[Bug tree-optimization/61684] New: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:238

2014-07-03 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684 Bug ID: 61684 Summary: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:238 Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/61682] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61682 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 33057 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33057&action=edit gcc410-pr61682.patch Ugh, there seem to be multiple bugs in wi::mul_internal. The one that affects this testcas

[Bug c++/61382] parameter pack expansion unexpected order

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61382 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug ipa/61160] [4.9/4.10 Regression] wrong code with -O3 (or ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge points to wrong declaration)

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'm seeing FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++98 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++11 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++1y execution test on x86_64-linux -m32, bot

[Bug tree-optimization/61684] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/61680] vectorization gives wrong answer for sandybridge target

2014-07-03 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/61674] The destructor of a simple class is removed by optimization

2014-07-03 Thread A.Finch at lancaster dot ac.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61674 --- Comment #6 from Alex Finch --- I guess I should have made that clear. The class has a static variable: static int fLockCount; which counts how many times an object of the class is created. If it is >1, then IsLocked() returns true. The dest

[Bug libitm/61594] ICE (assertion failure) in trans-mem.c

2014-07-03 Thread patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61594 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier --- Created attachment 33058 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33058&action=edit reduced testcase $ xgcc -Wall -Wextra -Wfatal-errors -O2 -fgnu-tm -S pr61594.c pr61594.c: In function ‘fn1’:

[Bug tree-optimization/61680] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] vectorization gives wrong answer for sandybridge target

2014-07-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/61684] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/61676] Allocatable string as type component causes compile time segmentation fault

2014-07-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61676 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/61685] New: Strange check in bid128_fma.c - rounding_correction()

2014-07-03 Thread maksqwe1 at ukr dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61685 Bug ID: 61685 Summary: Strange check in bid128_fma.c - rounding_correction() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/61680] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] vectorization gives wrong answer for sandybridge target

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- With just -mavx -O3 instead of -march=corei7-avx -O3, r165435 still works properly, r165436 ICEs, r165599 fixed the ICE, but the result is 10.0 already.

[Bug tree-optimization/61680] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] vectorization gives wrong answer for sandybridge target

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug tree-optimization/61680] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] vectorization gives wrong answer for sandybridge target

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- With -O3 -msse2 -fno-vect-cost-model it fails as well, so this isn't a problem in the AVX support, just that before AVX it wasn't considered profitable to vectorize it.

[Bug libitm/61594] ICE (assertion failure) in trans-mem.c

2014-07-03 Thread patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61594 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/58393] Please relax feature check for std::to_string and std::sto* for uClibc

2014-07-03 Thread nicolas.cavallari at lri dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58393 nicolas.cavallari at lri dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30800|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/61686] New: Incorrect check in comparison function range_entry_cmp() in tree_ssa_reassoc.c

2014-07-03 Thread maksqwe1 at ukr dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686 Bug ID: 61686 Summary: Incorrect check in comparison function range_entry_cmp() in tree_ssa_reassoc.c Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/61680] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] vectorization gives wrong answer for sandybridge target

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- C testcase: double v[4096][4]; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void bar (double p[][4]) { int i; double d = __builtin_sqrt (172.0); for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++) { if (p[i][0] != 6.0 || p[i][

[Bug c++/61687] New: [4.10 regression] -O PASS, -O2 report error

2014-07-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61687 Bug ID: 61687 Summary: [4.10 regression] -O PASS, -O2 report error Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/61680] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] vectorization gives wrong answer for sandybridge target

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the problem is that for the w array (in C testcase) we have first a partial group store (stores 3 out of 4 elements), then a group load (again, loads 3 out of 4 elements) and finally the last store of

[Bug fortran/61628] [MinGW)Write of medium sized or larger matrix fails without error message.

2014-07-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Summary|A program that re

[Bug preprocessor/60723] Line directives with incorrect system header flag

2014-07-03 Thread christophe.lyon at st dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723 --- Comment #19 from christophe.lyon at st dot com --- As discussed on IRC, I could test your patch, and the compiler now builds successfully.

[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/61203] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rvalue2.C FAILs with -O2 -fno-inline

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61203 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/61687] [4.10 regression] -O PASS, -O2 report error

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61687 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/61687] [4.10 regression] -O PASS, -O2 report error

2014-07-03 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61687 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/61688] New: [4.10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in ipa_binfo_from_known_type_jfunc

2014-07-03 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688 Bug ID: 61688 Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in ipa_binfo_from_known_type_jfunc Product:

[Bug c/61689] New: Assignment and Operator not working as intended.

2014-07-03 Thread wmichaelv at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689 Bug ID: 61689 Summary: Assignment and Operator not working as intended. Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/61689] Assignment and Operator not working as intended.

2014-07-03 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/61688] [4.10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in ipa_binfo_from_known_type_jfunc

2014-07-03 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/61688] [4.10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in ipa_binfo_from_known_type_jfunc

2014-07-03 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at suse dot cz --- Comment

[Bug c/61689] Assignment and Operator not working as intended.

2014-07-03 Thread wmichaelv at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689 --- Comment #2 from wmichaelv at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > The program has undefined behaviour; an assignment is not a sequence point. > See what -Wsequence-point says. According to the order operation, gr

[Bug middle-end/61677] False positive with -Wmaybe-uninitialized (test case included)

2014-07-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61677 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/61677] False positive with -Wmaybe-uninitialized (test case included)

2014-07-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61677 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Perhaps related to PR61409 or PR56574.

[Bug c/61689] Assignment and Operator not working as intended.

2014-07-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/61628] [MinGW)Write of medium sized or larger matrix fails without error message.

2014-07-03 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19 fr

[Bug c/61689] Assignment and Operator not working as intended.

2014-07-03 Thread wmichaelv at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689 --- Comment #4 from wmichaelv at hotmail dot com --- Ah, thank you. That clears it up. And my apology for my ignorant.

[Bug fortran/61628] [MinGW)Write of medium sized or larger matrix fails without error message.

2014-07-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug ipa/61688] [4.10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in ipa_binfo_from_known_type_jfunc

2014-07-03 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688 --- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield --- FWIW, it started happening for me at rev21

[Bug ipa/61688] [4.10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in ipa_binfo_from_known_type_jfunc

2014-07-03 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Ryan Mansfield from comment #3) > FWIW, it started happening for me at rev21 Yes, sorry I should have written: git blame points to r198088. I didn't bisect.

[Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken

2014-07-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Jerry, Looks as if you did the business? Maybe it should be closed. Thanks Paul

[Bug other/29842] [meta-bug] outstanding patches / issues from STMicroelectronics

2014-07-03 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #2) > For the -mrelax breakage, also see: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3298 Fixes for -mrelax have been posted by Renesas in 2009: https://so

[Bug c++/61690] New: aliasing base template class variable doesn't work in template derived class, when base class has two or more template parameters

2014-07-03 Thread siim.schults at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61690 Bug ID: 61690 Summary: aliasing base template class variable doesn't work in template derived class, when base class has two or more template parameters Product: gcc

[Bug preprocessor/58770] GCC very slow compiling with #pragma once

2014-07-03 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58770 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug c/59850] Support sparse-style pointer address spaces (type attributes)

2014-07-03 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850 --- Comment #26 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to PaX Team from comment #23) > some data points based on my experience with the 'checker' gcc plugin in PaX: Hi. Thanks for your reply. I didn't easily find a git repository holding the checker pl

[Bug c/59850] Support sparse-style pointer address spaces (type attributes)

2014-07-03 Thread josh at joshtriplett dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850 --- Comment #27 from Josh Triplett --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #21) > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #20) > > > BTW if you want to try it out I have a branch: > > https://github.com/tromey/gcc/tree/add-sparse-attributes > > T

[Bug c/59850] Support sparse-style pointer address spaces (type attributes)

2014-07-03 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850 --- Comment #28 from Tom Tromey --- > Please let me know what I can do to help complete this branch. I'd be happy > to help write the documentation, for instance. It's maybe not quite ready for testing. But if you want to give it a try and se

[Bug ipa/61688] [4.10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in ipa_binfo_from_known_type_jfunc

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/61306] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-03 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61306 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug c++/61691] New: [4.10 Regression] invalid use of incomplete type in Firefox

2014-07-03 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61691 Bug ID: 61691 Summary: [4.10 Regression] invalid use of incomplete type in Firefox Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug middle-end/61677] False positive with -Wmaybe-uninitialized (test case included)

2014-07-03 Thread josh at joshtriplett dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61677 Josh Triplett changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #33055|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/61691] [4.10 Regression] invalid use of incomplete type in Firefox

2014-07-03 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61691 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 33066 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33066&action=edit MediaPipeline.ii

[Bug tree-optimization/61682] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61682 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 3 22:11:21 2014 New Revision: 212273 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212273&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61682 * wide-int.cc (wi::mul_internal): Handl

[Bug tree-optimization/61682] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61682 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/61692] New: ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many parameters

2014-07-03 Thread gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692 Bug ID: 61692 Summary: ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many parameters Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/61691] [4.10 Regression] invalid use of incomplete type in Firefox

2014-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61691 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't see why you think this is invalid. ~DOMLocalMediaStream() calls ~nsRefPtr and ~nsRefPtr uses AudioNode::Release and AudioNode is an incomplete type.

[Bug sanitizer/61693] New: [asan] is not intercepting aligned_alloc

2014-07-03 Thread larsbj at gullik dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693 Bug ID: 61693 Summary: [asan] is not intercepting aligned_alloc Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitiz

[Bug rtl-optimization/61706] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61706 Bug ID: 61706 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61707] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61707 Bug ID: 61707 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61702] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61702 Bug ID: 61702 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61708] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61708 Bug ID: 61708 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61705] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61705 Bug ID: 61705 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61711] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61711 Bug ID: 61711 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61709] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61709 Bug ID: 61709 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61710] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61710 Bug ID: 61710 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61703] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61703 Bug ID: 61703 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61704] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61704 Bug ID: 61704 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] New: thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 Bug ID: 61712 Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

2014-07-03 Thread manjian2006 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #1 from linzj --- Created attachment 33068 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33068&action=edit source that crashes

[Bug tree-optimization/61306] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-03 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61306 --- Comment #11 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed. This is because the compiler will detect that the result of (a >> 8) depends on the sign of a and thus prevent the optimization. Before this check incorrect code could be generated. O

[Bug target/61713] New: 4.9 ICE when building c++ code with atomic functions for thumb1 target

2014-07-03 Thread tony.wang at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61713 Bug ID: 61713 Summary: 4.9 ICE when building c++ code with atomic functions for thumb1 target Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/61573] [4.10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building Linux kernel

2014-07-03 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/61693] [asan] is not intercepting aligned_alloc

2014-07-03 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693 Kostya Serebryany changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|