[Bug c++/52837] ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug target/52836] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at config/arm/arm.c:13084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52836 Chung-Lin Tang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #38 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-03 03:41:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #37) > Actually, it's not clear to me that the caret line would be likely to cause > trouble for IDEs in any case; they already have to deal with output that isn'

[Bug ada/52752] GNAT bug box on instantiation of subprogram with "not null"-qualified named access type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52752 denkpadje at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denkpadje at gmail dot com --

[Bug target/52828] powerpc -m32 -Os writes register saves below stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52828 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/52839] New: double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 Bug #: 52839 Summary: double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug java/52815] class.c:2815:53: error: 'JCR_SECTION_NAME' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52815 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-03 01:05:02 UTC --- Fix is obvious but should GCC be smart enough to ignore code code after gcc_unreachable? -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug target/52838] New: [x32] missed optimization for pointer return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52838 Bug #: 52838 Summary: [x32] missed optimization for pointer return value Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/52837] ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 --- Comment #3 from Matt Godbolt 2012-04-02 22:52:26 UTC --- Created attachment 27072 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27072 Minimal reproducible test case $ /site/apps/gcc-4.7.0-drw.2/bin/gcc -c gcc-4.7-ice-demangle.cc gcc-4

[Bug c++/52837] ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 --- Comment #2 from Matt Godbolt 2012-04-02 22:51:14 UTC --- After a little more research, I've managed to get a 4-line reproduction case. (See attached). I also confirmed this code compiles without error on GCC4.5 and GCC4.6.

[Bug c++/52837] ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 --- Comment #1 from Matt Godbolt 2012-04-02 22:17:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27071 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27071 This is the .ii file that reproduces the problem. (gzipped to get past upload limitations) (attempt a

[Bug c++/52837] New: ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 Bug #: 52837 Summary: ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #37 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-02 22:05:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > I know some of us use tee and that disables termainal detection code usually. Right, so then you don't get the caret by default. You can still enable it

[Bug target/52836] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at config/arm/arm.c:13084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52836 --- Comment #1 from Meador Inge 2012-04-02 20:54:30 UTC --- Created attachment 27070 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27070 Reproduction case

[Bug target/52836] New: internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at config/arm/arm.c:13084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52836 Bug #: 52836 Summary: internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at config/arm/arm.c:13084 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug fortran/52724] Internal read with character(kind=4) data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-04-02 19:38:31 UTC --- Created attachment 27069 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27069 gcc48-pr52835.patch Untested fix. Ignoring failures from compute_*loop can't be right.

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug libffi/52497] libffi doesn't build on powerpc64-linux after latest upstream merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52497 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libffi/52497] libffi doesn't build on powerpc64-linux after latest upstream merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52497 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-04-02 18:31:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Dup of PR52671 ? Yes. Gcc-4.8 from today is fine. Gcc-4.7 release fails. Haven't tried the gcc-4.7 branch, but it seems obvious.

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 --- Comment #3 from Arnaud Desitter 2012-04-02 17:54:06 UTC --- Additionally: >cat xxx.f SUBROUTINE XXX(RES,ALP,REN,NN ) DIMENSION ALP(NN),REN (NN),RES (NN) DO IP = 1,NN REN(IP) = 0.0 ALP(IP) = 0.0 CAL

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #36 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2012-04-02 17:35:59 UTC --- I know some of us use tee and that disables termainal detection code usually. Or output to a file and then use tail -f. So please don't do that. It would confuse lots of us

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #35 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-02 17:19:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #32) > > > > Of course this may fail in some cases, like non-ANSI input, and not > > preprocessing, but it will work in 99% of

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #34 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-02 17:18:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > > Of course this may fail in some cases, like non-ANSI input, and not > preprocessing, but it will work in 99% of the cases. In any case, it is not

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #33 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-02 17:15:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #31) > > Well, that is reassuring. Then, will we still pretty-print expressions in > > diagnostics once we have the caret? > >

[Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977 regressions (libjava failures)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe 2012-04-02 17:13:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > e.g. AFAICT, although darwin defines JCR_SECTION_NAME, there is no crt > machinery to deal with it [darwin has it's own crt code] JFTR (in case anyone else ha

[Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug libstdc++/52822] [C++11] stable_partition destroys sequence due to inappropriate self-move-assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2012-04-02 16:41:41 UTC --- Sounds good. Will send the patches to the list, probably tomorrow. Thanks!

[Bug fortran/52774] Derived-type assignment: check required to prevent double deallocation of allocatable component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52774 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977 regressions (libjava failures)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe 2012-04-02 16:29:25 UTC --- Rainer's commit (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-04/msg00031.html) fixes this for i686-darwin9.

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-04-02 16:18:47 UTC --- r183622 is OK r183649 miscompiles the code.

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #32 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-02 15:57:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > Well, that is reassuring. Then, will we still pretty-print expressions in > diagnostics once we have the caret? No, there should be no need to. > Is ther

[Bug fortran/52835] New: Incorrect code generated by gfortran 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 Bug #: 52835 Summary: Incorrect code generated by gfortran 4.7.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority

[Bug middle-end/52756] [4.8 Regression] 255.vortex in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52756 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-02 15:13:50 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 2 15:13:45 2012 New Revision: 186085 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186085 Log: 2012-04-02 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug middle-end/52756] [4.8 Regression] 255.vortex in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52756 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-02 14:05:31 UTC --- With that patch gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-2.c regresses as we do not perform the threading through the header edge anymore. Note that using thread_block (header, true); for th

[Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug regression/52834] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 Bug #: 52834 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/52800] [4.8 Regression] eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in cfgloop .

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-02 12:00:34 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 2 12:00:30 2012 New Revision: 186081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186081 Log: 2012-04-02 Richard Guenther PR rtl-opt

[Bug rtl-optimization/52803] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ira, at ira.c:3616 with -fno-move-loop-invariants on almost any code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52803 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/52800] [4.8 Regression] eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in cfgloop .

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52803] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ira, at ira.c:3616 with -fno-move-loop-invariants on almost any code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52803 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-02 11:59:51 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 2 11:59:47 2012 New Revision: 186080 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186080 Log: 2012-04-02 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug middle-end/52756] [4.8 Regression] 255.vortex in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52756 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-02 11:38:59 UTC --- It doesn't work, as we expect loop_latch_edge () to work during further threading. It also does not work because we miss some threadings and thus hit the assert that e->aux is NULL

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||52756 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guen

[Bug middle-end/52800] [4.8 Regression] eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in cfgloop .

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52832] ASSOCIATE construct with proc-pointer selector is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52832 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 Grzegorz Wierzowiecki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-02 10:12:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > following code is based on artihmetic overflow assumption (after overflow we > gen <0 number on x86 and x86_64): Bad assumption, overflow is undefined be

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #4 from Grzegorz Wierzowiecki 2012-04-02 10:11:32 UTC --- Created attachment 27067 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27067 compiler flags enabled by -O2

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #3 from Grzegorz Wierzowiecki 2012-04-02 10:11:02 UTC --- Created attachment 27066 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27066 compiler flags enabled by -O1

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #2 from Grzegorz Wierzowiecki 2012-04-02 10:09:48 UTC --- Created attachment 27065 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27065 overflow_loop-O2.s - assembly after -O2

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #1 from Grzegorz Wierzowiecki 2012-04-02 10:09:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27064 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27064 overflow_loop-O1.s - Assembly after -O1

[Bug c++/52833] New: -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 Bug #: 52833 Summary: -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status:

[Bug fortran/52832] New: ASSOCIATE construct with proc-pointer selector is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52832 Bug #: 52832 Summary: ASSOCIATE construct with proc-pointer selector is rejected Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/52729] Symbol has no implicit type in SELECT TYPE block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52729 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/52831] extract_bit_field_1: issue when str_rtx unsafe from target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52831 --- Comment #1 from Aurelien Buhrig 2012-04-02 09:42:28 UTC --- Created attachment 27062 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27062 Fix

[Bug middle-end/52831] New: extract_bit_field_1: issue when str_rtx unsafe from target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52831 Bug #: 52831 Summary: extract_bit_field_1: issue when str_rtx unsafe from target Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52803] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ira, at ira.c:3616 with -fno-move-loop-invariants on almost any code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52803 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/52793] [4.8 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52793 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977 regressions (libjava failures)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guen

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52814] Internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52814 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/52822] [C++11] stable_partition destroys sequence due to inappropriate self-move-assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug middle-end/52821] [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52821 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/40942] GCC accepts code that Comeau and MSVC deems invalid.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40942 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/40942] GCC accepts code that Comeau and MSVC deems invalid.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40942 --- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-04-02 08:51:30 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Mon Apr 2 08:51:26 2012 New Revision: 186067 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186067 Log: PR c++/40942 - Failure of template specialization

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #31 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-02 08:16:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #26) > > The caret is not a solution to this problem, because what Gabriel wants is > > to > > not reconstruct expressions ONLY

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 --- Comment #4 from Mat Cross 2012-04-02 08:03:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Can you maybe check on trunk/4.7.0 ? I've just tried with $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.7.1 20120331 (prerelease) $ gfortran -c -Wunused-parameter

[Bug c++/9050] [DR 147] Can't explicitly specialize C++ constructor templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050 --- Comment #16 from Johannes Schaub 2012-04-02 07:43:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Good point, I've pointed out the problem with the proposed resolution. Note that we currently have http://www.open-std.org

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-02 07:40:32 UTC --- This may have been fixed with the fix for PR 48847. Can you maybe check on trunk/4.7.0 ?

[Bug c/52825] incorrect message for "incompatible pointer type" with extra "struct" for a typedeffed struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52825 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/52830] New: ICE: "canonical types differ for identity types ..." when attempting SFINAE with member type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 Bug #: 52830 Summary: ICE: "canonical types differ for identity types ..." when attempting SFINAE with member type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0