http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
Bug #: 55571
Summary: [4.6.4 regression] PR48076 fix broke bootstrap on
armv5tel-linux-gnueabi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-03
08:42:51 UTC ---
> The last time I built and tested the compiler on IA-64, the C testsuite
> results
> were rather bad, especially at -O3.
I just retried and there are still a bunch of C/C++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-03
08:54:26 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 3 08:54:18 2012
New Revision: 194075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194075
Log:
2012-11-03 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55475
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-03
08:56:22 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 3 08:56:11 2012
New Revision: 194076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194076
Log:
2012-12-03 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 09:00:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Author: burnus
> Date: Mon Dec 3 08:54:18 2012
> New Revision: 194075
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194075
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|Undefin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55475
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek 2012-12-03
10:07:22 UTC ---
That's because in 4.8/4.7 we introduced
c-family/c-common.c:check_user_alignment which contains:
if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (align))
|| TREE_CODE (align) != INTEGE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55572
Bug #: 55572
Summary: -fobjc-direct-dispatch is not really implemented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2012-12-03
10:33:58 UTC ---
In fact, we of course check for that, we should just switch the expressions in
the if. Testing a fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
Bug #: 55573
Summary: [4.8 ICE] internal compiler error: in
adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6454
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in adjust_temp_type, at |[4.8 Regression] ICE in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||ia64-*-*
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-03
12:51:45 UTC ---
I knew that a PR using "marshalling" couldn't be right ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2012-12-03
13:02:10 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Dec 3 13:02:04 2012
New Revision: 194083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194083
Log:
Fix PR c/55570.
Added:
trunk/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-03
13:06:14 UTC ---
--- semantics.c.jj12012-11-23 00:14:40.0 +0100
+++ semantics.c2012-12-03 14:02:54.407690163 +0100
@@ -6451,6 +6451,14 @@ adjust_temp_type (tree type, tree temp)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek 2012-12-03
13:10:33 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Dec 3 13:10:18 2012
New Revision: 194084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194084
Log:
Fix PR c/55570.
Added:
branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55415
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55448
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kretz at kde dot org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-12-03
13:37:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> OK, but the question is why this rule is invoked during the gnattools build?
> Moreover, why does s-avr-mlib need to be rebuilt at this point si
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-03 13:38:19
UTC ---
Thanks Jakub, each time I introduce a regression, you fix it before I even have
time to read the PR :-)
I haven't looked into it yet, but would changing the assert to scalarish_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-12-03 13:54:14 UTC ---
Thanks for the quick fix
could you please verify why this other constructor
constexpr Rot3( T xx, T xy, T xz, T yx, T yy, T yz, T zx, T zy, T zz) :
axis{ (Vec){xx,xy,xz,0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7 Regression] Bytemark
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574
Bug #: 55574
Summary: c binding access to c_ptr type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55575
Bug #: 55575
Summary: [4.8 Regression] make: *** No rule to make target
`strip'. Stop.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-12-03 14:29:54 UTC ---
a bit of cross posting with PR55573] sorry
this
typedef float __attribute__( ( vector_size( 4*sizeof(float) ) ) ) V4;
constexpr V4 build(float x,float y, float z) { return (V4)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573
--- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-12-03 14:32:06 UTC ---
comment 7 reduced to
typedef float __attribute__( ( vector_size( 4*sizeof(float) ) ) ) V4;
constexpr V4 build(float x,float y, float z) { return (V4){x,y,z,0};}
constexpr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55575
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-03
14:35:35 UTC ---
> I don't know anything about the gnat build system and when I build avr-gcc I
> configure for C/C++.
>
> What's odd is that even if GCC is only configured for C/C++, I get m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55575
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-12-03
14:39:19 UTC ---
Eric has already "upgraded" this bug report to a 4.6/4.7/4.8 regression, but
I'd like to add that I now got a very similar error with 4.8-20121202:
/mnt/scratch/objdir48/.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2012-12-03
14:42:46 UTC ---
Ok, instead of rewriting this mess during stage3 I'll re-instantiate the
failure path (but consistently) of expression insertion so that in this case
we defer to a further inse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.7.3, 4.8.0
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-03 14:53:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> typedef float __attribute__( ( vector_size( 4*sizeof(float) ) ) ) V4;
> constexpr V4 build(float x,float y, float z) { return (V4){x,y,z,0};}
> constexpr V4 x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54877
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55452
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-03
15:18:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 3 15:18:49 2012
New Revision: 194095
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194095
Log:
PR testsuite/55452
* gfortran.d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-03 15:19:33
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 193241:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-11/msg00188.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55452
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ppc32 e500mc|powerpc-*-linux e500mc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576
Bug #: 55576
Summary: Fails to compile a call to template member function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53636
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|2012-07-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54127
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54259
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54653
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54896
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Blocks|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54896
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47344
Target Milestone|4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #7 from Richard
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo