https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63805
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
I have similar error in LTO/x86_64, but stack is slightly different.
gcc-trunk r218991, binutils-trunk current
g++ -flto -o xx [6 files]. I'll try to reduce testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64320
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63363
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64359
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63363
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also it seems that polymorphic arguments to KIND are currently not rejected:
class(*), allocatable ::c
PRINT *, KIND(c)
END
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63363
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60271
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57060
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52389
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63363
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
Draft patch:
... regtests cleanly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64270
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a3at.mail at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64369
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64324
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52389
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61758
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59325
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/c++config
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/c++config
@@ -78,11 +78,13 @@
# define _GLIBCXX_USE_DEPRECATED 1
#endif
+#ifndef _GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED
#if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59103
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54756
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55591
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #91 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] [SH] Split QI/HImode load/store via r0
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #83)
Created attachment 33992 [details]
a patch for the issue c#77
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54878
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61142
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64036
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In PR 22553 c#23 Kaz posted some CSiBE numbers to compare sched1 and no-sched1:
CSiBE with -O2)
test namesched1 no-sched1 sched1/no-sched1
bzip2-1.0.2 bzip2.d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59103
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59103
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from janus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The patch in comment 2 needs to be update to
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/primary.c2014-12-16 22:27:14.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/primary.c2014-12-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64036
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
An example function, compiling with -O2 -m4:
int test_0 (unsigned short* x, int y, int z)
{
return
(x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + x[3] + x[4] + x[5] + x[6]
+ x[7] + x[8] +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47660
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53971
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64367
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Dec 21 15:16:08 2014
New Revision: 218997
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218997root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64367
* include/std/stdexcept:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64367
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64370
Bug ID: 64370
Summary: [5 Regression] sreal.c:125:23: error: 'exp2' was not
declared in this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63860
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61931
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34307
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34307action=edit
backport of r197965 (without neon bits) + testcase
Patch which fixes this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64371
Bug ID: 64371
Summary: 'stack smashing detected' in my code (NumStringConv).
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64371
matszpk matszpk at interia dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53987
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
It seems that converting unsigned values to signed values, i.e. replacing
zero-extensions with sign-extensions and recombining sign-extensions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64366
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296
--- Comment #1 from Alfred Minarik alfred.minarik.1 at aon dot at ---
just wanted to add, that I've found you can easily work around by
make BOOT_CFLAGS='-fPIC -g -O2'
(I don't know if something additionally gets compiled with -fPIC that needn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62298
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59549
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I haven't checked, but it could be related to this. When shifts are
expanded/combined on SH2 (no dynamic shifts), library function calls might be
intially inserted but then removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62176
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
As shown by pr64138 and the links therein, disambiguation of procedures by
argument position is tricky. This does not change the fact that the behavior
should be the same for,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372
Bug ID: 64372
Summary: Spurious warning with throw in ternary operator
returning const reference
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34308
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34308action=edit
hppa ivopts dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, ancient issue is ancient:
Here it starts: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-07/msg01851.html
Still, I think Segher has a point in comment #4. Why not just enable all the
multilibs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64371
matszpk matszpk at interia dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: uecker at eecs dot berkeley.edu
Created attachment 34309
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34309action=edit
minimized test case
xgcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20141221 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17280
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Dec 21 22:36:33 2014
New Revision: 218998
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218998root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/17280
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17280
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
--- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17)
(In reply to thopre01 from comment #16)
Did we? All I can find is you and Andreas mentionning that it should work
because it will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #92 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Dec 21 23:37:42 2014
New Revision: 218999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218999root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/55212
* config/sh/sh.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61864
Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041
Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55591
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
what about applying this to stage 1 4.9 ?
Too late for 5.0? Note that the patch in comment 3 may have to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372
--- Comment #3 from Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl ---
BTW, *(ptr ? ptr : throw ptr) would be fine, would not create any temporary, in
any of the language standards.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372
--- Comment #4 from Tavian Barnes tavianator at gmail dot com ---
I meant to include -std=c++11 in the OP, it still happens with that flag set.
Good suggestion for the replacement though. The actual code was closer to i
length ? a[i] : throw
63 matches
Mail list logo
