[Bug java/58284] Compiling jvgenmain failes with lots of undefined reference errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284 --- Comment #1 from Winston Smith smith_winston_6079 at hotmail dot com --- The same happens if the build dir is not a symlink.

[Bug target/58278] visibility bug from #26905 still happens with the sparc64 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278 --- Comment #4 from Martin Husemann martin at netbsd dot org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) So what? What happens if conftest.cc doesn't fiddle with visibility at all? Sorry, I am not quite sure I understand what you are up

[Bug target/58278] visibility bug from #26905 still happens with the sparc64 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/58265] std::string move assignment should be noexcept

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/58265] [lwg/2063] std::string move assignment should be noexcept

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED

[Bug target/58278] visibility bug from #26905 still happens with the sparc64 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278 --- Comment #6 from Martin Husemann martin at netbsd dot org --- Ooops, my lack of x86 ABI knowledge strikes again. Indeed, visibility is properly expressed in the prologue, all is fine.

[Bug c/58287] New: internal compiler error: in c_builtin_function_ext_scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58287 Bug ID: 58287 Summary: internal compiler error: in c_builtin_function_ext_scope Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/58272] unnecessary vtables emission for pure abstract classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58272 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug c/58287] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in c_builtin_function_ext_scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58287 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- This is a duplicate of PR57848.

[Bug c/58287] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in c_builtin_function_ext_scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58287 Jacek Caban jacek at codeweavers dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57848] internal compiler error on builtin and '#pragma GCC target()' option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848 Jacek Caban jacek at codeweavers dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jacek at

[Bug c++/14932] [3.4/4.0 Regression] cannot use offsetof to get offsets of array elements in g++ 3.4.0 prerelease

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14932 --- Comment #15 from zhangjingwang at gmail dot com --- (In reply to zhangjingwang from comment #14) #include stdio.h #include stddef.h struct TestStruct { int array[13]; }; struct TempStruct { int index; }; int

[Bug middle-end/57748] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE when expanding assignment to unaligned zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748 --- Comment #23 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- Martin, one of the errors with strict volatile bitfields was with a structure like this. struct S0 { signed a : 7; unsigned b : 28; } __attribute__((packed)); here

[Bug fortran/35339] Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- note this *breaks bootstrap* for the normal language set. reduced testcase: int foo (int a, ...) { void *args; args = __builtin_apply_args (); return 0; }

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- bt #0 0x000100d7805a in internal_error (gmsgid=0x404 Address 0x404 out of bounds) at /src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1120 #1 0x000100d78266 in fancy_abort (file=Could not

[Bug ada/58239] [4.9 regression] pretty-print.c:789: undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/58288] New: Incorrect error message on malformed section attribute syntax.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58288 Bug ID: 58288 Summary: Incorrect error message on malformed section attribute syntax. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c/58288] Incorrect error message on malformed section attribute syntax.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58288 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Loader suckfish at ihug dot co.nz --- Whoops I meant not specified *correctly* rather than just not specified.

[Bug c/58288] Incorrect error message on malformed section attribute syntax.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58288 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Loader suckfish at ihug dot co.nz --- Created attachment 30735 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30735action=edit Patch Patch to change the error message attached. I also noticed another problem: we

[Bug bootstrap/58289] New: gcc/gengtype.c includes gcc/double-int.h, which uses C++ constructs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58289 Bug ID: 58289 Summary: gcc/gengtype.c includes gcc/double-int.h, which uses C++ constructs Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal