http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52651
Bug 52651 depends on bug 45586, which changed state.
Bug 45586 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088
Václav Zeman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088
Yuxuan Shui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yshuiv7 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60221
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60220
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
In GCC 4.9 (maybe even in 4.8), the loop is converted into memset by the time
the vectorizer gets around to the code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60221
Bug ID: 60221
Summary: gcc -fexceptions generates unnecessary cleanup code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60203
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Sun Feb 16 03:19:11 2014
New Revision: 207809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-02-15 Michael Meissner
PR target/60203
* config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60203
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60203
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Sun Feb 16 03:08:03 2014
New Revision: 207808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-02-15 Michael Meissner
PR target/60203
* config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60220
Bug ID: 60220
Summary: Vectorization : simple loop : fails to vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60219
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60219
Bug ID: 60219
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE invalid use of
variadic template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, ic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60217
Bug ID: 60217
Summary: Numerous ICEs involving wrong usage of __bases
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60218
Bug ID: 60218
Summary: [c++11] ICE using __bases for broken class hierarchy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60216
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60216
Bug ID: 60216
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] Trouble with deleted
template functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-inv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60215
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60215
Bug ID: 60215
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid bit-field size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to hubert.vansteenhuyse from comment #3)
> Of course it is, the example is merely a pseudo code to make clear what
> happened.
That's my point, pseudo-code is useless, if we can't reproduce the issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #3 from hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2)
> Your example is bogus: { and } don't match, main must return int, etc. If I
> fix it so it compiles, I don't see any crash.
Of course it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60214
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Pfau ---
Sorry, I forgot to add that this only happens if the test9_1 variable has got
an initializer. However this is almost always the case for GDC/D as we have
default initialization.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60214
Bug ID: 60214
Summary: Variables with same DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME are treated as
different variables
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On February 15, 2014 3:22:54 PM GMT+01:00, "sch...@linux-m68k.org"
wrote:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
>
>--- Comment #29 from Andreas Schwab ---
>In gcc <= 4.6 I'm unable t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The function "make_real" is not invoked directly, but through the type-bound
"a%real", which is called three times in the test case. Does the failure occur
already at the first one (i.e. line 67)? Ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:55:19 2014
New Revision: 207804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:55:19 2014
New Revision: 207804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:55:19 2014
New Revision: 207804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:53:07 2014
New Revision: 207803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:53:07 2014
New Revision: 207803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:53:07 2014
New Revision: 207803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60208
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:57:35 2014
New Revision: 207802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:57:35 2014
New Revision: 207802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:57:35 2014
New Revision: 207802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:48:48 2014
New Revision: 207801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:48:48 2014
New Revision: 207801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:48:48 2014
New Revision: 207801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #1 from hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be ---
struct A {
A *a[2];
A() { a[0] = 0; a[1] = 0; }
~A(){ if(a[0]) delete a[0]; if(a[1]) delete a[1];
}
void main(){
A *a = new A();
a->a[0] = new A();
a->a[1] = new A();
delete a; /
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
Bug ID: 60213
Summary: Weird crash when delete an object
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #29 from Andreas Schwab ---
In gcc <= 4.6 I'm unable to tell the compiler to consider the fp compare
trapping even with -ftrapping-math.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60212
Bug ID: 60212
Summary: no warning for unused variables
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60211
Bug ID: 60211
Summary: ICE with #pragma GCC ivdep and for-loop on global
scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59599
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Feb 15 11:48:41 2014
New Revision: 207799
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207799&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/59599
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anton at samba dot org
--- Comment #5 from A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59814
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60210
Bug ID: 60210
Summary: segfault when trying to use a const template using
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58675
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57935
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Sat Feb 15 10:49:55 2014
New Revision: 207798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207798&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58675
PR target/57935
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58675
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Sat Feb 15 10:49:55 2014
New Revision: 207798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207798&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58675
PR target/57935
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60092
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
As the standard doesn't specify that the value is undefined upon error and it
only specifies its contents upon successfull completion it implicitely says
that it retains the previous value on error.
I'd say
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60183
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Feb 15 09:54:52 2014
New Revision: 207797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/60183
* tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|richard.guenther at gmail dot com |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60207
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> But we didn't remove mode == TFmode check in construct_container.
This check is benign. classify_argument will return:
case TFmode:
classes[0] = X86_64_SSE_CL
59 matches
Mail list logo
