http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53910
Bug #: 53910
Summary: use -std=c++11 by default
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2012-07-10 06:36:03
UTC ---
*-darwin8 assumes ppc64 multilib, try --disable-multilib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53909
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53909
--- Comment #1 from Tudor Bosman 2012-07-10 03:33:51 UTC
---
Appears fixed in gcc 4.7.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53909
Bug #: 53909
Summary: internal compiler error: in gimplify_init_ctor_eval,
at gimplify.c:3560
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
Bug #: 53908
Summary: [4.7 Regression] csa removes needed memory load
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #5 from Daryle Walker 2012-07-10
01:34:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 27767
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27767
The log from the failed make described in Comment 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #4 from Daryle Walker 2012-07-10
01:32:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #0)
> > > (Should I try building GCC 4.7.1 straight from you guys, without going
> > > through
> > > MacPo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53733
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53733
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-10
00:05:53 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 10 00:05:50 2012
New Revision: 189398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189398
Log:
DR 1402
PR c++/53733
* cp-tree.h (FNDEC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53733
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-10
00:03:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 10 00:03:23 2012
New Revision: 189396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189396
Log:
DR 1402
PR c++/53733
* cp-tree.h (FNDEC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53907
Bug #: 53907
Summary: gcc uses unaligned load when aligned load was
requested
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-09 22:39:29
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Jul 9 22:39:25 2012
New Revision: 189394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189394
Log:
PR target/53886
* config/sh/sh.c (sequence_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53906
--- Comment #2 from cascaval at qualcomm dot com 2012-07-09 22:29:14 UTC ---
> apt-cache show libc6-dev
Package: libc6-dev
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 9544
Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers
Architecture: armel
Source: eglib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH, wrong-code
Component|libstdc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771
--- Comment #7 from Janis Johnson 2012-07-09
22:10:46 UTC ---
Author: janis
Date: Mon Jul 9 22:10:40 2012
New Revision: 189393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189393
Log:
Backport from mainline.
2012-06-28 Janis J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53906
Bug #: 53906
Summary: Runtime crash on ARM linux when using std::thread
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53905
Bug #: 53905
Summary: -Wformat-nonliteral gives false positives with
__attribute__((format(NSString,...)))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53733
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-07-09
20:49:31 UTC ---
Jason, this is the PR/DR we were talking about.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #29 from jimis 2012-07-09 19:57:22 UTC ---
Thanks guys, sent to gcc-patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg00345.html
pbase complex-sign-mul.c -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase
complex-sign-mul -g -O3 -std=gnu99 -version -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -o
/tmp/ccd2Ykcd.s
==13911==
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.0 20120709 (experimental) [trunk revision 157801]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53283
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe 2012-07-09 19:22:03
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Jul 9 19:21:59 2012
New Revision: 189391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189391
Log:
PR target/53283
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-09
18:53:39 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Mon Jul 9 18:53:35 2012
New Revision: 189389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189389
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/53887
* tree-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe 2012-07-09 17:37:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> > Passed testing on i386, bootstrapped fine on x86_64 multilib, I'd appreciate
> > testing on 32-bit multilib platform.
>
> I've just completed a regtest wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53901
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++11] std::atomic |[C++11] std::atomic
|fai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-07-09 16:28:24 UTC ---
> Passed testing on i386, bootstrapped fine on x86_64 multilib, I'd appreciate
> testing on 32-bit multilib platform.
I've just completed a regtest with your patc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53900
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-09
16:18:58 UTC ---
Well, I suggest you instead do
struct Foo
{
float array[4];
Foo()
{
std::cout << array << "\n";
// check the object is really aligned
if (std::ptrdiff_t(array) &
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-09
16:17:04 UTC ---
See Bug 53901
I think GCC is correct about that too, the tagged_ptr class template should
declare its default constructor and destructor to be noexcept in C++11 mode.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53903
Bug #: 53903
Summary: [C++11] Incompatible exception-specification allowed
if member explicitly-defaulted after first declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Versio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53900
--- Comment #2 from Gael Guennebaud
2012-07-09 16:12:07 UTC ---
The problem is that it is not guaranteed to be effectively aligned, and it is
nice to be able to detect when this happens to either abort with a clear
message, trigger an exception,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
Bug #: 53902
Summary: make install fails on SunOS 5.11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899
--- Comment #5 from Neil Nelson 2012-07-09
16:06:11 UTC ---
Jonathan, (redi at gcc dot gnu.org )
I installed g++-4.7 and obtained a good improvement over the prior
results with the following output
boost_lockfree/libs/lockfree/test$ g++-4.7 -s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53901
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-09
15:56:33 UTC ---
Actually I'm not sure the testcase is valid.
Defining the functions as defaulted outside the class does allow it to compile,
but I think that might be a G++ bug. I'll get clarifica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763
--- Comment #35 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-09
15:39:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #31)
> Just so you know, the proposed patch would break glibc builds. Here's a
> reduced test case that reproduces an issue compil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53547
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53901
Bug #: 53901
Summary: [C++11] std::atomic fails for type without trivial
default constructor and trivial destructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53900
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763
Daniel Schepler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dschepler at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53900
Bug #: 53900
Summary: Too optimistic on a alignment assert
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36797
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-09
14:45:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The lockfree code is invalid anyway because
> boost::lockfree::detail::tagged_ptr
> doesn't have a trivial default constructor, so it can't be used with
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899
--- Comment #3 from Neil Nelson 2012-07-09
14:34:18 UTC ---
Redi,
Thank you for your very quick and detailed responses. Looks like I have
some work to do on my end. I will copy this to the boost lockfree author.
Neil
On 07/09/2012 08:30 AM, r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-09
14:30:28 UTC ---
The lockfree code is invalid anyway because boost::lockfree::detail::tagged_ptr
doesn't have a trivial default constructor, so it can't be used with
std::atomic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nnelson at infowest dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53882
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-09
14:11:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jul 9 14:11:33 2012
New Revision: 189388
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189388
Log:
PR c++/53882
* tree.c (type_contains_placeh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53882
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-09
14:11:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jul 9 14:11:01 2012
New Revision: 189386
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189386
Log:
PR c++/53882
* tree.c (type_contains_placeh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53826
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-09
14:11:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jul 9 14:11:16 2012
New Revision: 189387
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189387
Log:
PR c++/53826
* tree.c (build_zero_cst): Han
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53882
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-09
14:11:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jul 9 14:11:01 2012
New Revision: 189386
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189386
Log:
PR c++/53882
* tree.c (type_contains_placeh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-07-09
13:59:58 UTC ---
(If
> I had time to to that, I wouldn't have put it on the wishlist but created a
> patch.)
I have thought a lot how to attract more and new developers to GCC who will be
willin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899
Bug #: 53899
Summary: [C++0x] undefined reference to
std::atomichttp://tim.klingt.org/boost_lockfree.tar.gz
The following program when compiled and executed from libs/lockfree/test
(including the other r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53283
--- Comment #12 from Sean McGovern 2012-07-09
13:32:25 UTC ---
This was OK'ed on the ML but not committed yet?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53895
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-09 13:15:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> yes it does
> ld -v
> GNU ld version 2.22.52.0.1-10.fc17 20120131
> [innocent@pcphsftkepler bugs48]$ c++ thread.cpp -pthread -std=gnu++0x -O2
> -flto
> -Wl,-v
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-09 12:44:48 UTC ---
Here is a reduced test case for the ICE (4.8 regression):
IMPLICIT NONE
TYPE :: individual
REAL, DIMENSION(:), ALLOCATABLE :: genes
END TYPE
CLASS(individual),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53898
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53898
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53898
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-09
12:40:56 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 9 12:40:51 2012
New Revision: 189374
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189374
Log:
2012-07-09 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53895
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-07-09 12:20:41 UTC ---
yes it does
ld -v
GNU ld version 2.22.52.0.1-10.fc17 20120131
[innocent@pcphsftkepler bugs48]$ c++ thread.cpp -pthread -std=gnu++0x -O2 -flto
-Wl,-v
collect2 version 4.8.0 2012062
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53885
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53898
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #2 from Tim Ruehsen 2012-07-09 11:50:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Obvious endless loops could be reported, e.g. if the loop condition doesn't
> > change and the loop can't be left otherwise.
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53898
Bug #: 53898
Summary: [4.8 regression] bootstrap failure:
graphite-optimize-isl.c: ISO C forbids an empty
translation unit
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #26 from jimis 2012-07-09 10:06:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 27765
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27765
fprint_w reinstated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
jimis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #25 from jimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #12 from jimis 2012-07-09 09:52:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> bug-libt...@gnu.org
FWIW I had sent this but got no reply:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2011-08/msg3.html
Maybe we should open this or the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48109
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe 2012-07-09 08:43:33
UTC ---
this is now fixed on trunk by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=188793
We will have to consider whether it is a reasonable back-port (at least to
4.7). Although it tou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53875
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53884
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53890
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-09
08:39:18 UTC ---
I'm pretty sure we have duplicates for this case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53895
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53897
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-09
08:17:47 UTC ---
This is like including /dev/console under UNIX (GNU/Linux).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53897
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53897
Bug #: 53897
Summary: one line of include stuck the compiler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53896
Bug #: 53896
Summary: nonreturning function suggested as 'pure' candidate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
78 matches
Mail list logo
