[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2008-12-08 19:34:48 |2013-01-21 19:34:48

[Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 Bug #: 56063 Summary: last reconfirmed : now Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority:

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #24 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-21 09:11:22 UTC --- I've tried adding the offset instead of OR-ing it and got 2%-5% slowdown and same code size increase on SPEC on x86_64 (using fresh clang -02). So, yes, if we want to keep

[Bug web/56063] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-21 10:01:40 UTC --- The problem is that aggregate_value_p can rely on that invoke_set_current_function_hook has already been called which my patch foolishly moved below it. I'm preparing a patch.

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-21 10:07:02 UTC --- > --- Comment #28 from Alexandre Oliva 2013-01-18 > 11:08:06 UTC --- > Is the mem-clobbering compile-time regression still noticeable after the > recent

[Bug go/54507] libgo testsuite does not timeout compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54507 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-21 10:09:18 UTC --- > --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2013-01-18 > 11:08:43 UTC --- > FYI, var-tracking just got a patch that could make this better. As reported in PR d

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-01-21 10:15:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Neither insn 24/145 nor insn 28 move through insn 17. The two UNSPEC 44 insn > (LC..2,, LCM..2) are inputs to insn 17. The pseudos are moved in

[Bug target/56058] GCC arm-none-eabi build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058 --- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2013-01-21 10:45:09 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Mon Jan 21 10:45:05 2013 New Revision: 195332 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195332 Log: Fix up wrong marvell-pj4.md file

[Bug c++/56009] Nested global destruction semantics not working (mingw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/56009] Nested global destruction semantics not working (mingw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug driver/56062] Enhance -fuse-ld= option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56062 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21 11:13:44 UTC --- Yes, but why? How many linkers do you have in a single directory? If you have different veersions of binutils in differnt paths then use -B to find them. The difficulty w

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-21 11:14:43 UTC --- In fact, the nicest solution would be to investigate how much of Ian's document is already duplicated in the GNU binutils sources: http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/au

[Bug c/56048] -Werror=format=2 does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56048 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||LpSolit at netscape dot

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29211|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 --- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-01-21 12:20:04 UTC --- You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who remember dates such as "that was

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21 12:31:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you > already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people wh

[Bug c/56048] -Werror=format=2 does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56048 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/55237] Please implement gcc.gnu.org/r123456 URL shorts for fast SVN revision access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||LpSolit at netscape dot net --- C

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21 12:53:09 UTC --- I've tried to reproduce this with a cross compiler (without cross binutils) on x86_64-linux host, but it ICEs elsewhere: ../configure --target powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.1 --disable-

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21 13:03:03 UTC --- Yeah, if this ever worked, it was by pure accident. OpenMP 3.1 vs. Fortran OOP is simply undefined territory, gfortran won't run e.g. any constructors/destructors of privatized

[Bug tree-optimization/56064] New: Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064 Bug #: 56064 Summary: Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimiza

[Bug c++/56065] New: Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065 Bug #: 56065 Summary: Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/56065] Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21 13:23:18 UTC --- dup of PR 55663 ?

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #13 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-01-21 13:23:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > I've tried to reproduce this with a cross compiler (without cross binutils) on > x86_64-linux host, but it ICEs elsewhere: > > ../configure

[Bug tree-optimization/56034] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (invalid PHI argument) with -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56034 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/56035] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1581 (loop n’s header does not belong directly to it !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority

[Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56065] Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55663] [C++11] Alias template combined with constexpr function is considered non-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucdanton at free dot fr --- Co

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/51447] [4.6/4.7 Regression] global register variable definition incorrectly removed as dead code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2013-01-21 14:52:35 UTC --- The failure in comment 16 appears to be PR51784.

[Bug c++/56066] New: g++ generates strong symbols conflicting with C99 extern inline code on Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56066 Bug #: 56066 Summary: g++ generates strong symbols conflicting with C99 extern inline code on Windows Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-21 15:13:38 UTC --- Created attachment 29237 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29237 auto-host.h for AIX 7.1

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-21 15:16:04 UTC --- libbacktrace only supports ELF file format and AIX does not use ELF, so libbacktrace will not work on AIX. Also, you patch called libbacktrace unilaterally, even without any

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21 15:25:00 UTC --- Using your auto-host.h (with the exception of HAVE_DECL_BASENAME - clearly host rather than target thing) with i686-linux -> powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0 cross I still get the same I

[Bug c++/56067] New: Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067 Bug #: 56067 Summary: Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:34:27 UTC --- Hi, ich antworte jetzt mal privat, dann müssen wir unsere Privatgespräche nicht auf Bugzilla führen ;) >>> Janus, long time no see! XD >> Right! It's been a while since y

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-21 15:37:48 UTC --- AIX 5.3 does not support TLS, so there are pieces not implemented in config/rs6000/aix53.h. Jakub's configuration probably will not work. Also, GNU Binutils does not support

[Bug c++/56067] Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Stat

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-21 15:41:24 UTC --- Probably something like Index: rs6000.c === --- rs6000.c(revision 195319) +++ rs6000.c(working copy

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21 15:54:08 UTC --- Indeed, with #c18 patch I can reproduce the ICE. Andrey, can you try that too? On x86_64-linux, do for current trunk + #c18 patch applied: mkdir obj cd obj ../configure --ta

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-21 17:02:18 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 21 17:02:08 2013 New Revision: 195339 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195339 Log: 2013-01-21 Martin Jambor

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-21 17:07:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you > > already know the exact date. The calenda

[Bug c/56068] New: -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 Bug #: 56068 Summary: -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #1 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:08:47 UTC --- Created attachment 29239 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29239 gcc -dM -E - -march=native

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-21 17:09:27 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 21 17:09:22 2013 New Revision: 195340 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195340 Log: 2013-01-21 Martin Jambor

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #2 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:10:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29240 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29240 diff of defines

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #3 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:12:15 UTC --- mockbuild@centos6-64bit-builder ~/build/BUILD/tmp (mock-chroot) $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 13

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #4 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:13:25 UTC --- Created attachment 29241 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29241 gcc -v test.c output

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #5 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:14:05 UTC --- Created attachment 29242 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29242 gcc test.c -march=native -v

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-21 17:14:54 UTC --- > sse4a There is the issue I think.

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-21 17:17:19 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 21 17:16:57 2013 New Revision: 195341 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195341 Log: 2013-01-21 Martin Jambor PR

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UN

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21 17:20:11 UTC --- Created attachment 29243 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29243 gcc48-pr56052.patch Anyway, the following patch fixes the ICE, by making the artificial var

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #8 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:26:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Please try a newer version of GCC, 4.4 is no longer supported. Also since > which version is the oldest supported version, I will use that version for

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 --- Comment #14 from Jürgen Reuter 2013-01-21 17:28:12 UTC --- On Monday 21 January 2013 16:34:27 you wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 > > --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:34:27 UTC --- > Hi,

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-21 17:28:19 UTC --- I can reproduce with a gcc-4.7-20130119 cross from x86_64-linux to ppc-linux, but not with gcc-4.8-20130120. So possibly fixed on trunk.

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21 17:30:38 UTC --- What is the illegal instruction? What version of glibc are you using? I debugged a very similar problem last week where GCC was generating vmovsd on a host without AVX suppo

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-01-21 17:31:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Indeed, with #c18 patch I can reproduce the ICE. Andrey, can you try that > too? Sure, will do, I'll be out of office on Tuesday though. Th

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21 17:32:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Using -mno-avx (or replacing -march=cirei7) worked for me. Bah, that should be "replacing -march=native with -march=corei7" My problem was wit

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/56069] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] RA pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069 Bug #: 56069 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] RA pessimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimiza

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #11 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 17:42:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Using -mno-avx (or replacing -march=cirei7) worked for me. > Bah, that should be "replacing -march=native with -march=c

[Bug rtl-optimization/56023] [4.6 Regression]: [alpha] -fcompare-debug failure due to sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023 --- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:51:38 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jan 21 17:51:23 2013 New Revision: 195342 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195342 Log: PR rtl-optimization/56023

[Bug tree-optimization/56051] Wrong expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21 17:55:46 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 21 17:55:34 2013 New Revision: 195343 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195343 Log: PR tree-optimization/56051 * fo

[Bug rtl-optimization/56023] [4.6 Regression]: [alpha] -fcompare-debug failure due to sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:59:34 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jan 21 17:59:28 2013 New Revision: 195344 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195344 Log: PR rtl-optimization/56023

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-21 18:00:06 UTC --- Let me run a bisection first...

[Bug tree-optimization/56051] Wrong expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-21 18:01:59 UTC --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug rtl-optimization/56023] [4.6 Regression]: [alpha] -fcompare-debug failure due to sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 18:03:07 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jan 21 18:02:57 2013 New Revision: 195345 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195345 Log: PR rtl-optimization/56023

[Bug rtl-optimization/56023] [4.6 Regression]: [alpha] -fcompare-debug failure due to sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/54114] [4.8/4.9 Regression] variable-tracking performance regression from 4.8-20120610 to 4.8-20120701

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |debug Target Milestone|4.8.0

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21 19:14:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6... Thanks for checking. See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC for the foolproof way to do b

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-21 19:30:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Created attachment 29221 [details] > > Fix for this PR and PR 47517 > > I confirm for this PR. However while the original code of PR 47517 executes

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-21 19:31:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6... > > Thanks for checking. See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC

[Bug fortran/55919] [4.8 Regression] Bogus warning with -J directory/

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55919 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2013-01-21 19:34:57 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Jan 21 19:34:49 2013 New Revision: 195348 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195348 Log: 2013-01-21 Thomas Koenig PR

[Bug fortran/55919] [4.8 Regression] Bogus warning with -J directory/

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55919 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-21 19:58:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > > Maybe GCC could work around it by checking both flags in the AVX detection > > logic. > > Recent 4.6+ does. Please see driver-i386.c around l

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #15 from Jason Pyeron 2013-01-21 20:14:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6... > ... > If that prints 0 for OSXSAVE and non-zero for AVX then it's

[Bug c++/56059] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SIGSEGV on invalid C++11 code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug bootstrap/56070] New: genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070 Bug #: 56070 Summary: genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug bootstrap/56070] genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070 --- Comment #1 from Denis Onischenko 2013-01-21 20:53:29 UTC --- Created attachment 29244 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29244 output

[Bug bootstrap/56070] genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56058] GCC arm-none-eabi build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denis.onischenko at gmail

[Bug target/56058] GCC arm-none-eabi build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56069] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] RA pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-01-21 21:56:02 UTC --- LRA does not generate any reloads (additional insns). So I don't think it is LRA problem. I've checked reload. It generates the same code. Although I guess, it is IRA pr

[Bug c++/56071] New: noexcept with template and private ctor fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 Bug #: 56071 Summary: noexcept with template and private ctor fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 --- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-01-21 22:20:33 UTC --- What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a "Now" link instead. I'm not sure that having both the calendar button and a "Now" link would be nice from a UX point of view

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-21 22:52:18 UTC --- This ICE was fixed for 4.8 by Alan Modra's "PR53914, rs6000 constraints and reload queries" fix in r189801. The ICE described in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-07/msg00142

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Known to work|

  1   2   >