the same as PR 52515
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49976
Vasily Sukhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 |powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
Versi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49976
Vasily Sukhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24915|0 |1
is obsolete|
79 matches
Mail list logo
