https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61306
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
I have a working patch that also pass bootstrap. I'll do a bit more testing and
post it for review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
--- Comment #4 from Hale Wang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> It seems that Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t is emitted from the C-family frontends only
> via config/arm/arm-c.c (as opposed to any other Tags). Probably because
> the option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61367
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61367
Bug ID: 61367
Summary: Annoying rtx cost information in middle end dumps on
arm/aarch64 targets
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721
--- Comment #30 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #29)
> This is related to PR 55142.
The problem I reported is worked around in the i386 backend though:
(insn:TI 19 18 22 3 (set (mem:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 0 ax [94])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61364
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61366
henricky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61366
Bug ID: 61366
Summary: erro
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
Assignee: unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth ---
fix confirmed when applied to gcc 4.9.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61365
Bug ID: 61365
Summary: e
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
Assignee: unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61364
Bug ID: 61364
Summary: Erro java 28
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
Assignee: unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #9)
> (In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #8)
> > Ok, should work now. Richard turned on lto processing in collect2, and we
> > need to run the post ld pass even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61349
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61348
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61363
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #8)
> Ok, should work now. Richard turned on lto processing in collect2, and we
> need to run the post ld pass even when doing lto.
Don't forget that we need this i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu May 29 23:20:39 2014
New Revision: 211067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/61352
* collect2.c (maybe_run_lto_and_relink): Be s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
r208320 (2014-03-04) generates the *.dSYM folder, r208478 (2014-03-11) does
not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61363
Bug ID: 61363
Summary: frftfrfgftg
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
Assignee: unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362
dgront at chem dot uw.edu.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.8.2
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362
Bug ID: 61362
Summary: g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2 does not compile
lambda with template
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721
--- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
This is related to PR 55142.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth ---
Also…
% gcc-fsf-4.9 -g -O1 --save-temps himenoBMTxpa.c -o himenoBMTxpa
…
% dsymutil ./himenoBMTxpa
% sudo fsf-gdb ./himenoBMTxpa
properly sets breakpoints and steps through the code generated by gcc 4.9.0 on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth ---
The problem here is that for some reason gcc 4.9.0 has stop running dsymutil as
it should on the created executables…
% gcc-fsf-4.8 -g -O1 himenoBMTxpa.c -v
…
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-mmacosx-version-min=10.8.5'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61356
--- Comment #2 from Piyush Chauhan ---
I have re-installed the gcc-4.7.3 without java build option just
gcc,g++,objc,FORTRAN packages. Now it's working fine.
I don't know what happened with gcj!
You can close the issue/bug, from my side no probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61361
Bug ID: 61361
Summary: gcc segfaults on SLES12 beta4 P8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
Bug ID: 61360
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: in lra_update_insn_recog_data,
at lra.c:1363 with -mtune=bdver4
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60834
--- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61359
Bug ID: 61359
Summary: GCC Bootstrap comparison failures on
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.23
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59498
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61358
Bug ID: 61358
Summary: Bogus "duplicate label" error after label used within
C++11 lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60969
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #30 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61357
Bug ID: 61357
Summary: Patch for 60969 causes MIPS regressions in register
allocation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61242
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56947
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu May 29 17:37:23 2014
New Revision: 211061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211061&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/61325
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu May 29 17:30:38 2014
New Revision: 211060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211060&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/61325
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57543
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #27)
> This patch breaks ILP32 with stack pointers.
> For this function:
> void f(int *a, int b, long long d) __attribute__((noinline,noclone));
> void f(int *a, int b, lon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61294
--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski ---
Hmm, now all of a sudden I don't seem to be able to reproduce this. Thanks for
your comments though. I play around if it re-appears. The problem was
compounded by the use of -Wl,--fatal-warnings so it wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61356
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Something has forcefully killed the compiler, probably due to OOM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61356
Bug ID: 61356
Summary: make error in gcj
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60834
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57543
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355
Bug ID: 61355
Summary: gcc doesn't normalize type in non-type template
parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60834
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu May 29 12:12:00 2014
New Revision: 211052
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211052&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/60834
* frontend-passes.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309
Kai-Uwe Eckhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kuehro at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61354
Bug ID: 61354
Summary: GCC bootstrap with LTO fails in trunk when built with
isl
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61098
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|http://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu May 29 08:15:40 2014
New Revision: 211046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-05-26 Uros Bizjak
PR t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4)
> > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4)
> (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> > > Richard,
> > >
> > > the build is still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> > Richard,
> >
> > the build is still broken, even after r211031.
> >
> > could you please have a look?
>
59 matches
Mail list logo
